Conclusions derived from information discovered during the the Due-Diligence. It should be noted that these conclusions are based upon fact from outside sources. These facts are the basis of any conclusions presented and as in any court of civil law, it is the preponderance of the evidence.
by wags » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:05 am
LB posted an item that piqued my interest, as it concerned an possible ancestor of TTB called Viscount Charles Toownshend and his involvement with the loss of the colonies the infamous Stamp Tax 1765. which is also known as the Tea Tax. In due Diligence I checked out the archive. It may be of interest to those predisposed to:
http://www.parliament.uk/about/living-h ... s-1763-67/
Boswell : ‘I have provided you with an argument, but I am not obliged to supply an understanding"
-
wags
- Commander
-
- Posts: 729
- Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:46 am
- Location: South Saxons Kingdom, Angleland
Return to A Preponderance of the Evidence
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests