Linda's Falsehoods

[Mikado14]

And again, Linda lies and obfuscates the facts:

Mikado also comes up with these threats of how he is always going to sue almost everybody he can think of. This is something that he has had a history of and that hasn't gone well for him in the past. According to some of my sources this is what was written about his own attempts to be his own lawyer. Apparently it was not that professional. The comments in red were from my source. And the opinion is his own.


“The plaintiffs filed a pro se complaint on June 26, 1998, raising a significant number of claims against myriad defendants.”

i.e. everything is everyone else’s fault but his.

The amended complaint, rather than refining the claims, however, contained a total of seventy-four counts and was written in language that was unclear and unnecessarily repetitive, at best. This lack of clarity made meaningful consideration of the defendants’ memorandum of law in support of their motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 49) and the plaintiffs’ response thereto (Doc. No. 51) impossible. The court then held oral argument for the purpose of determining what claims the plaintiffs were trying to pursue. To that end, the court reviewed each claim with plaintiffs’ counsel so that the court could understand the intended nature of the claims.
i.e. he repeats himself endlessly without anyone knowing what he’s trying to say !
http://www.paed.uscourts.gov/documents/ ... D0998P.pdf

The court was referencing MY attorney...you stupid twisting twit! I filed the complaint "pro se" but retained an attorney BEFORE the house was destroyed. And while your at it, why don't you include the actual "order"?

AND NOW, this day of December, 1999, upon consideration of the defendants’ motion
to dismiss (Doc. No. 48), the defendants’ memorandum of law in support of their motion to
dismiss (Doc. No. 49), the plaintiffs’ response thereto (Doc. No. 51), the defendants’ restated
motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 56), and the plaintiffs’ response thereto (Doc. No. 61), IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED that the motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND
DENIED IN PART. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED with respect to Counts III through VII.
Counts III, IV, and V.B are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and leave is GRANTED for
the plaintiffs to amend those counts within ten (10) days of the date hereof in order to correct the2
defects pointed out in the accompanying memorandum. Counts V.A, V.C, VI, and VII are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. With respect to Counts I and VIII through XIV, the motion to
dismiss is DENIED without prejudice to the defendants’ right to renew.

Again, your showing how much of a liar you are. One who obfuscates the facts and presents them in a manner that is contrary to their actual meaning is.....a.......liar for it is intentional.

When involved in a lawsuit, a good deal of posturing takes place. There were 74 counts in the suit. You REALLY need to read the document you are quoting from .....again....and ...... again and you might just understand it.


Otherwise, you are out gunned in the comprehension of a legal tort and the subsequent order.

What an ass you are. I still feel pity for you for you are really attempting to paint me out in manner that makes you appear as anything other than the liar you are.

So, why do you think no one from the original group is posting? Maybe because you introduced Dave as "Morgan....JD etc" to them and they found out the truth. AND then they watch you post about him and continue to talk about all doings and goings on in the "spy world". Wonder why Tula stopped talking to you? Or how about your sister-in-law, now she was an earful to listen to. You need some help there missy....and the others from the initial group, except Raymond for he never met Dave, can see it too for that is why they are silent.

Pity the fool.

Mikado

PS: there was never any offer to settle, don't know where you getting your info other than that other twit or a newspaper that reported only a half story. You are so gullible, aren't you, you even believe yourself. Now why don't you go and be a good little girl and find something else to do. I grow weary of the same tripe out of your mouth and the same bellowing...Paul had you figured out correctly, shells.

[Mikado14]

I keep getting emails from those sending me Linda's posts. I want to thank you all. To me, it is apparent of some things. If these individuals are cutting and pasting to me in a measure to rile me, well, it won't work. Or perhaps they wish to keep this little tet-a-tet going or even still, perhaps they are NOT in agreement with Linda. I believe it is the latter.

This brings me to something I was thinking about as I awoke this morning. Linda proves, to a point, that she is that petulant little girl. I see she commented on the fact that her High School chums were always wrong since she claimed how she was always right. Does anyone see what I see?

And then there is the post above in regard to a "Memorandum and Order". Linda has this propensity for taking certain phrases and/or sentences and then presents them to support her campaign. I was wondering, how much of this was done in the book she wrote? How much of this was done in information given to Paul for his book? Perhaps Linda should look toward that if she ever wants to understand why Paul did what he did. I find her to be a driven person at this point. Driven by her own lust for some form of vengeance that has a foundation on her own misdeeds and in doing so has taken to misrepresenting a situation that involved my entire family. Well, for all those that are receiving some form of primitive pleasure from all this, let me give a few facts out.

