Here's a paraphrasis of a statement I posted in various places around the web today concerning problems with impulsion hypothesis
"The thermal motion problem highlights a flaw in the model and paradigm in which impulsion hypothesis is based. Stated simply, as things stand, impulsion hypothesis offers no credible way to explain the behaviour of different gases. It is therefore unable to address the thermodynamic issues of fluid dynamics.
This, taken in conjunction with issues related to the hypothesis' description of acceleration in a gravitational field, leads me to consider that the model as it stands may be fatally flawed; being based in an oversimplified mechanistic model which does not possess any credible basis in reality, which fails at both the mechanical and thermodynamic levels and which fails as a 4-space modelling exercise.
There are a few options left to consider and I shall continue to pursue these until all avenues have been explored"
That's a weight off my mind
This conjectural stuff needs to be done though, so I'll keep on doing it