Soloma wrote:I cant help but ask, might we be able to tap this "transversal signal" ourselves through deep meditation and if so, might we not really need all of these machines?
Perhaps. Yes, perhaps.
What about people like Hobbit –
Dowsers - who “see” or ”hear” and “communicate” with “languages” the rest of us simply don’t ? I once saw a dowser at work – a teenage kid with rubber soled shoes – and it was unreal, and even frightening, to watch him with a shivering olive stick in his hands, walking thousands of square meters only to stop at a place and say “You drill here Mister, and you’ll have your water” ! Which I did drill and got, some 70 meters below ground.
What about Ed Wagner and his “W-waves” (I wrote about him here
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1158&start=30#p33649) which seemingly prove that trees “talk” among themselves with a standing wave formation and not “just interact chemically” for if one “
chop into a tree, you can see that adjacent trees put out an electrical pulse. This indicates they communicate directly” ?
What about Jonathan Goldman who, according to Watkins Review, is one of the 100 Most Spiritually Influential People in the World" and his “discovery” of “
a universal sound that, when intoned, can bring harmony and healing to ourselves” ? ( I wrote about him here
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1091#p31893)
W
hat about Aubrey de Grey and his Methuselah Foundation who claim
“old age is optional and why any rational being would choose it, is nuts” as I’ve mentioned out here ? (
viewtopic.php?f=51&t=1192&start=210#p34820)
And what about Priceton’s parapsychology research “PEAR” program which I talked about here (
viewtopic.php?f=51&t=1117&start=80#p34760) and which
proved that
1- “…
anomalous physical phenomena … are significantly correlated with such subjective variables as intention, meaning, resonance, and uncertainty”.2 – “ … the basic processes by which consciousness exchanges information with its environment, orders that information, and interprets it, also enable it to bias probabilistic systems and thereby to avail itself of some control over its reality”.3 – “ … quite normal expectations of bonded human/machine and human/human systems, and the door is opened for all manner of creative consciousness/environment interactions.4 – “ … most importantly, cogent representation of the merging of mental and material dimensions into indistinguishability at their deepest levels”.What to say about ALL that ?
- Well, PEAR scientists gave
one answer :
“….the door is opened for all manner of creative consciousness/environment interactions (and) nothing less than a generously expanded scientific model of reality, one that allows consciousness a proactive role in the establishment of its experience of the physical world, will be required”.
Is it only me that feel the hair on the back of my neck rise, at such an Answer ?
So yes Soloman, maybe we don’t need machines at all to tap a “signature” which seems to transverse everything. Everything.
And it seems some of us don’t, already.
Will you be one of them ?