Honest answers to fruitbat
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2016 10:56 pmI have been away for awhile and have not been reading the forum due to not being near a computer. I am going to answer fruitbat as to what he has expressed both to what wags has written and to the link that kevin referenced elsewhere.
Fruitbat,
You stated something about "victory conditions". This must be a manner of speech that is from your culture. I am not looking for a "victory". I am looking for peace. It was in July of 2010 that I believed there would be peace. Linda and I met at the McDonalds in Phoenixville in July of 2010. We agreed to go our separate ways and that was that. I hugged her and I wished her luck when we parted. It was short lived for in the beginning of August, she started attacking me in small ways with barbs. I rebutted her. I talked to a lawyer about the slander that she was posting and it was on his recommendation that Linda was removed as an admin. I did this after she posted that Kim took drugs (she recanted and said at a later date that she was referring to "prescription drugs" but you and I both know that she intentionally said what she said and only recanted as an after thought). And the rest is history.
Who started it? She did. I agreed to walk away. If she would have stuck by her agreement, she would not only own this site, which she would have gotten at the expiration of the term with the hosting site in January of 2012, she would also own the domain name when it came time for renewal in April of the same year. I believe it should be apparent as to why that never happened.
Therefore, the answer to what you consider "victory conditions", if you mean what would it take to end this, I have stated this on many occasions. She shut ups and not mentions myself or comments about myself or anything in connection with my life or those in my life, then I too will follow suit. It is really that simple. No money....no contracts.....no NDA's or agreements.....her inaction would cause my inaction. Nothing more, nothing less since she has proved that her word is about as valuable as a tit on a boarhog thus her not doing a thing will get me not doing a thing. I call it, the reap what you sow derivative. If she sows no comments, she will reap no comments from me.
On to the next question/misinformed statement. You seem to be under the illusion that Kim is the owner of the Hut. Not anymore. When the Hut was first started in the spring of 2009, Kim was listed as the owner of the domain name. It was explained to Linda so that she would be anonymous and leave her personal information from being public and I didn't want my personal information out there either. Kim's address was on a house we shared in Reading, PA. However, my address was different that I used for identification. As to the Quonset Hut (the domain owner and a site owner can be two different entities, usually, there is a license agreement involved), there was no listed owner and the original site was Mid Valley Hosting in Oregon. Since Fred knew the owner personally, we didn't go through the normal contracts. Around 2011, the ownership of the domain name was changed to my cousin Alex and it was explained to Linda why this was being done. When my cousin passed away, it was in his will to be left to an entity. It is currently owned by that entity (registered in the state of Pennsylvania). The registration is listed as Private with GoDaddy. Now, there you have the truth. It may not be what Linda has been wholesaling to the public but it is the truth and I have not ever written it before. I am sure she has Googled it and found it to be listed as private but she still insists on telling everyone that Kim owns it. Google it yourself, you'll see that it is listed as private and if you really want more, my cousins last name was Biddle and he died in 2012....yes....those Biddles. As to the entities name, it is listed and registered with the Department of Revenue, Corporations Bureau and it is not relative to anything in regard to the Token. If you need to correspond with the entity for business purposes, I would be happy to forward them for you at the present.
As to packages, yes, I sent a package to wags. The reason was that he didn't know what grits were. I said that I would send him some. I also included some "TastyKakes" which is unique to the Philadelphia area (they may have been a little stale by the time he received them). I did this merely as an act of friendship. Very similar to information that was promised to you if you promised to keep it secret to yourself to be used for your experiments that you said you would not agree to. You too could have had a package. In fact, Kim was talking about sending wags another package which was due to a comment he made. You see, friends do this, they may send things to each other and that is the truth in that. I even invited him to the US and in fact, your invited to. I would be more than happy to invite you to the next MidEast Conference as my guest, just as I did to wags. You might enjoy yourself.
And now about the paper burnings. Here is the original post:
I want you to notice the dates. I also want you to notice who/whom Kim is talking with. Kim was not talking about getting rid of anything that belonged to Raymond, it was data sets from my work. I allowed this continue after Linda started claiming that Kim burned Ray's papers. The reality was that they were papers "for" Raymond. I kept the ruse up and allowed Kim to keep doing the ruse after Linda first claimed it a good while ago knowing full well it was wrong. I should have corrected it then but allowed Linda to run with her throttle out making statements and claiming that she had it on good authority etc. Also, I have been told that Linda is claiming that the books shown are Raymonds' Assert books. Yes, one of the photos is the Assert book. The other is the book he compiled and gave to me in Vegas in 2008. I also stated previously that there were papers that are loose and not bindered but I did not photo them and I stated such along with the photos. And now you have the truth in regard to the papers.