Today is the date that the home was started to be destroyed. In this process, my parents were left homeless and living in an RV with no water or sewage for 10 months. My wife and I ended up staying with friends for about 4 months and our children stayed in an apartment we were able to get at the last minute. This situation is a long embattled one in that it involves conservation restrictions and zoning law and civil rights actions against the county for it "rules of civil procedure" and after the demo it was expanded to include civil rights violations against the land trust in that they receive federal monies. What Linda fails to tell you is that the county awarded the right to build the home in 1990. It was not until the house was under roof that the trust found a way around that order. Therefore, the home was not built in any violation or careless disregard for any law, in fact, it was done under a court order allowing the right. For some reason, Linda seems to believe that this has some bearing on her Father or her book. I fail to see it. She is dragging this situation out and it involves my entire family so let us talk a bit about my family.

The house was designed so that I could take care of my parents as they got older. The doorways were large enough to not only accommodate a wheel chair but between the kitchen, family room and parlor there were archways that would allow the passage of a hospital bed if the need arose. Andrew has stated the size of the home at 4800 square feet and he does so to make it appear as some monstrosity. What Andrew doesn't know is that in Pennsylvania, the square footage of the home is "everything" that is either used as living space or can be converted to living space. For instance, there was a two car garage that was 24' x 26'. That comes out to approximately 624 square feet which brings the total that he presents at 4,176. I could go on but it is not worth it.

But let me say how it has affected my parents. My Father went into a depression. Does anyone know what it is like to lose a home? And then still come out to the farm to work it? It was hard on him and he has withdrawn. My Mother just puts up with it all and just wants to live out her life. I see this everyday. And Linda takes pleasure in all of this, apparently.

Now Linda has claimed that it could have been settled and the home saved. She is, again, giving only half truths and her source is probably a newspaper article that Andrew mentioned. Here is the gist of that story.

The trust put out a news release saying that they would give us $125,000 to move the home to another site in a development about 1 1/2 miles away. They brought in an Amish company to give a quote on moving it. The cost was $44,000. As it turned out, that was just for the insertion of dollies under the home and the moving of it to another foundation on another site. However, it did not include the building of support walls in the home, the removal of mechanicals, the seperation of sections of the home, the building of a new foundation on the other site, the drilling of a well, the building of a septic system and the replacement of the mechanicals at the new site and the restoration of the sections. The cost for all of that exceeded what it cost for the home in 1990. Also, there would have been the cost of the property it would have been moved to. What do you think, anyone reading this, the bank had to say about that? Oh, and Andrew mentioned that I could have kept my home and still farmed the farm......WRONG! Does anyone think that the $125,000 was free? In exchange for the money, my family would have to sign over the farm to the trust/Schwartz. So, they were presenting a sham to the court in that they were attempting to obtain the farm for 1/10th of it's value ( at that time ) over a civil dispute. Now remember, it gets complicated, the county granted the right to BUILD the home.

This is the last time I will address this for it is a long and complicated situation and cannot be condensed and explained in a few sentences as Linda and Andrew appear to have been doing/are doing. But there is one last thing that Linda is probably looking at in the papers I sent to Mr twigsnapper...(and that is a laugh)(you still have them Linda...you misrepresented yourself as twigsnapper and now you are attempting to use those papers as some form of ammunition...you are such a liar and manipulator) and that would be the "Decree Nisi". The court ordered that an amount of $25,000 be placed as liquidated damages to the trust. In doing this, the problem would go away and the trust would have had to deal with the county. The problem was, my Father wouldn't sign the papers claiming that the county gave the right to build the home. The deed was in four names and if one refused then we couldn't go through with it. I and my wife were in agreement and my Mother as well. So I am sure Linda will now attack my Father but I still fail to see how any of this has a bearing on Dr. Brown's work or Linda's book or the lies and misrepresentations that Linda perpetrated upon a group of individuals.

I know Linda won't answer here because she wishes to hide behind a forum that, from what I have heard, screens all posts before they are made which is a ruse to control any posts that I would make if I were to join.

Make your own decisions but do so knowing the facts and don't just listen to the ramblings of a person hell bent on creating a form of smear campaign to obfuscate (there is that word again) her own misdeeds.

Move on Linda and get a life.

Mikado

[PeeTee]

WHO IS ONLINE
Users browsing this forum: PeeTee and 0 guests

[PeeTee]

WHO IS ONLINE
Users browsing this forum: PeeTee and 0 guests

WHO IS ONLINE
Users browsing this forum: PeeTee and 0 guests

[Kim]

Care to explain your posts Raymond?

[PeeTee]

sick humour.... I'm just fooling around.... sorry Kim
Raymond

[Mikado14]

The following post that Linda has made can be shown for what it is, .... a hoax perpetrated by Linda on Paul. Maybe she will be put "two and two" together and see the light but probably not but those with a modicum of intelligence will see the validity of what I will say in this post. So, with out further delay, I will begin.

I would like to point out that I INCLUDE the post in its entirety as I have always done and will not pick and choose phrases and/or sentences to enhance my position. I will let the reader decide.

Re: Fred Marisco
by Linda Brown » Wed Nov 23, 2011 2:27 pm
And you have it Hobbit. There are other forces at work here and they are powerful.

Mikado was given an opportunity to interact with someone HE chose to believe was JD.

This is a very important sentence that Linda has said that needs to be explored. First of all, JD is taken from the name "James Dale Barrett" who was a student at Great Valley High School. In the fall of '06, after I joined Paul's forum in August of the same year, I live very close to that school and decided to pay it a visit. I was having dreams, visions some may call it, and felt the need to follow through on them. I went to the library of that school and looked at the year books for '64 and '65. I found Linda in the '64 book and began to peruse the male students looking for the one that Linda claimed was Morgan in Paul's book. Now for those of you with any intelligence you will see that in '06, I did not know Smith or anyone, it was Linda in Paul's book who identified Morgan as being her classmate in that High School. Continuing, I used my ability to pick six names that could have been him and put stars next to all the names. James Dale Barrett was in the number two position. Some time later on Paul's forum, there was talk by Linda...er...twigsnapper about choosing 12 individuals to sit at a table and the question was posed to me as to who/whom I would choose. Among the names I wrote Barretts' name. In less than 12 hours there was a new member by that name on Paul's forum. Now I chose that name knowing it was not the one I felt was Morgan so I was perplexed, especially since it was such an immediate response. So, to sum this up in a nutshell, the name JD comes from that.

Now, for those of you who have read Paul's book, you know that Linda gave information to Paul that Morgan was a person by the name of Dave Smith, I know this for Paul confirmed the name in Huntingdon at the meeting which was in December of '08. Understand, in '08 Paul's book, the first draft, had been completed since approximately February. So, any information that Paul had was in the book that pertained to Morgan and that information had a source....Linda Brown Leach...and that was all done long before I ever knew Linda Brown Leach or Paul Schatzkin.

We now shoot ahead to March 17, 2010, two years after Paul finished his first draft, I located Dave Smith alive and well in Phoenixville Pennsylvania, which is a stones throw from Great Valley High School located approximately 3 miles away on Phoenixville Pike.

Now, getting to the gist of it all, those with any intelligence can see that I did not create the character Morgan or who he was in High School, Linda Brown Leach did. Therefore, if I believed Dave Smith to be Morgan, or JD for that matter, it was because of facts obtained in Paul's book and from Linda's own words. Even Dave confirms that he dated Linda in High School. He confirms going to Florida to see her. He confirms the scorpion incident in the dorms at college and a plethora of other stories except for the claim of being Morgan and meeting Stephenson.

What should have I believed? What would anyone have believed? And now she is attempting to save face by claiming I made it up and CHOSE to believe it all, as she said in a post a while ago, a figment of my imagination.....a figment created by what Linda told Paul and he wrote about.

We all remember the talk of " having chess" That person accompanied me many places. Introduced simply as "Smith". To those who were there they made their own "mental contract" with the man and each except Mikado and Kim have been honorable to that contract. Mikado asks in a recent message today why no one else is saying anything. Perhaps they see what is happening and realize how important their association with that man was.... and how Mikado has fallen so far away from any trust and respect from him.

Now that he has been caught up in going " the wrong way" he has decided to turn against that character too. Instead of protecting and honoring the opportunity for future developments... Mikado he has allowed Kim and now even himself to " out" that character.

And Mikado eventually will wonder why his " chess partner" has disappeared from his life. In fact I suspect that any association that Mikado has had with that particular man has been "shelved" as well as any contact in my direction. Perhaps he hasn't noticed that yet... but what did he expect?

Are you sure about each and everyone one of them Linda? I remember having a talk with Rose's husband in the lobby of the Alexis in August of '10. We talked about the possibility of "Dave" being who you said he was. That entire meeting of all of us centered around that fact. YOU allowed everyone to believe that he was Morgan but for some reason, his memory was wiped to protect national security. I say hogwash to that story. How about you Pladuim being told that Hog Island was JD? Who did that? YOU did, I have the IP's to prove it. And how is this pertinent to the quote above? ...because you perpetrated it and allowed everyone to believe it but one must ask the question ....why? One can come up with many answers but I will not speculate as you do and put out wrongful conclusions however one thing can be ascertained from it all. A hoax was created to feed Paul information and that hoax took on a life of it's own, Dave was merely the impetus or the dildo to thrust it home. You used Dave and when he turned up alive and well, your hoax might be exposed. I remember you telling me to figure it out. I did, you know I would, you also know how I hate a mystery, just as in science, and you must have known that you would be found out.

Now what you call "out that character"...what character? the truth? How is truth "out"ing? Even Dave said to me, before the Vegas outing in March, that he wished you wouldn't tell people that he was Morgan/JD so why did you continue to do so even as late as July at the Traveller's house? Do you really think he believed you? At best, he is sitting on the fence and leaning and a really good stiff wind will put him on the other side and it won't be on the side you want.

As to falling away from any respect and trust from Dave, I doubt that. Dave hasn't said that to me and I spoke with him about 4 weeks ago. Remember Linda, it is a small town and if Dave called tomorrow and asked for help I would be there. I will not castigate him for what you have done and what you have drawn him into and unlike you, I can separate the two. What ever he may choose, I will not judge and I will be his friend but then the choice to be mine is his and not yours. As to future developments, developments of what? He never wanted to know anything about anything so what could you be inferring? Oh, I see, you are putting out a smoke screen with this statement, okay, it isn't worth the energy to blow the smoke away.

And lastly, as to being asked if I could be trusted, well, I don't recall being asked but I do know that out of all the individuals in the past several years, you are the only one who has stated that. Of course, I am referring to those that I have met and dealt with and not disembodied words typed on a screen. I remember trusting in you and you betrayed that with no more regard than flushing a toilet, which is what you did to all the trust that was developed between a group of individuals. A group of individuals that wanted, at the very least, was to make a scratch in the world, a nudge here or a nudge there to create a change, a betterment by trying to introduce new technology or just new ideas of science, to instill the genius and creativity in others that would hopefully lead to a new understanding of the universe. A group that would trust each other and know what was in their hearts and their souls and that their actions were not for personal gain but for the gain of our children and the children of the universe...mankind.... and all that was brought down by a hoax...or was it? But however, remember who questioned trust first...it was you in Vegas and it was all over the 98% comment which had nothing to do with NOT trusting and I won't explain it again here for I have done that enough.

Trust. An important word in some circles. I trusted you. You disclosed personal information to satisfy some primeval urge you had or was it a prepubescent outburst? Don't know, don't care but you violated any trust. As to disclosing Dave's name, why not? You disclosed all kinds of info about me and in Dave's own admission, he claimed that he was NOT Morgan/JD so what did he have to hide?....nothing, for all he has is his honor and that would be the truth, for Dave can be brutally honest and if he didn't respect me as you say in the above quote then he would have said so 4 weeks ago.

Mikado has proven what was asked of him. He was asked if he could be trusted. The answer was NO.

Your right, I can 't be trusted in the perpetrating of a hoax. I gave you ample opportunity to come clean and you refused, even to the point of telling truths in lies and lies in truths sitting in a Mc Donalds in July. Did you really think you could openly do so and I wouldn't be able to tell? Well guess what, you succeeded in a way. It was difficult to tell certain things but there were certain things that came through. So, again I ask, who asked me if I could be trusted? I don't recall ever being asked but I do recall telling you "things" that I prefaced with "between us" which I didn't know at the time, included the rest of the civilized world.

In all of this Fred (on the other hand) has maintained a solid respectful attitude toward the man he met. I always have appreciated that. ( and so has he) This entire thing was not Freds fault at all. He just got caught up in the machinery as it was grinding out the opportunity for Mikado to show his stuff.

Linda, do we really need to go there again? Who called whom at work and was flustered that the Hut Master was in the forum and deleting and moving posts as we spoke and then was found out later that he WASN'T EVEN ON THE FORUM AT THE TIME? Even the Traveler confirmed this. This is pathetic, you know it? And what about the call to Karen Ann that you claimed Carlos informed you of? (a subject that I will not go into at this posting).

As to Mikado showing his stuff. What did I show? I showed how when met with a conundrum that I will tell the truth and the facts as I know them. That I did not like what you did to Fred or the posts you made at that time, and they are all saved in the Hut. Posts that were casting aspersions and falsehoods without any facts or evidence. Even the Traveler has apologized to Fred for what happened, at least he is a man worthy of respect. A plan you may say? You think so very little of Fred that you would publicly humiliate him and then you have the audacity to say that he merely got caught in the machinery? Have you no self-respect in that you think so very little of anyone and then publicly acknowledge that fact?

And I am sorry and I apoligize to all of you for all of the discord that had to happen before the end of the trail was reached. But I HAD to go to the end of it.

And it is so sad that sometimes I think I can not even bear it. But as was said to me as a conclusion to this.....
"It is what it is" Linda

And you have apologized in the past for your rantings and ramblings and I am sure, as sure as God created little green apples, that you will not let it die. Going to the END of it? About time but I doubt it for there is more that will come out. If the individuals you claimed as Morgan and twigsnapper are NOT then what else? And do so remember, the man you introduced to me as twigsnapper you also introduced to Paul and that introduction was long before I ever came on the scene so you can't blame that on my figment...maybe you can blame Paul.

You claimed to PeeTee or whatever name he is going by that you found it so very easy to "chew" on my pant leg for I make such an easy target.....

...you make it so very easy to show the hoax you have perpetrated on Paul and everyone going back to the original forum with your posts.

It is a shame in that no one is posting from 6 years ago but Pauls' forum is there for all to read. Maybe your neophytes on the Nickel should read a bit over there before commenting.

Enjoy you new life.

Mikado

[Kim]

A post that Fred has asked me to make for him.

And you have it Hobbit. There are other forces at work here and they are powerful.

Mikado was given an opportunity to interact with someone HE chose to believe was JD.
We all remember the talk of " having chess" That person accompanied me many places. Introduced simply as "Smith". To those who were there they made their own "mental contract" with the man and each except Mikado and Kim have been honorable to that contract. Mikado asks in a recent message today why no one else is saying anything. Perhaps they see what is happening and realize how important their association with that man was.... and how Mikado has fallen so far away from any trust and respect from him.

Now that he has been caught up in going " the wrong way" he has decided to turn against that character too. Instead of protecting and honoring the opportunity for future developments... Mikado he has allowed Kim and now even himself to " out" that character.

And Mikado eventually will wonder why his " chess partner" has disappeared from his life. In fact I suspect that any association that Mikado has had with that particular man has been "shelved" as well as any contact in my direction. Perhaps he hasn't noticed that yet... but what did he expect?

Mikado has proven what was asked of him. He was asked if he could be trusted. The answer was NO.

In all of this Fred (on the other hand) has maintained a solid respectful attitude toward the man he met. I always have appreciated that. ( and so has he) This entire thing was not Freds fault at all. He just got caught up in the machinery as it was grinding out the opportunity for Mikado to show his stuff.

And I am sorry and I apoligize to all of you for all of the discord that had to happen before the end of the trail was reached. But I HAD to go to the end of it.

And it is so sad that sometimes I think I can not even bear it. But as was said to me as a conclusion to this.....
"It is what it is" Linda

Happy Thanksgiving!
I guess I should be flattered that I have have an entire thread dedicated to me at the "Wooden Nickel" site. Seems that no matter how one speaks the truth, if it does not fit the agenda, the truth matters not. Preserve the story at all costs.

Since it seems so important to all of you, I will state my case once. I am not defending anything, for there was nothing in what i have done that was deceitful or hateful. That is not a part of who I am.

Ridgerunner is/was a person other than Mikado or Kim. He states exactly who he was, a psychologist in PA. Yes, I did setup his account for him through Mikado, and I did state to Mikado at the time that "there will be repercussions no matter how well intended the man is and we are." As is evident even now, Mikado and I are are still being accused of all manner of dastardly deeds.

I began reading Paul's book as he was putting out chapters online, while I was deeply involved in an alternative energy project. I was researching the work of Tesla, Stubblefield, Moray, and ran across Townsend Brown. I did not register on Paul's forum until March 2, 2008. I remember the day well as it is also my brother's birthday.

At some point in time (probably in April 2008) while discussing the typos and grammatical errors I encountered in Paul's book with my late wife, I suggested that I send him an PM/email and offer editorial services to him. Cyndi sent him a quote and he never responded again. Those emails were forwarded to Ms. Brown and Rose soon after the "Epic Fail" blog post.

I defended TTB and Ms. Brown on the History Channel forums, and earlier on Paul's forum when one Richard Hull joined and just trashed TTB and his physics. I then defended "Ridgerunner" when everyone else seemed so intent on beating on him. As he person that was going to provide the publicity and promotion of the book, I felt that it was necessary for Ms. Brown to stand up for herself since interviewers on TV or radio talk shows may not be so kind, and it would be good experience. Obviously not everyone agreed, least of all Ms. Brown.

As I recall, a similar VW Beetle story was told by another member while in Europe. My experience happened exactly where "Morgan" and "Carl" parked a green VW by Rittenhouse Square. And wasn't it synchronicity that the owner of that green Beetle contacted me after nearly 20 years? HE was the one that reminded me, "We sat on the bench by the 'lion and snake' waiting for Cindy (not my late wife Cyndi) who lived at the Dorchester to come down.

I also attended the horse show at Devon on occasion, although I was working in Thoroughbred racing, I entertained myself at Devon and in Fair Hill just to "pick up girls." Jockeys like rock stars have their own groupies.

I was instrumental in creating the website "TTOWNSENDBROWN.COM" with Jim Norton formerly Mid-Valley Hosting, and setting up the forum the Quonset Hut. I was approached by both Mikado and Ms. Brown to do this because Ms. Brown claimed that her private messages were being read and edited at another site. She felt and we agreed that having a place for the promotion of her book and her father's legacy without fear of her privacy being compromised was necessary.

There was a time when I discovered a "hidden" section in the forum and was told that it was "private" between author and editor, and so never looked into that again. But I will state here for the record, that I have never read anyone's PM's or emails, unless a copy was forwarded by the person. I was asked to read a PM by the person who received it, but I refused, stating that, "If you want me to read something that was send to you in private message, you will have to copy and paste it to me because I will NOT violate your privacy even though you want me to."

I have been warned about CIA or some other 3-letter agency that may be knocking at my door. So far that hasn't occurred and quite honestly I doubt that it will. This was mentioned in regards to my telling someone that I met "JD/Morgan" and that was used as "evidence" to prove my being a "threat" or a "leak" in regards to some secret covert operations. There also was a photo taken of this man which I forwarded to only one person. That person was also in the photo!

As a result of these two "violations" it seems that my integrity was questioned and my reputation trashed, not only in private, but publicly across forums and in emails. I probably have enough evidence to file a libel suit but for what purpose? Would it serve to clear my name? Would it serve as retribution for the wrongs done to me?

And finally, this is directed to all of you who have communicated with me in the past and know who I am:
I have not changed who I am, why then do you not support me? In the weeks and months after Cyndi's death, I received no sympathy cards or calls. There was only one person that had the decency to show up at graveside: Mikado.

There you have it. I offer no apology or retractions. I said what is true, so deal with it.


Fred Marsico

[Mikado14]

To kevin:

I know you are here reading for your IP comes up even though you say that you are not. Also, it is apparent that you have comments to make but you hide behind Linda's skirts. So, does that mean that you lied when you mentioned that you were not going to the Hut? Appears that way.

Big bad wolf? You are ignorant and an ass to boot. You talk as if you have a paper asshole and a paper asshole can't hold crap just like your statements.

You wanted truth, I posted truth but you would rather believe the ramblings of someone who would reconstruct the truth from documents. That is what is referred to as spin doctoring.

On second thought, stay away, WE are stronger without you than with you.

Mikado

[htmagic]

A post that Fred has asked me to make for him.

<SNIP>

And finally, this is directed to all of you who have communicated with me in the past and know who I am:
I have not changed who I am, why then do you not support me? In the weeks and months after Cyndi's death, I received no sympathy cards or calls. There was only one person that had the decency to show up at graveside: Mikado.

There you have it. I offer no apology or retractions. I said what is true, so deal with it.


Fred Marsico

Fred,

While Mikado did show up at your graveside, I have been in contact with you almost daily for several years now. I did offer my sympathy at the time of Cyndi's passing and helping you cope with the depression even a year later. There are some that 'sticketh closer than a brother.' I think I was there for you, buddy.

As for the rest of this stuff, there sure is a lot of mud slinging. I haven't had time to check in or move to the new forum. If ity is all full of mud-slinging, at least I didn't miss much of importance!

Peace,