Linda's Falsehoods

[Linda Brown]

Mikado,

You don't even know what is printed out on your own Forum. I suggest you get acquainted with your own words... or whoever was the Hutmaster under your control.

"The intent of this site was to promote and discuss the book(s) authored by Linda Brown, the work of her father, and other topics that are related to Dr. Brown's science and military careers. It is not intended to provide a forum for accusations, allegations, libel or slander.Notice that the proper quote is" books{s)"

You apparently don't even know what is on your own site.

Linda

[Linda Brown]

And looking at our conversations here from the HUTs point of view....(and its odd how we jumped off into a discussion of World War ll.).... I do feel that , if the HUT were a country...It is obvious that it was invaded by a force that laid the groundwork for that invasion early on....Its turncoats were put into place early so that when the time was right the entire situation came together as was planned.

Mikado kept blustering at me that he was going to "do something" that I was not going to like.... well... he was right.... and I was stupid for not seeing the situation before it was too late.

Some " papers" have bubbled to the surface.... as if they were intercepted couriers of information. And they need to be better analysed to figure what the overall plan is.... most of them are what Mikado himself has written.

First of all... when a country or organization is targeted for takeover the planners automatically take out the "figureheads"....... Mikado and his group actually called me that...And I have their voices on a recording. They would just leave me there on the HUT as the " Mascot"..... that was the word they actually used. Isn't that charming?

But suddenly the "mascot" started asking uncomfortable questions about their agenda and the operation of the Hut that they could not answer without being revealed.... so they switced to their next operation.... which was to discredit what I had to say and myself as a person. And oust me. And thats what has happened. All you have to do is read the HUT if you can get past the " password protected" barrier.

Now Mikado is saying that he can't wait to get rid of my contribution on the ttownsendbrown Forum so that he can get to more important business.

I haven't wanted to be there and have wanted him to remove my name from the membership roster but he has invented the idea of some kind of " contract" between us which conventiently he says keeps him from removing my name. I have said "Hogwash" to that and I have said it many times. Mikado has a reason for keeping me there and it has nothing to do with a non existant " contract".

And then there is the alteration of History. Mikado ( or Kim) deleted over 2000 messages so that no one can refer to them to prove any point. (He should know however that posts are never lost and there are those who can recapture anything. It makes for interesting reading for those who care.)

So some wonder why I can't seem to leave poor little Mikado alone? And why I seem driven to pursue this? Because I see who he is and what he represents.I have finally seen past his mask. He has managed to take over the HUT. If he thinks that there will not be an organized resistance to his moves he is wrong.

So much for my comment on World War ll history and the lessons learned from it.

And Mikado I am posting this on the Hut too. If you insist on keeping my membership active then you are going to have to deal with my comments. You may come along and erase them at Kims whim.... but enough will be reading them on the Token to know what is being put up there. Erasing them on the HUT will not do any good. And you only prove the point instead of honestly answering for your actions.

Linda

[Linda Brown]

And Mikado. If you believe your own words.... that I am such a liar.... then why does anything I say upset you at all? If you can call me a liar then certainly I can call you a traitor. Its all under the same banner , right? Linda

[Mikado14]

And Mikado. If you believe your own words.... that I am such a liar.... then why does anything I say upset you at all? If you can call me a liar then certainly I can call you a traitor. Its all under the same banner , right? Linda

No Linda, it is not under the same banner and a court will prove it eventually.

I can prove that you were the source for Morgan in Paul's book. I can prove you were twigsnapper. I can prove you were James Barrett ( just love the way you can create tears on demand, especially in a room in Vegas). As to anything else, well, you will have to wait.

Calling me a traitor? Traitor to what? Stories and fabrications? I would call it removing my support and dealing with reality. Do you realize how you sound when you talk about ALL these alphabet agencies that are watching the Hut? Watching me? Do you realize that I could use that as evidence against you?

You actually believe that you are some security risk that all these agencies are watching you. Well, if you really were then why hasn't Andrew done ANYTHING after 20 plus years? He should have if he had ALL this information at his finger tips. I actually feel sorry for him in a way.....and for you regardless of your answer that will come saying not to be.

And you call me a "silly rabbit", if so, then what does that make you?

Mikado

[Linda Brown]

A fool for thinking that you had potential.

[Mikado14]

A fool for thinking that you had potential.

As Obi Wan Kenobi said "(paraphrasing) Who is more foolish, the fool or the fool that follows?" I stopped following for I do not wish to be a fool when the day ends.

Right you must be, no potential have I. (My best Yoda speak)

Mikado

[Mikado14]

Re: Regarding the HUT
by Linda Brown » Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:23 pm
I have left the HUT for good but I do have a parting shot. Mikado has been ranting about how he has been mislead..... HOW? Just because he has lost faith in himself and in others around him?.... that is not my problem.

Mikado... Did I ever ask you for any money? Did I ever expect you do do anything for me that would involve any kind of financial return?.... did I ever ask for any future " cut?"

How much do you think that I have spent going to all of these various meetings in support of your efforts? In fact.... I gave YOU money. You publically accepted it for use at Hut B. You say you have a contract. implied, with me. What do you call that? So who is committing fraud here?

I am sure that you are reading this. I doubt that you have the courage to address it. Linda

Parting shot? Never saw it other than your last post saying something about loving me. Well, I love all beings and I accept their foibles and faults and if I find them not of a moral fiber than I part in peace unlike you.

You presented individuals as someone they were not. How is that losing faith? I have said it on more than one occasion on this Hut and by the number of times you visit in any given day, I would have thought you would have read what it is I lost. I lost faith in YOU because of YOUR stories that were not true.

