You have my deepest condolences.
Mikado
wags wrote:Sadly my friend died of Cancer on Sunday night. Seeing her last week was a tough one but she is a lesson that ignoring the early symptoms by one year and relying on alternative methods alone is not a good idea.
I have no problem with the alternatives but Yesterday I heard that one of the people giving 'healing' was more concerned that there fee was paid than the actual death!
I find such an attitude quite frankly cruel to a family already grieving her loss. Be wary of those who present themselves as miracle workers, it just is not fair on anyone.
wags wrote:Nancy,
Do you think picking an argument with my post is what you felt was appropriate!
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:wags wrote:Nancy,
Do you think picking an argument with my post is what you felt was appropriate!
I am confused as to how you see my post as "picking argument".
I understand you are grieving. And acknowledged the pain of loosing those we love.
The SYSTEM insists on payment after a patient dies (whether by academic of alternative medicine).
it is the very system that will never "find a cure for cancer"
because they refuse to look at the Elephant in the room.
How can we understand what causes cancer, or death, if we do not understand life?
How can you and I communicate if you continually take offense to the words I use to try to find solutions?
Nancy
FM No Static At All wrote:Wags,
I am sorry for your loss and my prayers and meditations for the Soul/Spirit of your friend.
I saw nothing at all argumentative in what Nancy Hutchison stated about the system and fees, contrary to your assertions, she seemed to pointing out what most of us have been saying all along regarding cancer and all dis-eases of the human organ.
Perhaps when you are less stressed from grief you will go back and read her words again and see that their was no argument in them.
FM No Static At All wrote:Wags,
I am sorry for your loss and my prayers and meditations for the Soul/Spirit of your friend.
I saw nothing at all argumentative in what Nancy Hutchison stated about the system and fees, contrary to your assertions, she seemed to pointing out what most of us have been saying all along regarding cancer and all dis-eases of the human organ.
Perhaps when you are less stressed from grief you will go back and read her words again and see that their was no argument in them.
Mikado14 wrote:FM No Static At All wrote:Wags,
I am sorry for your loss and my prayers and meditations for the Soul/Spirit of your friend.
I saw nothing at all argumentative in what Nancy Hutchison stated about the system and fees, contrary to your assertions, she seemed to pointing out what most of us have been saying all along regarding cancer and all dis-eases of the human organ.
Perhaps when you are less stressed from grief you will go back and read her words again and see that their was no argument in them.
How about a simple "sorry for your losses" and some other wishes of sorrow. Now where in the post did I see any personal sympathy directed to wags' loss. I saw an immediate comment about "fees" and then statistics about cancer with a impersonal comment about losing those we love which then went into what appeared to be a series of rhetorical questions.
Perhaps that is why wags said what he did.
Just an observation
Mikado
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests