Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

The Hypocritical actions of the Nickel Site that serve to substantiate the lying actions of Linda Brown (that would be the Cosmic Token so all can she how deranged Linda Brown can be)

Re: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

Postby kevin » Thu Dec 10, 2015 2:30 pm

wags wrote:
Mikado14 wrote:Do they have catfish in England? I don't know.....um....I am referring to the aquatic version. Of the other, hell, the Internet is proliferated with them.
[/]
Yes, though I am not a fisherman. A fish to avoid then, as they only get thrown back; or is that the other definition.

We have the Wels catfish here...
http://www.catfishing-uk.com/

Cat tells Me She hasn't the stomach anymore for these two forums....shame.

They are enormous in France and spain ...hundreds of pounds in weight.

I have a hefty drunk dog on My hands at the moment, She likes beer, especially Yorkshire beer, John Smiths of Tadcaster.
Flat out drunk at the mo.
Kevin
kevin
The Hobbit
 
Posts: 2901
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

Postby Mikado14 » Thu Dec 10, 2015 2:48 pm

yeah, we have them that big in some parts of the US, especially in the south.

As to Cat, in some way, I can see her point.

Mikado
The thing about Inner Circles is that they are like Boxes - difficult to think outside of them.

"When the Debate is Lost, Slander is the Tool of the Loser" SOCRATES

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Mikado14
Commander
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:38 am
Location: Located where I want to be...or not...depends on the day.

Re: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

Postby Mikado14 » Fri Dec 11, 2015 11:42 am

Mikado14 wrote:Well kevin, fruitbat wants lies? Here are a few I managed to throw together:


1. David Smith is Morgan (at least six individuals have been told this)

2. Harold (last name witheld) is twigsnapper (at least four individuals have been told this)

3. Helen Towt's accident was a hit and run (posted on the ttbrown forum) when clearly the record states it was an accident
.
4. She used the photo of Brenden Kelly as that of Morgan and gave it to a group of individuals (Many references to this on the forum. Photo given and shown to different individuals)

5. Terry Lee Brewer is a character named Livingston and was part of an elite group that traveled in time correcting "things" (sounds like Quantum Leap which is exactly what would be required to believe her stories). His obituary states no military service what so ever, however, there is a flag at his memorial which would indicate such. http://www.schoolerfuneralhome.com/obit ... 47454d2ec7
However, since Morgan was identified as Dave Smith and that is a lie then any associations attributed to him are a lie as well.

6. Myles - first a blind dog...then a miraculously seeing dog...then her lawyer staying at her house...and now just her lawyer (this last one might be true seeing as she uses real individuals to pattern into her imaginary characters)

7. Her Father jumped out of the NA 337 of which the facts contradict. (numerous references to this on several forums)

8. Her Father was shot in Germany. (refer to the above)

9. Martin Calloway urinated on a wall back in time as stated on the ttbrown forum. (This is impossible see reference #1 above and was a comment made by Morgan)

10. Twigsnapper stated that "items" were saved from a museum in Irag prior to it's burning/destruction. (refer to #2)

I could go on but what's the use. We have been down this road before. The above list has been stated before and others have corroborated them and yet it would appear that blindness is trait not only with little dogs but with others.

One item should be mentioned. Throughout the Due-Diligence, there has only been cries of objection without any opposing references to the contrary. Only innuendo and derogatory comments as a counter. In a roundabout manner of interpreting those actions, one could assume that "someone" has been caught in a lie. With that said, she offers only the aforesaid objections and no substance to either support the Due-Diligence or to offer counter evidence then the only conclusion that can be had on the instant is that she is a conspirator with those lying or is the source.

And one more item, she has never explained the multiple individuals from the same IP address. She has never explained Hog Island and wildcard from the History Channel forum having the same IP address. Aversion is not lying. Silence implies knowledge.

In looking at the demands for a statement of lies, this is coming from someone who has not been around this work of fiction seasoned with some truths for the past ten years. These current individuals have had no interaction of a physical nature with anyone involved but yet rely on the words of someone over the Internet/email/PM.

Linda....the catfish (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=catfish)

Mikado



Kim pointed out something to me. I want to add.

11. Saying that she doesn't know how to post a link but can easily post a link to facebook.

12. Claiming that she cannot post a photo and have someone else do so but how does she get the photo to the person to post? Smells like a lie to me.


....and the list can go on.....and as time passes, she will only add to it.

Have enough yet fruitbat?

Mikado
The thing about Inner Circles is that they are like Boxes - difficult to think outside of them.

"When the Debate is Lost, Slander is the Tool of the Loser" SOCRATES

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Mikado14
Commander
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:38 am
Location: Located where I want to be...or not...depends on the day.

