Well Kim just read to me excerpts from a post from Linda. I am not going to rebut but I will make a few comments. I am sure someone will take them to her or she will find a public WiFi.
When you signed the contract with Paul, your life became public. All those on the ttbrown forum did not join that forum with the intent of their personal lives being made public. Neither did anyone who met you face to face. Unfortunately, you stories and fabrications as well as your behind the scenes manipulations hurt many individuals as well as your inherent inability to tell the truth. It took years but others found out the individual that you can be. You can coat a turd with honey but it still has a stinky center.
You are doing exactly what others, including myself, have said. When caught in a fabricated and unfounded statement such as Kim burning Raymond's papers and then the subsequent question from fruitbat as to how you know they were burned (actually he wished to know why Kim would burn them), you deflect any interrogatories in regard to what you claimed and refrain from giving any substantive answers. You then go on the offensive and demand proof from others to counter your fabricated statements. You stand on your little soapbox, in your pinafore dress with hands on hips and attempt to scream louder than anyone to include those who you have lied about demanding they need to prove that you lied. You never state where you received your information mind you, for you are not accountable for what you say, however, others must prove you wrong. Mostly, those around you ignore your statements of perceived facts the same as they would to those of a lower IQ or what one might refer to as a slow individual.
As to your claim that my work was not mine. First, you need to clarify for you have stated that I have done nothing and have been lying. Now you state that I stole Andy's work and your Father's work. Which is it Linda? Can you see how you make statements that are diametrically opposed which shows your vacillating ability between truth and lie? As a note to what you have said, therefore every engineer that ever used any of Maxwell's equations or Heaviside's or Ohm or Ampere or Coulomb or Faraday....and the list goes....all stole from these people. Your such an ass and you prove you will make any statement in an attempt to demean or defame whilst upholding your exemplary moral standard (sarcasm intended).
It was agreed in 2008, if you will recall, to use what Andy called the "Wall Street" papers as a starting point. The Mark I Gravitor was based upon that. I have always stated that. However, what was learned from that afforded the Mark II and then the Mark III. Andy can testify the work we did on our own paralleled some his. I take that as a confirmation that what we did was spot on and it further reinforced what Andy did since results are similar. Since neither of us were involved our results substantiated each other. You are such a twit for you don't see the seriousness in the experiments and the results to date and how his work and our work had similar results.
You have a third party.....ask Rose or her husband. They both saw the Gravitors, Mark I and Mark III. That is, if you would believe them but then you don't believe anyone.
You want someone who is a third party look at Raymond's books and papers? I will meet Dave at the infamous McDonald's and show him. Should take no more than 5 minutes....and I will even buy him a cup of coffee. I don't expect it will happen but it should for he would be the only one you would trust....that is....if you are both in contact with each other.
Mikado
PS: fruitbat.....a wastrel is a good for nothing person, wasteful, a loafer....is that how you really see yourself? No wonder you associate with Linda.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/wastrel