FB
To be quite frank, and unmindful of social etiquette while at it, you are being quite an ass.
First and foremost, I'd ask you not make assumptions regarding myself. Why or what I do or don't do, is my business, not yours, so whenever in doubt or expectations over any of my actions or omissions, please be a gentleman ... and ask me about it. Do not assume. You will be wrong, most assuredly, for we, afterall and despite everything, don't know each other
that well.
And since you haven't asked, but expected my opinion nonetheless.
-
Yes, I think you have misjudged Hobbit
- And
Yes, I think you are using a simple post done by me as a "Casus Belli" to raise banners on unfinished business - you have not once, but twice, cited my supposed "derailment" as your Animus - as if that post, and the question from Hobbit it was supposed to answer, were irrelevant to your thread's topic.
-
No, it was not, far as I see it. More - and even worse - who knows (you don't) if it was some kind of a guy's peculiar way to extend a hand towards you. It did, just for the record, come to my mind. Water under the bridge, it is now.
- And
Yes, it is not the first time you use one measure and one tone towards some and quite different ones towards others. Your "Wags differendum" and its constricted sparring comes to mind, by comparison with the savage lashing you have - by now - twice inflicted on Hobbit. Your privilege, of course, to address decently those you like and diversely those you don't. But there ARE limits. As in, decency and Education limits.
- For
Yes, even I - who have been in time a most frequent target of your occasional fragile temper and consequent embarrassing bursts of rage - was not wished to befell any fatality as a "final solution" for my participating where you thought my absence was to be preferred.
-
And lastly,
No, not everything in you is confrontation ... except if done by Hobbit.
You wanted me to tell you something over this context ?
Hope you're satisfied. If not, by all means say so.
Lastly, and since I'm writing all this because you "expected me" to tell you something, and my silence was being "assumed" to also convey something when, in fact, nothing more sinister than being away with my Jacaranda was the reason - allow me a further sharing of thoughts :
a) To lose one's temper - frequently - is extreme bad form. To do it frequently over the same reason - or person - is extreme stupidity.
b) A sure way to derail one's intentions is to have done lousy research upon which one's course of action is decided.
c) The first article you cite in your answer to me dates from Feb. 2005 and since then a LOT of research, better done and better researched, has been done on THC and - more so, and to the point - on CBD.
d) The second one you cite
has 136 references behind it ... have you checked them all ? For instance, have you checked reference nr 15 (numbering from top)
http://www.cannabis-med.org/english/bul ... p?id=220#2 ? May I cite from it, to expedite my point ?
"Researchers found that the anti-tumour effects of CBD were caused by induction of apoptosis (programmed cell death). They concluded that their data "support the further testing of cannabidiol and cannabidiol-rich extracts for the potential treatment of cancer". e) Nevertheless, this second example and its background data was summarized by you with "
it suggest that THC does the bizzo", meaning, precisely the opposite of what 1 of those 136 references explicitly say. Will not others ? I have only checked this number 15, by chance, and it was a random choice (btw, I will check them all, in time).
f) Lastly, was your mention of Lakhovsky's machines and dealings with the Italians a fact related to your BJ thread and to your ?"
effort on looking for a solution to an urgent question" ? Or is it that since it was done by you, it can be dismissed as an attempt at derailment, and my answering it thereby not seen as me getting derailed and "
taking my eyes off the ball", but if done by another about Tumours - wich, incidently and unfortunately, your cat suffers from - then that surely is nothing but a solid case for hatred to be felt by you towards that intrusive and derailing poster ?
g) There comes a time when all of us have to muster the Ethics to rise from mistakes. That usually is initiated with a manly, and simple apology.
I could go on, you know.
But I respect your intellect, and you will surely have got my meaning in this here context, by now.
Which I could summarize like this - Stop being an ass, you're far better than to lose yourself in drama creation, and then try harder, much harder, to help your cat with better research, and finally, apologize publicly to whom you have publicly offended needlessly with such dark intentions. Oh and yes, this too - just a friendly tip - get a better hold on that temper of yours.
That said, and to get back on track after this long, off topic chit chat,
- If you've decided to give some CBD dominant oil to your cat, I think you're doing the right thing.
FWIW.
