Linda Brown wrote:I am going to take your response one section at a time so that I can be fair to what you have said...
"First of all, let's get something straight, I have NEVER questioned a thing about Ann whoeversheis. I have NEVER met her and only know what I know from you talking about her. Judging upon what you have said about Morgan and twigsnapper and after meeting them, one can only wonder
So what do you mean " and after meeting them????? You have met both of them? That is news to me" I thought that you said that they were a figment of my imagination. I hate to tell you this Mikado but it is hard to get people to believe BOTH things. Right readers?
You are a piece of work. I am referring to meeting the individuals you claimed were those individuals and that they BOTH said that they are not who claimed they are.
Are you that thick? I keep saying the same thing over and over again and you keep attempting to twist it into something other than what I have said. It won't little girl, it may have worked for your Mommy and Daddy but not me.
Linda Brown wrote:I don't know about " questioning a thing about Anne" What did this statement from you mean then when you very blatently said this." I suppose that Ann has a fifth appendage...if she even exists? Or is that a man's name?How are we all supposed to translate that little comment? I took " if she even exists" as a direct challenge. How can you say that it isn't? Readers?
Okay, since Morgan/twigsnapper don't exist, as to who you identified as such, then why should Ann? So far you are two out of three and the odds say she isn't quite exactly as your describe. Secondly, as to the appendage, you said at one time that Ann was a remnant from SRI and your further stated that they were all men, ergo, the fifth appendage. I suppose you will claim that Ann was never at SRI so which is it? Was she or wasn't she? I grow weary of your changing history.
Linda Brown wrote:And don't put me in the same church as all those that offer opinion about me without ever having met me ( why do they have to meet you in person Mikado? You don't WANT anyone to meet you or even know what you look like so don't complain about them forming conclusions about what they read and what you choose to write here.) and passing judgement all predicated upon the words from someone of your caliper.( I think maybe thats the wrong word but I will let you do your own good proof reading)
No, caliper is correct. Sometimes spelled "calipre". I am not complaining, I am pointing out how opinionated they are based upon what only you say. Even after seeing the information put forth in the due-diligence, they refuse to check out the references and links and make an informed decision. There prerogative to do so.
Linda Brown wrote:After what has been revealed in regard to the due-diligence, those with a modicum of intelligence can see that questions, at the very least, need to be answered. And yes, I received an email this morning...batshit? And you throw aspersions my way when I say things directly to you. Cowards are what populates your ship. And they are entitled to say what they say..... you are free enough with casting your insults about arn't you? It doesn't mean anything in the long run. Actions speak louder than words, the old saying goes.
And again I say this, their aspersions are based on the rantings of a spoiled little girl when the facts have been presented in the due-diligence. It reminds so of the little girl who puts her hands over her ears, closes her eyes and screams no...oops, I think I might have described you and those on the Token.
Linda Brown wrote:"You tested off the charts because you were more imagination than fact.( Thats funny Mikado. YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT AN EARLY REMOTE VIEWING PROGRAM REMEMBER.
So what are you saying? There were no charts for you to test off of? What you are implying is that the program was new so therefore there were no charts for they were being developed. If they were not developed...see my point?
Linda Brown wrote:Your Father had an office there, he had no direct involvement with anyone actively participating in the program. ( He did not have an office there because his ties were so strong with everyone working there he didn't need one. His instruments were there and he spent alot of time overseeing what was going on. Get your facts straight Mikado before you present yourself as an expert in a situation that predates you! How old were you then? And yet you like to talk as if you were there!) [/color
My facts are based upon what I was told, just as you claim in your stories about Morgan/twigsnapper. The difference, Ernestine was real.
Linda Brown wrote:However, what she did say would have been good copy for Paul's book. I never told Paul because I thought you might be embarrassed by what she said and I felt the need to wait and see, protect you in a manner of speaking until more facts were revealed. [color=#0000FF]I don't believe that. If I knew what I know now, I would certainly reverse that decision. Anything I would say now as to what Ernestine revealed would amount to nothing more than heresay. She passed away a few years ago Isn't that convenient for you Mikado. But perhaps there are others????[color=#0000FF]And thats the only reason that you feel free to say what you have. Because there is no one to check your story. Pixie dust Mikado.
I repeat, you are claiming pixie dust when you have a bin full. Morgan/twigsnapper. Your argument falls apart.
Linda Brown wrote:I never told Paul because I thought you might be embarrassed by what she said and I felt the need to wait and see, protect you in a manner of speaking until more facts were revealed. Protect me? Now there is the first laugh of the day! Linda.[/color]
At the time, I would have done anything for you. I think you are the witch, ever hear of a glamour spell?
Mikado