As to spending money, you are no where close to the amounts that I spent, sort of like a VW beetle from the 60's versus a Bugatti from today. As to the money YOU gave me, well, didn't you say that was for rent of the Winnebago? So, what is the truth Linda? You just continue to prove what I have been saying all along so perhaps that is your parting shot....proof of the fabricator you are for if you would consistently change your stories to fit your agenda of the day then one can only wonder how you would change it to tell a story to benefit yourself or your agenda.

There is no fraud Linda. Look up the definition. YOU are the fraud when it comes to your stories about Morgan, JD, twigsnapper, Hog Island and others. They are fabricated to tell a story. Who committed a fraud upon Paul? All you did was to tell him stories that he wrote about. So, he was the fraud based upon information you gave him. But now you have written a book of memoirs, you are the writer, you are telling the same stories so who is the fraud now?

You remind me of Bill Clinton and his definition for sex.

Mikado

[Mikado14]

And here is the basis for my statement.

Re: Regarding the HUT
by Linda Brown » Mon Dec 05, 2011 7:23 pm
This is to both of you Raymond and Hobbit.

The Shack writer makes mistakes. Note this

however, wasn't Dr. Brown at Bahnson's in '57? If so, how could he have been in two places at the same time? ....how can we believe your translations if you can't get the years correct? Aren't the years of the experiments in France within the documents you are translating? I find it hard to believe that Dr. Brown did not date the documents and who ever the scrivener of the documents was did not carry over the date. So sloppy work, so sloppy indeed if true.

Maybe Dad could be in two places at one time. They said the same of Stephenson too. But in this case he didn't have to be.

Mikado is just trying to discount you. Its the only style he has left.

But to try to discredit you Raymond is pretty silly. And sloppy is not quite the exact word for it.

Dad did not start at Bahnsons until the early fall of 1957.... the entire summer of that year he was working in Florida ON THE FRENCH MATERIAL.

So you were absolutely right Raymond. There is a difference here. You deserve an apology.
Linda

I take my information from the biographer of Townsend Brown:

The first trip to Europe in 1955 was relatively brief, only six days, all of them spent in
France (according to the passport). The best guess as to the purpose of the first trip is that
Dr. Brown went to France to discuss the specifications for the enormous vacuum
chamber, where he would finally be given an opportunity to test his electro-gravitic
apparatus in optimum conditions.

But from the additional fragments of information that we have managed to assemble, it
appears that those vacuum chamber tests are only one aspect of Dr. Brown’s travels in
1955 and 56.

“Starting NICAP” will be addressed in the next chapter. But “odd jobs” is a reference to
the understanding that Dr. Brown reached in order to finance the vacuum chamber
experiments he conducted in France: In exchange for the resources he needed to build a
chamber large enough to test his electro-gravitic theories, he agreed to lend a hand with
certain surveillance and espionage activities on the Caroline Group’s agenda. That
accounts for much of the time that he was in Europe, particularly during the second trip
in 1956.

Of course, there are no details to be found regarding either of Dr. Brown’s trips to Europe
in 1955 and 56 in his notebooks.

Townsend Brown was still in France for his
fifty-first birthday — March 18, 1956 —
when he was photographed outside a Paris
Bistro with four unidentified sailors and a
smartly dressed civilian about a half-a-head
shorter than Brown. That’s O’Riley, who
was again assigned to accompany Dr. Brown
during his travels as an escort and liaison.

The Liberte’ arrived at her berth in New York on March April 4, 1956. The next day,
Robert Sarbacher’s black Cadillac showed up at Montressor.
“As soon as he came back from that last trip to Europe,” Linda recalls, “he stopped by
Montressor for just a few hours. Sarbacher was with him. He brought Helen and me each
a scarf, and mother a purse. We visited for just a short time. And then he left.”
It was nearly a year before Linda saw her father again.

And here is what PeeTee said:

Of course you don't read or understand French so you haven't seen or understood what went on in France in 1955 to 1957.http://www.ttownsendbrown.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=30832#p30832

I have highlighted the part in question. As any individual can see, my information is from the book written by the biographer of T. Townsend Brown under contract with the Brown family. If there is any error than that error is with the person that supplied the information to Paul Schatzkin. Perhaps Morgan should step forward and straighten this mess out....fat chance of that. Apologies.....Linda should step forward.

PeeTee clearly states that the experiments took place "in France in 1955 to 1957" which is contrary to what has been written. If that information is in incorrect than we will wait to see the translations finished to amend the biography. Otherwise, no apology is or will be forthcoming for NO infraction has been committed. My information is based upon "printed and published" information based upon information from the Brown family archive.

And speaking of apologies, where is yours for what you have done Linda? You need to apologize to my parents for what you put them through by your little girl actions. You are no "pollyanna", you are more like Violet, the girl who turned purple in the film "Willy Wonka". Or how about an apology for pretending to be George and threatening my family? ...which YOU already did with putting out personal information.

You are an arrogant, self-centered, egotistical narcissist.....and you make me laugh and you brighten my day with what you come up with...

Mikado

[Mikado14]

OH.....one more item.

I just "love" the nickname you came up....."The Shack".

Has a nice ring to it.

Mikado

[Mikado14]

And a very special tribute to GMan:

Re: Regarding the HUT
by G-Man » Thu Dec 08, 2011 3:44 am
As the Reverend Spooner might have said (to which Kevin has alluded) "The Shack of Site"

As I have mentioned in the past, it takes one, to know one.....a "sack of sh1t" that is.

Ignorance is rampant at the Nickel.