Linda Brown wrote:Another thought that I want to leave you with and which might be worth some discussion here on the Hut is this.
Why does the FBI refer to the " gravitor" design that was demonstrated in Pearl Harbor by Dad along with his " Flying discs"..... referred to as a " communication device?
What is it about the " Gravitor" that would qualify it as that?
And why did mention of the Gravitor disappear while at the same time Dad went on to demonstrate the " Flying discs" quite openly in Los Angeles. He even made the LA times with a picture of the units in operation. Why would Dad have done that....shown the discs to almost anyone that he could show them to.... while keeping the Gravitor under wraps?
If it was a " communication device" then what are Mikados plans with it? He has never actually mentioned communications, has he?
We will be talking about all of this. In depth.
Linda
Here are a few answers for you Linda even though this has been hashed over several times but I do so for the benefit of newer readers.
A Gravitor would qualify as a communications device in the same manner that a coil qualifies as a communications device. Two questions answered, if one has the knowledge to understand.
Was the Gravitor kept under wraps at Pearl Harbor? What is the source of information that this is derived from? Past discussions was that it was referred to as "a carnival ride" and if one is to look at the photo of the device in LA that you refer to than that is exactly what it looks like.
Linda Brown wrote:If it was a " communication device" then what are Mikados plans with it? He has never actually mentioned communications, has he?
I believe that I do not have to disclose any plans but enough of them have been disclosed by you. My plans are to develop as much data as possible to create the ability to utilize mathematical equations that will design and predict the operation of a Gravitor. Once that is understood and possible then further developments would follow.
Communications? In past posts I have discussed it, you just don't remember.
As to talking in depth, have at it, that is what this forum is about. To provide an open discussion of science and fringe science, whether it be Dr. Brown, Tesla, Miller, Einstein, Apsden, Podkletnov, Puharich or anyone who has theorized, tested, built anything pertaining to applied science or fringe science.
Mikado