Now, as to your comment about "alleged". Kim's son is gone, nothing alleged. There is nothing to tell. However, why is this so important to Linda? She was at the house we had in Reading, although she stayed in the Suburban while Dave and I went in, she saw his ashes in the necklace that Kim wears everyday. She was here first hand in June of 2010 and saw "things" to attribute to the event. See can't even remember his name but feels compelled to comment. I feel as if this "explanation" is only satisfying some morbid game started by Linda and continued by you as if important on some level. Let me say, truthfully, it is not relevant to anything either on the Token or on the Hut and I will say no more. How would you respond if someone said, "the alleged death of Blackjack"?...and he was just your cat and not your son.
As to Kim's being ill. She is terminal. We see Doctors several times a month. Does that have any bearing on the Token or the Hut? No, it does not. I believe that somewhere, I don't feel like looking it up, I made a post about her illness. It was made to be honest and open and for no reason other than that. Kim is quite capable of holding her own with Linda or with anyone. She may be quiet from the forums for a while and that is why I made the post. As far as how long she has, the Doctors are not specific. She is at stage two of four stages. Her disease is called PBC, Primary Biliary Cholangitis. The bile ducts become inflamed and the bile will eventually attack the liver. She is in pain almost daily and it affects a good deal of other parts of her body. She has developed diabetes from it as well as chronic gastritis and now breathing problems. They have estimated that she has between 5 and 10 years at most before a transplant. The good news is that she was taken off the transplant list for the time being. Those are the highlights. As a parting question, what business is it of anyone on the Token as far as it applying to Brown and his work and/or anything with Linda? My response is nothing.
This is in response to those here that you call haters. Here is a truth. Look at the forums here and on the Token. Who posts first? Who posts second? In other words, who makes first comment and who makes the response? Who copies from here the most and refuses to include a link? (and it is not fair use, look up what fair use is) Who claims that this site is a cesspool and is through with it but continues to copy and post?
If you can, are you capable of truthfully answering the above questions?
If I have missed a question, speak soon or I will not answer and leave you to assume the truth or listen to the ill informed truth of someone else. But ask yourself this, in the past months, how much have I posted in regard to Linda versus how much she has posted about just myself and then, look at how much has been posted about her in the same time frame by others and how much she has posted about others. I believe, if your honest with yourself, as to where the largest numbers lie.
As to picking on a 70 year old lady. Perhaps if you have answered the questions that I posed above, you will see the truth and the fallacy in your statement.
Mikado
Fruitbat,
You stated something about "victory conditions". This must be a manner of speech that is from your culture. I am not looking for a "victory". I am looking for peace. It was in July of 2010 that I believed there would be peace. Linda and I met at the McDonalds in Phoenixville in July of 2010. We agreed to go our separate ways and that was that. I hugged her and I wished her luck when we parted. It was short lived for in the beginning of August, she started attacking me in small ways with barbs. I rebutted her. I talked to a lawyer about the slander that she was posting and it was on his recommendation that Linda was removed as an admin. I did this after she posted that Kim took drugs (she recanted and said at a later date that she was referring to "prescription drugs" but you and I both know that she intentionally said what she said and only recanted as an after thought). And the rest is history.
Who started it? She did. I agreed to walk away. If she would have stuck by her agreement, she would not only own this site, which she would have gotten at the expiration of the term with the hosting site in January of 2012, she would also own the domain name when it came time for renewal in April of the same year. I believe it should be apparent as to why that never happened.
Therefore, the answer to what you consider "victory conditions", if you mean what would it take to end this, I have stated this on many occasions. She shut ups and not mentions myself or comments about myself or anything in connection with my life or those in my life, then I too will follow suit. It is really that simple. No money....no contracts.....no NDA's or agreements.....her inaction would cause my inaction. Nothing more, nothing less since she has proved that her word is about as valuable as a tit on a boarhog thus her not doing a thing will get me not doing a thing. I call it, the reap what you sow derivative. If she sows no comments, she will reap no comments from me.
On to the next question/misinformed statement. You seem to be under the illusion that Kim is the owner of the Hut. Not anymore. When the Hut was first started in the spring of 2009, Kim was listed as the owner of the domain name. It was explained to Linda so that she would be anonymous and leave her personal information from being public and I didn't want my personal information out there either. Kim's address was on a house we shared in Reading, PA. However, my address was different that I used for identification. As to the Quonset Hut (the domain owner and a site owner can be two different entities, usually, there is a license agreement involved), there was no listed owner and the original site was Mid Valley Hosting in Oregon. Since Fred knew the owner personally, we didn't go through the normal contracts. Around 2011, the ownership of the domain name was changed to my cousin Alex and it was explained to Linda why this was being done. When my cousin passed away, it was in his will to be left to an entity. It is currently owned by that entity (registered in the state of Pennsylvania). The registration is listed as Private with GoDaddy. Now, there you have the truth. It may not be what Linda has been wholesaling to the public but it is the truth and I have not ever written it before. I am sure she has Googled it and found it to be listed as private but she still insists on telling everyone that Kim owns it. Google it yourself, you'll see that it is listed as private and if you really want more, my cousins last name was Biddle and he died in 2012....yes....those Biddles. As to the entities name, it is listed and registered with the Department of Revenue, Corporations Bureau and it is not relative to anything in regard to the Token. If you need to correspond with the entity for business purposes, I would be happy to forward them for you at the present.
As to packages, yes, I sent a package to wags. The reason was that he didn't know what grits were. I said that I would send him some. I also included some "TastyKakes" which is unique to the Philadelphia area (they may have been a little stale by the time he received them). I did this merely as an act of friendship. Very similar to information that was promised to you if you promised to keep it secret to yourself to be used for your experiments that you said you would not agree to. You too could have had a package. In fact, Kim was talking about sending wags another package which was due to a comment he made. You see, friends do this, they may send things to each other and that is the truth in that. I even invited him to the US and in fact, your invited to. I would be more than happy to invite you to the next MidEast Conference as my guest, just as I did to wags. You might enjoy yourself.
And now about the paper burnings. Here is the original post:
Kim wrote:Re: Accuracy is missing
Postby Kim » Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:31 pm
Peetee le trickfox wrote:
I don't mind the occasional negative comments you may make regarding our dearly departed Mikado, however PLEASE let this fencing die down as best as it can...
Dearly departed? Am I reading this right Raymond or is this just your wish? It is soooo amusing to me how two-faced you are. Hmmmm now you have a new name, two-face, sounds appropriate. and I WILL work on Mikado so you do NOT get the data that he put together and has sitting here for you. You have shown your true colors in this yourself. As a matter of fact I will get rid of them now, while he is indisposed, he will forgive me.
I want you to notice the dates. I also want you to notice who/whom Kim is talking with. Kim was not talking about getting rid of anything that belonged to Raymond, it was data sets from my work. I allowed this continue after Linda started claiming that Kim burned Ray's papers. The reality was that they were papers "for" Raymond. I kept the ruse up and allowed Kim to keep doing the ruse after Linda first claimed it a good while ago knowing full well it was wrong. I should have corrected it then but allowed Linda to run with her throttle out making statements and claiming that she had it on good authority etc. Also, I have been told that Linda is claiming that the books shown are Raymonds' Assert books. Yes, one of the photos is the Assert book. The other is the book he compiled and gave to me in Vegas in 2008. I also stated previously that there were papers that are loose and not bindered but I did not photo them and I stated such along with the photos. And now you have the truth in regard to the papers.
Now, as to your comment about "alleged". Kim's son is gone, nothing alleged. There is nothing to tell. However, why is this so important to Linda? She was at the house we had in Reading, although she stayed in the Suburban while Dave and I went in, she saw his ashes in the necklace that Kim wears everyday. She was here first hand in June of 2010 and saw "things" to attribute to the event. See can't even remember his name but feels compelled to comment. I feel as if this "explanation" is only satisfying some morbid game started by Linda and continued by you as if important on some level. Let me say, truthfully, it is not relevant to anything either on the Token or on the Hut and I will say no more. How would you respond if someone said, "the alleged death of Blackjack"?...and he was just your cat and not your son.
As to Kim's being ill. She is terminal. We see Doctors several times a month. Does that have any bearing on the Token or the Hut? No, it does not. I believe that somewhere, I don't feel like looking it up, I made a post about her illness. It was made to be honest and open and for no reason other than that. Kim is quite capable of holding her own with Linda or with anyone. She may be quiet from the forums for a while and that is why I made the post. As far as how long she has, the Doctors are not specific. She is at stage two of four stages. Her disease is called PBC, Primary Biliary Cholangitis. The bile ducts become inflamed and the bile will eventually attack the liver. She is in pain almost daily and it affects a good deal of other parts of her body. She has developed diabetes from it as well as chronic gastritis and now breathing problems. They have estimated that she has between 5 and 10 years at most before a transplant. The good news is that she was taken off the transplant list for the time being. Those are the highlights. As a parting question, what business is it of anyone on the Token as far as it applying to Brown and his work and/or anything with Linda? My response is nothing.
This is in response to those here that you call haters. Here is a truth. Look at the forums here and on the Token. Who posts first? Who posts second? In other words, who makes first comment and who makes the response? Who copies from here the most and refuses to include a link? (and it is not fair use, look up what fair use is) Who claims that this site is a cesspool and is through with it but continues to copy and post?
If you can, are you capable of truthfully answering the above questions?
If I have missed a question, speak soon or I will not answer and leave you to assume the truth or listen to the ill informed truth of someone else. But ask yourself this, in the past months, how much have I posted in regard to Linda versus how much she has posted about just myself and then, look at how much has been posted about her in the same time frame by others and how much she has posted about others. I believe, if your honest with yourself, as to where the largest numbers lie.
As to picking on a 70 year old lady. Perhaps if you have answered the questions that I posed above, you will see the truth and the fallacy in your statement.
Mikado
