http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... 828#p34828
Linda Leach wrote:Re: Andrew Bollands Story
Postby Linda Brown » Sun Jun 21, 2015 2:20 pm
Andrew. You don't know about Dr. Kovalenko?
Mikado claims that he doesn't know who he is.
And I guess since some of the members on the HUT don't have the research skills enough to know of him...
perhaps I can repeat this little message posted here on the Token quite some time ago. The questions need to be asked again... very carefully. Notice that this was written in October....
[i]"by Linda Brown » Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:06 am
And this is a far out thought that I seem to need to be awake at 3am to write here....????
Why was it that the "A kid named Smith, who walked across the cornfield to join us at Ashlawn" HAPPENED TO BE A STUDENT of the Russian Language?Why is it.... that as he was being drawn into the group that my Mother had dubbed " Nassau".... why is it that Dad set up a meeting between that kid and Ilya Tolstoy. Why was it that Captain Tolstoy and this kid had that important discussion in that language? Why is it that only AFTER that meeting in St. Augustines Marineland was there another big meeting set in Nassau. Why is it that being a " Russian Translator" became this kids " job discription" in the years that followed?
Why is it that there have been for years....... Russian scientific trawlers anchored off the tip of Cape San Antonio in Cuba?
Why is it that a gentleman who speaks fluent Russian ( besides having a wonderful soulful Russian singing voice) was encouraged to write of his experiences with what could be called " Pop up" messages while he happened to be in the Berlin Tunnel before it was... " discovered" and revealed. Why is it that this Gentleman ( Dr. Kovalenko) and the man named Smith have had the opportunity to meet and review work, personally.
Why is it that this all seems to be coming together especially NOW?[/i
**********************************************************************************************And strangely....nearly a year later.... those questions are STILL important. Maybe even MORE important.
And now of course I have other questions... WHY is it that it was important for me to be shown conclusively that I had " a couple of moles in my network".... WHY was it important for me to discover that Mikado and you were together conspiring in what I was trying to do? WHY has it turned into such an obvious case of twisted mentalities forming an alliance?
For me it was an obvious and kind lesson in how to discover and guard against future treachery. It was nothing I had ever experienced before. I appreciate the length of time that some took to let me see what was happening... what had been happening behind my back for all of those years. I had to discover that for myself and it is a lesson I will NEVER forget.
There are many more questions that I have regarding the two of you... Andrew Bolland ( Chris Knight) and Mikado Mikado (Mikado).... but for now I am content to know that you are having to operate out in the open.
....with your membership and the ordinary public watching your EVERY public action. ...and with others watching your every hidden move.......
Now.... with absolutely no further connections with Linda Brown....... Lets see how long your association continues to be viable.....
As I have been told (and am ready to accept.) It is no longer my concern.
Linda Brown TTB Consortium June 2015
From the Shadow of Giant Rock
First comment would be...."with absolutely no further connections with Linda Brown..." , that is not going to happen or is happening. Fruitbat continues to cut and paste to Linda and she keeps responding. She can't keep her mouth shut, never could and she won't here. She is just doing dramatic presentation, situation normal.
What membership are you referring? Membership to the normal human race where fantasy driven individuals who present such as fact don't live? okay, I'll agree to that.
Linda is referring to Ilya Tolstoy who was one of the founders of Marineland in Florida. She would have us believe that he vetted young Smith by talking Russian to him. It is quite possible that they did speak in Russian, if they ever really met for all we have is her word that it happened. Based upon other stories, not only to Paul but to others, the chances are that this is another example of how an actual event is embellished into a story that is so far removed from what happened as a sword is to a gun, both weapons mind you but totally different.
We were led to believe that Brown visited the Berlin Tunnel just prior to it being discovered and somewhere, twigsnapper made comment they barely got away or something like that. I just don't feel like going to look for the link but it will be at the ttbrown.com/forum. Now here are a few facts:
1. Brown left and came home on April 4, 1956 on the Liberte' as mentioned in Chapter 70, page 464 of the book "Defying Gravity".
2. It was reported in "Defying Gravity" that Brown went to Cheltenham for the Gold Cup which was run on Thursday, 8th March, 1956.
3. The Berlin Tunnel in question was discovered on 21-22 April 1956 (http://www.coldwar.org/articles/50s/berlin_tunnel.asp)
How could Brown have been there? He would have to left immediately. Although this might be possible, there are questions as to his being at the Cheltenham Gold Cup due to a conflict of dates, a usual issue that seems to occur. (viewtopic.php?p=31189#p31189)
Now, what about Kovalenko and the La Fonda group? I am aware of the La Fonda group as to doing remote psychokinesis experiments and a fellow named Eugene. If memory serves me, I think they were out of Alamos and he was a retired physicist. I could be wrong with all of this but they something to do with remote viewers as well. I just don't feel like doing a Google, if I am wrong, I am wrong, don't really care but I believe you, Linda, are wholesaling another story based upon some fact or communication with someone connected to the study this group was doing. Here is a link to a blog I was following a few years back; https://www.blogger.com/profile/13270393663168509250 . Somewhere in there the La Fonda Group is mentioned but no mention of Kovalenko. Can't wait to hear the explanation.
And one last time. There were no moles in what you call your network. Why do you call all of us that were involved with you as "your network"? Sounds a bit egotistical that we were in "your network". I was under the impression that we were all together in search of truth in regard to your Father's work. I was under the impression that any information we found out was to be shared with all. I was under the impression that we were all equal. You do understand that concept? don't you? Probably not, due to all your actions.
The only twisted mentalities are the ones in your cranium....and perhaps Dave from association. No one was out to get you. You are operating under the assumption that there was a conspiracy. Is this what you call it when the truth is found out and it doesn't fit with what you have been wholesaling? Why do you think the rebuttals to you with links and citations? They serve to show you are wrong. That is not an attack, as you claim but if you continue to tell the same stories when confronted with facts then it reflects upon you as what you have been called. Either a liar or someone so gullible but then, your gullibility to certain individuals has been closely proven that those individuals are one in the same....you.
And lastly, you seem to be under the impression that Andy and I are into some type of association. Wrong, as usual. We have become the friends we should have been a long time ago but were not due to your machinations behind the scenes. How is it that you accuse everyone else of what you are guilty of?
I pray that you find peace.
Mikado
https://www.blogger.com/profile/13270393663168509250