Re: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

Postby Mikado14 » Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:20 pm

Kim was reading at another site that fruitbat posted on. She asked me about something he said so I told her to send it to me.

fruitbat wrote:Some encryption though cannot be broken. A pub quiz goes: Here's a series of numbers: 1 5 8 13 34 45 the traditional question is than asked "which is the odd one out, and why"?


This is the interesting part. In the post, he is discussing encryption and the implementation of shift registers. The culmination of his post is the above sentence. Here is a beginning to the solution:

First, each of the numbers need to be converted to binary (8 bit):

00000001 = 1
00000101 = 5
00001000 = 8
00001101 = 13
00010010 = 34
00011101 = 45

The problem in looking for the answer is that the question isn't fair. One needs to have the encryption key, which is usually the first binary group transmitted. Since the majority of the numbers are odd based then there are two numbers that are even (decimal). However, if looking at the binary count there are three that are even (number of ones). Looking at the overall comparison of binary to decimal there is only one that is both even in binary and even in decimal.....

34

Now this is just looking at the numbers from one point of view and using supposition but without the encryption key, it is only a guess. Not a very fair question and anyone that would posit this in a pub is either looking to stump individuals who have no knowledge of the source of the question or are looking to feel superior to others. That is my opinion only for even the "fork in the road" riddle can be solved and to posit a riddle or question as this, which requires outside information not provided is wrong....unless you are in a classroom to portray the difficulties with encryption.

Again, my opinion.

Mikado
The thing about Inner Circles is that they are like Boxes - difficult to think outside of them.

"When the Debate is Lost, Slander is the Tool of the Loser" SOCRATES

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Mikado14
Commander
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:38 am
Location: Located where I want to be...or not...depends on the day.

Re: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

Postby Chris Knight » Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:32 pm

Wish I had the time to list the vast catalogue of lies told to me b y Linda Leach beginning when I met her when I was 19 years old. Some of the funnier stories I posted when I first came on this forum.

Thanks to J for forwarding me the posts regarding "The Townsend Brown Effect" and the Townsend Brown Foundation, both collabirations of Linda Leach and myself - her ideas initially, but my thousands of dollars in costs, of course. She never had a pot to pee in.


Classic Linda Leach - after pulling it all together, she blew her lid both time, telling me to cancel what I had completed and effectively wasting my, and my family's money, time, and energy. I was too drunk on the koolaid to see the situation for what it was.

My advice, which is still free, is to get away from that woman. If you are interacting with her you are part of the problem. Seriously, you people should be intelligent enough to see the truth when the facts have been continuously presented to you...unless, of course, you prefer to be willfully ignorant of the truth.

Cheers,

Andy
You want a diamond ring ? I can get it for you.
You want a thingy-thing ? I can get it for you.
User avatar
Chris Knight
Lt. Commander
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:56 am
Location: East Coast

Re: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

Postby Mikado14 » Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:46 pm

Andy,

Everyone has told lies in their lifetime. Anyone who states otherwise is a liar. However, it is the intent in making the lie that is the crux of the matter. In the case of Linda Leach, she has never proved any of her statements that I can recall. The Due-Diligence gave references and citations and yet nothing from Linda, Morgan or twigsnapper other than derogatory comment directed at the messenger/presenter of the facts/references in a feeble attempt to discredit.

There will always be those thirsty for the Kool-Aid, all anyone can do who has drunk of it is to state their story. Those that drink of it are more than likely gullible as we were and that, I am not afraid to admit just as you are not afraid to admit and some others on here as well.

What I find curious is that someone would ask/demand a list when the evidence is right out there. Have they read the book "Defying Gravity"? Probably not. Therefore the Due-Diligence is pointless. How about Blue? How about Myles, to name a few.

Oh well....may the force be with you.

Mikado
The thing about Inner Circles is that they are like Boxes - difficult to think outside of them.

"When the Debate is Lost, Slander is the Tool of the Loser" SOCRATES

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Mikado14
Commander
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:38 am
Location: Located where I want to be...or not...depends on the day.

Re: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

Postby wags » Fri Dec 11, 2015 12:56 pm

Mikado14 wrote:Kim was reading at another site that fruitbat posted on. She asked me about something he said so I told her to send it to me.

fruitbat wrote:Some encryption though cannot be broken. A pub quiz goes: Here's a series of numbers: 1 5 8 13 34 45 the traditional question is than asked "which is the odd one out, and why"?


This is the interesting part. In the post, he is discussing encryption and the implementation of shift registers. The culmination of his post is the above sentence. Here is a beginning to the solution:

First, each of the numbers need to be converted to binary (8 bit):

00000001 = 1
00000101 = 5
00001000 = 8
00001101 = 13
00010010 = 34
00011101 = 45

The problem in looking for the answer is that the question isn't fair. One needs to have the encryption key, which is usually the first binary group transmitted. Since the majority of the numbers are odd based then there are two numbers that are even (decimal). However, if looking at the binary count there are three that are even (number of ones). Looking at the overall comparison of binary to decimal there is only one that is both even in binary and even in decimal.....

