No Clue Clan

[Mikado14]

Speaking of "no clue", Linda appears to have been informed of who was at the conference. She is using the name "Avocado" that Linda Bolland joking referred to me as since it rhymed with Mikado. I knew that if I put that in there, Linda could not ignore it and use it. It was a planted tell. I also knew that she would do it rather quickly for the use of it would tickle her and she would use it to be "cute".

Fairly apparent that she is on her blame game again. She wonders why Paul quit the book. She can't accept the reason for such which she has been told many times is because of her she is the primary reason. Not one...count them....not one person could come forth and offer any evidence for Brown as to what the anonymous characters Morgan, twigsnapper, grinder (who originally started out as nothing more than a poster but after almost two years became a part of the Caroline according to his postings), Martin Calloway, Victoria Steele, Mark Culpepper and stable full of others. In fact, as a side note, I am still finding members on this forum that go back to her IP. So far, there are four.

The meeting at Huntingdon is her bastion of faith in that it was the deciding point for Paul to quit and that somehow, he was coerced by others to do so. It could never have been her actions, never the lies, the prevarication, the phony token bought at a swap meet, Livingston's wife pretending to be a secretary to Morgan ( which by the way, the phone went right back to her...does anyone find it a coincidence that it just happened to be her phone number? And when returned the call she feigned ignorance...and Linda's explanation was that they could use anyone's phone?...out of all the phones in the US it just happens to be the one of the wife of a family friend?...really? ...and she continues to squeal this truth to drown out the ones who find it incredulous), the thumpstick bought at a swap meet and the list goes on.

So, Linda is using the "tell" I planted. That also means that who/whomever supplied her with that (unless she came in here from an IP at Cathedral Springs or Palm Springs) information had to tell her that Andrew Bolland was there. Afterall, she is using the name used by Linda Bolland which would mean to normal individuals that her husband Andrew was present as well. I wonder...the squeaking sound.....is it the sound of her sphincter tightening?

Now let's look at this, her memoir has been pulled. The last time I heard of a book being pulled was in the 30's and they were burned. But then this is an ebook. Afterall, anyone can put out an ebook, that is not real publishing, it is a bit more than a blog. Now one can wonder why? And now she is writing another book. A book that will be authored by her and Morgan....(laughing out loud). I can only wonder if she understands what is the definition of Biography.

News flash.....Paul was writing a biography. There were no supporting facts to substantiate the claims made by anonymous individuals but Linda felt it appropriate that these were facts because she said so, she averred the veracity of the facts. But then came the Huntingdon meeting. Paul saying he wanted proof and explained the proof but it never materialized. If Paul would have edited the published draft into a final tome, it would have not been a biography but a book of supposition and/or a work of fiction based upon a real person....oh....but wait....that is what Linda had done with several characters herself. She used real people to create a character thus giving a sense of reality...in her mind.

Those that have been around Linda when these individuals were present were always told..."don't look but that is Morgan/twigsnapper/Victoria Steele but don't say anything for you are not supposed to know". REALLY? ...than why say anything? Afterall, these individuals were so enamoured and indebted to Brown they don't want his story to go by the wayside ...but.....THEY DON'T HAVE THE BALLS TO STATE IT!!! Suppose they didn't think that much of him now ....do/did they?

Anyone who spent real time with Linda knows exactly what I am talking about.

At the meeting in Vegas in '08, you know the one where everyone comments about it but they weren't there? Linda showed a photo of twigsnapper to all present but when she showed it to Andrew, he actually showed a disinterest by offering a casual glance. That told me he knew him already. Another situation where a real person was used to create a fictitious character. A person who merely rented a room from her and George.

And I wonder why Linda hasn't said anything about Andrew or his wife? Afterall, she is using the tell I planted so she knows he was there.

I ask myself, why is she so afraid of Andrew Bolland?

Mikado

[kevin]

Mikado,
Token bought at a swap meet?
Thumpstick bought at a swap meet?

Are those known fact?
Kevin

[kevin]

Mikado,
Token bought at a swap meet?
Thumpstick bought at a swap meet?

Are those known fact?
Kevin

Bump

[Mikado14]

Mikado,
Token bought at a swap meet?
Thumpstick bought at a swap meet?

Are those known fact?
Kevin

The token was told to me by someone who was there.

The thumpstick was told to me by Linda at the McDonald's in July of 2011.

I trust the person who told me about the token and as to Linda, who knows if it is true but I would bet for I did hold the thumpstick at the meeting with Paul in Huntingdon in December of 2008, that it is as Linda described to me at McDonalds. It was a very frail walking stick where the handle was "nailed" on with what appeared to be finishing nails. I would be afraid to lean on it let alone "thump" someone with it.

So kevin, are they known facts? To me they are. You have to make a determination for yourself.

Best,

Mikado

[kevin]

Mikado,

What in hells bells was all the effort about trying to identify that stupid stick about then?
Linda definately told the tale of it been Morgans , then exchanged for Paul fathers cap badge, as I re-call?

I feel absolutely gutted as to the depths of deceptions involved in this whole senario.
Kevin

[kevin]

Message to Linda,
http://unhypnotize.com/debates/90027-li ... post117311
Kevin

[kevin]

A poster using the name gravitywave, has posted an answer from Her that will not engage with moi.

Stating that the thumpstick belonging to Him named MORGAN ( named by Paul)was passed from His hands to Her hands to Pauls hands, according to Her that will not lower Herself to write such Herself....if gravitywave isn't Her anyway...I haven't a clue?
Kevin

[kevin]

The thumpstick first been mentioned must be in Pauls forum?
Kevin

[Mikado14]

I smell a chuckling cohort.

She knows you read on the Token, kevin. Apparently, someone saw your post here and either gave it to her or she saw it here herself. In any event, she is afraid to answer you herself.

But as I replied to the post on the unhypnotize forum, she still remains a prevariator for if on the one hand, what I said is true and she told me so in McDonalds then her post is a lie. If what she told me in McDonalds was a lie and her post is true then the result is that she still lied.

Once a lie is made, it makes future statements questionable but in any event, a lie is lurking about for she has told two stories.

Mikado

[kevin]

I smell a chuckling cohort.

She knows you read on the Token, kevin. Apparently, someone saw your post here and either gave it to her or she saw it here herself. In any event, she is afraid to answer you herself.

But as I replied to the post on the unhypnotize forum, she still remains a prevariator for if on the one hand, what I said is true and she told me so in McDonalds then her post is a lie. If what she told me in McDonalds was a lie and her post is true then the result is that she still lied.

Once a lie is made, it makes future statements questionable but in any event, a lie is lurking about for she has told two stories.

Mikado

I don't bother to even look at the token anymore, haven't for many weeks.
Are You gravitywave?
http://www.ttbrown.com/forum/search.php ... k&start=15
Kevin