Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

[kevin]

Todays lesson....read by little boy blue.

WE ??????? ( who is WE?) have seen,
distraction experts putting Linda in a bad light.

And will all those bad nit pickers please stop pointing out the details.
All those claiming the moral high ground, come back down here where I wallow.

Lindas cries out...
" No respect"
That is a two way mirror, it takes a lot of earning, and there is a mounting series of reflections pointed right at YOU.

So! school children,
Stop throwing paper helicopters at each other, and don't any of You dare to pull funny faces at Linda , or else.

Little boy blue.
End of todays PREACHING.

Kevin

[kevin]

A note to NIT pickers.
Always be assured that the NITS are only attracted to those with CLEAN hair.
Kevin

[kevin]

Kevin ( now perched up in the moral trees)
Asks a question....nervously.
WTF is a "convoluted ethicsbabbler"

Kevin

[kevin]

Kevin ( now perched up in the moral trees)
Asks a question....nervously.
WTF is a "convoluted ethicsbabbler"

Kevin

Been searching all over for these convoluted ethicsbabblers...give us a clue...
Are they BLUE coloured???
Kevin

[kevin]

This scene just popped into My head...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvAyulS8lmQ
Kevin

[Fruitbat]

All good stuff.

I don't actually want the fight. I feel that Kevin "provokes" me, and it's obviously a character weakness that causes me to respond, which I have now taken care of by using the "foes" feature of the board.
I have decided that since after three years of reading his output none of it has been of use or seemingly posted with a good heart and so consequently I am better off ignoring it.

Moving on, to the more general complaint, Nancy Hutchison has already used my name elsewhere in a violation of any right to privacy that I may have expected, so there was little point in my not using my name really was there? I think perhaps it's less than fair however to let that poor avionics engineers visage and C.V. stand for all to see, and possibly be confused with my self.

Whilst I take the well made point that if you don't want your details spread far and wide than you shouldn't use services like linkedin, or faecalbook, equally, I don't see how Kevin's posting is anything but malicious in it's intent. Designed as so many of his posts are, for some incomprehensible reason known only to himself specifically to annoy me. (something which he admitted to in black and white on the cosmic token a while back).

I'm already "pre-annoyed by life" and I don't need some jerk winding me up seemingly for luis's pleasure. I'm not putting up with it, but it still doesn't seem fair that that poor bloke's profile should be used as a pawn in hobbits childish games either..

But you run your site as you want Mikado. If I don't like it or you don't like me, I don't have to stay and slug it out.

In the mean time, I'd like to get back to the science and the humour. I can see the there are five Non-science and non humorous posts above this one but I can't read em! Wonderful!

FB.

[TheTraveler]

FB,

You don't see those posts because they were made by Kevin, and you have marked him as a Foe.

[LuisP]

A very judicious, well thought and better grounded, decision by Mikado. So much so that I think it should be regarded with jurisprudent-like strength of Precedent, and the matter it derived from, simply too valuable a lesson as to have it all deleted and forgotten.

And FB ?
Accepting misinterpretations of one’s intentions is a fact of life, produced even from those who know us and could know better, so to see it happen with others not so unburdened is not any surprise.

That is why I can only hope that “my pleasure” inside this situation may come, in time, to be understood by you as precisely the opposite of what you now, seemingly misinterpreting what I did, think of it.


But hey, hope you don’t “foe” me ! Gimme first at least a couple years worth of breaking your balls, will you ?

[kevin]

All good stuff.

I don't actually want the fight. I feel that Kevin "provokes" me, and it's obviously a character weakness that causes me to respond, which I have now taken care of by using the "foes" feature of the board.
I have decided that since after three years of reading his output none of it has been of use or seemingly posted with a good heart and so consequently I am better off ignoring it.

Moving on, to the more general complaint, Nancy Hutchison has already used my name elsewhere in a violation of any right to privacy that I may have expected, so there was little point in my not using my name really was there? I think perhaps it's less than fair however to let that poor avionics engineers visage and C.V. stand for all to see, and possibly be confused with my self.

Whilst I take the well made point that if you don't want your details spread far and wide than you shouldn't use services like linkedin, or faecalbook, equally, I don't see how Kevin's posting is anything but malicious in it's intent. Designed as so many of his posts are, for some incomprehensible reason known only to himself specifically to annoy me. (something which he admitted to in black and white on the cosmic token a while back).

I'm already "pre-annoyed by life" and I don't need some jerk winding me up seemingly for luis's pleasure. I'm not putting up with it, but it still doesn't seem fair that that poor bloke's profile should be used as a pawn in hobbits childish games either..

But you run your site as you want Mikado. If I don't like it or you don't like me, I don't have to stay and slug it out.

In the mean time, I'd like to get back to the science and the humour. I can see the there are five Non-science and non humorous posts above this one but I can't read em! Wonderful!

FB.

Anyone got a sick bucket...again.
Note to Myself,
Stop reading such utter ballocks.
Kevin

[kevin]

All good stuff.

I don't actually want the fight. I feel that Kevin "provokes" me, and it's obviously a character weakness that causes me to respond, which I have now taken care of by using the "foes" feature of the board.
I have decided that since after three years of reading his output none of it has been of use or seemingly posted with a good heart and so consequently I am better off ignoring it.

Moving on, to the more general complaint, Nancy Hutchison has already used my name elsewhere in a violation of any right to privacy that I may have expected, so there was little point in my not using my name really was there? I think perhaps it's less than fair however to let that poor avionics engineers visage and C.V. stand for all to see, and possibly be confused with my self.

Whilst I take the well made point that if you don't want your details spread far and wide than you shouldn't use services like linkedin, or faecalbook, equally, I don't see how Kevin's posting is anything but malicious in it's intent. Designed as so many of his posts are, for some incomprehensible reason known only to himself specifically to annoy me. (something which he admitted to in black and white on the cosmic token a while back).

I'm already "pre-annoyed by life" and I don't need some jerk winding me up seemingly for luis's pleasure. I'm not putting up with it, but it still doesn't seem fair that that poor bloke's profile should be used as a pawn in hobbits childish games either..

But you run your site as you want Mikado. If I don't like it or you don't like me, I don't have to stay and slug it out.

In the mean time, I'd like to get back to the science and the humour. I can see the there are five Non-science and non humorous posts above this one but I can't read em! Wonderful!

FB.

I take it that melud has stuck his head somewhere so He can't read My posts, but feels it OK to post utter drivel and lies about Myself.
At some point those who feel superior will begin to realise why I was given a name ...navigator.
Perhaps I can sense things others are too dense to .

I stand accused of been
1, "some jerk"
2, posting" malicious intent "content.
3,Designing posts to "annoy "
4,"prevokes"


The above is but a small segment of Fruitbats own little world that He has been fermenting for several years.
I managed to sidestep Him as best as possible, but as soon as Linda made him captain of the resolute , well it was the end of the hobbit.

I was quite prepared to simply GO, vanish off the scene , several things threw Me somewhat, Lindas continued ( obviously false) continued posts holding Me in Her highest regard etc.
I began to wake up with the most vivid of messages of a door slamming in My face with a message on it saying ...clear off, not welcome here.

At the self same time I was struggling to access the ishstarsgate forum, and eventually succummed to e-mail to ishtar who explained She had shut the gate for a rest.
Thus GATE and DOOR threw Me a bit.
But the message continued.
Myles ( the ASSassin) arrival also threw a spanner in the works of Me vanishing, as I wanted to explain to Linda and all others why, and say goodbye with respect.
Myles the assasin should be given a medal for loging out speed.

Thus I am now here....not what SOMEONE planned, that someone was Linda.A.L nee Brown.
She is the one been driven like a horse pulling a carriage, but chooses instead to blame anyone else who dares to stand up and contradict Her.
Then it's "OFF WITH THEIR HEADS"
She is the queen in Alice in wonderland.
Which I always realised.

All that was needed was ONE honest request by Linda for Me to leave.
I knew with how fruitbat has been boiling the little pot of distrust about Myself that My continued membership was untenable.
Fairy snuff would have been My answer.
But NO.
What an utter let down Linda is....now totally and irreversably IRRELEVENT to Me.
To use a blue type word.
Kevin