Your demonstrating all that I have said in that you are the spoiled little girl who is standing in the middle of the room and will continue to belabor a point and twist and turn until someone just gets exasperated with your tantrum and says "uncle".
First, this:
Linda wrote:Yet Mikado... you tell a story about someone talking to my sister in law with the report that I was " spoiled" in her consideration. And when asked to back that up you said it was second ( or was that third hand information?).... you of course didn't name your source.
How do you know that information was accurate?
Because I heard it on tape along with a good many other things that I will not mention ever because they are not germane to the topic and that is the due-diligence of the book "Defying Gravity". I could care less what was said about your brother and your father and their relationship as well as how your brother felt in regard to your Mother.
I do understand why you didn't want anyone to talk to them. Smartest thing you have done.
Linda wrote:As I see it the things that you have been saying here...could just as easily been a figment of your imagination or your sources..... ( since your source was never identified ).... so the same things that you are berating me about..... you also are doing.... please tell me the difference?
There is ONE difference in all of this though..... the so called " stories" that you say I have spun.... (going on information I have been told by Morgan and Mr. Twigsnapper) have not been in any way nasty comments on a persons character. Yet your renditions seem to have that flavor and are consistantly that tone. I am not asking for a response here because I tire of the same old rhetoric... I am just making a pointed comment so that others will see what has been happening too.
Figment of my imagination? Sure, why not but is that the best you can do? I can prove in a court of law under oath all that I have said. You can't, that is the difference.
As to my source being identified, not yet. But look at it from the following viewpoint:
Paul wrote a book. Did any of his sources get identified? No, and those sources were highly instrumental in the information supplied. Do you care? No, so why do you criticize me for not releasing my sources? There is that ole double standard you employ...and I hope others see that as well. Anyone who will take "Defying Gravity" as a serious biography is gullable. A biography is expected to be based upon fact from reliable sources and two anonymous characters are not reliable or credible.
And that is the REAL reason Paul quit. The characters were empty shells. I had nothing to do with it. You did or would that be Morgan and twigsnapper....lol
As to Morgan and twigsnapper telling you anything, well, after all this time - where are they? You threatened Fred when you told me that bogus lie that he was in the Hut and doing "things" as we spoke, you even called me at work and within 15 minutes you had him disabled. But when the record was checked, he wasn't even on line...and that included the stat counter which logs CANNOT be erased so I give that information to prevent you from making any false statements that will only prove out as false...and that is one freebie. Back to what I was saying, where are they? Did they go to his house? Did they ever come to my house? The only ones who ever came to my house where the curious and that was thanks to you. I should post your address and let us see who shows up at your doorstep.
So, speaking of figments of imagination...and now I know why the area was like looking through the mist.
Speaking of rhetoric, it isn't, it is consistency. It is you who keep coming up with new twists and turns like a poorly crafted Agatha Christie knock off story.
Mikado