34

Now this is just looking at the numbers from one point of view and using supposition but without the encryption key, it is only a guess. Not a very fair question and anyone that would posit this in a pub is either looking to stump individuals who have no knowledge of the source of the question or are looking to feel superior to others. That is my opinion only for even the "fork in the road" riddle can be solved and to posit a riddle or question as this, which requires outside information not provided is wrong....unless you are in a classroom to portray the difficulties with encryption.

Again, my opinion.

Mikado


It can be 13 but it is obscure math reason to do with database location encryption. Your answer Mikado though is more likely as my answer is very obscure.
Boswell : ‘I have provided you with an argument, but I am not obliged to supply an understanding"
User avatar
wags
Commander
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:46 am
Location: South Saxons Kingdom, Angleland

Re: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

Postby KarenAnn23 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:12 pm

Marking my reading at 54, I have a lot to say about what I felt during many times on this board as I have not contributed much or anything to others on this subject, maybe when I thought I was making the "difference" by phoning a member about something I was warned about and told to look out for..I was enticed to say more then I might have. I make No excuse for my own behavior !! I did what at the time I felt was right. And to You my old friend I now apologize. I Should have said No Thing !

I wish that I had kept up with all that was going on here but I was on about my own thing. I hope to find what I first wanted to learn, but I haven't the stamina/nerve to say more now. I said I'd pick no sides before and I will assume that now. But, Anyone from the complete outside who doesn't understand, there are reasons why this is happening and legit reasons and research and real science that we could all get back to.

Only, I wish I could get back to it ! I had hoped that I'd find a place that I could talk to others about what I think are important things and relevant in the main topic. So, Good Luck to all and I'm sure to check in soon.

KarenAnn
KarenAnn23
Cabin Girl
 
Posts: 907
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:48 am

Re: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

Postby Mikado14 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:22 pm

KarenAnn23 wrote:Marking my reading at 54, I have a lot to say about what I felt during many times on this board as I have not contributed much or anything to others on this subject, maybe when I thought I was making the "difference" by phoning a member about something I was warned about and told to look out for..I was enticed to say more then I might have. I make No excuse for my own behavior !! I did what at the time I felt was right. And to You my old friend I now apologize. I Should have said No Thing !

I wish that I had kept up with all that was going on here but I was on about my own thing. I hope to find what I first wanted to learn, but I haven't the stamina/nerve to say more now. I said I'd pick no sides before and I will assume that now. But, Anyone from the complete outside who doesn't understand, there are reasons why this is happening and legit reasons and research and real science that we could all get back to.

Only, I wish I could get back to it ! I had hoped that I'd find a place that I could talk to others about what I think are important things and relevant in the main topic. So, Good Luck to all and I'm sure to check in soon.

KarenAnn



I am not sure I follow you. How is this relevant to what was being said in the previous posts.

KarenAnn, you can post anything you want. I answered you in a thread that I believe you started in an effort to answer you. I saw you were having a conversation with kevin and you answered him. kevin checks in everyday and more than likely hasn't checked in since you posted for afterall, he is 5 hours ahead of us and it is currently as I type this, after midnight. He might very well be in bed.

You can talk about anything you want, I have said this to you but remember, things you might think are important might not be important to someone else and vice versa.

If you feel you are not being answered quickly enough and you wish to move on, that is your choice and I too wish you luck. However, perhaps you should slow done and give individuals a chance to answer you. I saw you were discussing ley lines and magnetic lines with kevin. I don't necessarily find them a hot topic or interesting at this time but I have discussed them previously. Ohio has several ley lines, here is a link to one:

http://www.sacred-destinations.com/usa/serpent-mound

Mikado
The thing about Inner Circles is that they are like Boxes - difficult to think outside of them.

"When the Debate is Lost, Slander is the Tool of the Loser" SOCRATES

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Mikado14
Commander
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:38 am
Location: Located where I want to be...or not...depends on the day.

Re: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

Postby KarenAnn23 » Tue Dec 15, 2015 9:21 pm

You can talk about anything you want, I have said this to you but remember, things you might think are important might not be important to someone else and vice versa.


MR. Mikado, please try to understand that what I was trying to talk to Kevin about and what I was/am trying to say to you now are entirely different. I mean no offence. Please don't take it that way. I don't remember saying that I'd move on if I were not answered quickly :) I don't wish to move on, if this is your way of saying so please do.

I understand if you are upset at me, but as you have proven you do know and understand what and where I have put my comments up..I'd like to clear some air..However, I will not do so on this thread out of respect and I'm sorry to have brought it up here. Please, excuse a laymen !
KarenAnn23
Cabin Girl
 
Posts: 907
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:48 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Cosmic Hypocrite



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron