by Mikado14 » Sat Sep 12, 2015 11:18 am
So Andy, there was a one video where he was being interviewed by a woman back in the early '00s. It was close to an hour long. I believe that they conquered the manipulation of time and found a way to project via a you tube. That hour seemed like 6 hours.
I also viewed a presentation he made, I believe it was the same interviewer, in regard to a film of what he purported to be a UFO/black ops aircraft/experimental craft in the vicinity of Area 51. He name drops, as he is prone, without giving any supportive evidence of any type. Sound familiar? One could get the impression that the speaker is after notoriety. It all centers around the information they gave out without the source and they become the "sought after source" thus ensuring the notoriety they so desperately seek. Sound familiar?
I too found some of his information to be in error, not only from lab experience but with established and presented papers of Brown. IF he is correct, as he claims to be from information written by Brown, then there is a serious dichotomy that exists with Brown's work. In other words, it may appear as if Brown contradicts himself.
I had a conversation with someone recently on the phone. Individuals who continually present the lifter as proof of Biefeld-Brown only serve to substantiate the mythos surrounding Brown. Building a lifter, is an inexpensive experiment one can perform that on the surface appears to defy established science but has been proven that the primary reaction that is being demonstrated is easily explained via electrophoretic means. These individuals usually are mesmerized into seeing something operate out of their normal range of understanding and interpret what they see improperly.
Have you ever noticed that those that purport the lifter to be Biefeld-Brown have no real educational experience in established science? If one doesn't have a good grasp on "established science" then how are they to recognize anything that does not fit into that realm?
Even Raymond, who had no post high school education knew that the lifter was not electrogravitics.
Mikado
The thing about Inner Circles is that they are like Boxes - difficult to think outside of them.
"When the Debate is Lost, Slander is the Tool of the Loser" SOCRATES
“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
