Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

[kevin]

Is this thread really apropos to the title?

How is it in keeping with the hypocritical actions of a certain site and the owner thereof?

Since you are judging and as someone once said..."judge not lest ye be judged"...under what or whose authority are you empowered to judge others?

Wouldn't this topic of judging this site be more appropriate in a thread where science is discussed since you are judging on that subject?

And lastly, if you feel no science is being discussed here, I would direct you to quite a few threads that Luis has posted. They may not be the science you want to discuss but are that none the less. Whether it be hard academia science, pseudoscience/esoteric, science in the news or whatever, it is here. On my brief stay at the Token, I didn't see too much talk about THE science of Brown but then it is just pseudoscience as well, some of it is hard science but a good deal is unproven. What I did see at the Token was a good deal of discrediting going on and not too much objectivity. As soon as I was posting objective opinions on Hutchison, Linda then decided to expel me. See my point? If it doesn't fit into some agenda that fits her plans, off with their heads. So how can any real discussions occur that are objective?

And one last thing, I too had a run in with wdavidb. I found him attempting to describe an idea, a principle by using terms already in use by established science that made those contradictory. You should have seen his antigravity machine that utilized 2x4's. It made one think that his ideas were the impetus for the cartoon the "Kids next door" that utilized 2x4 technology to go to the moon. Trickfox attempted to analyze his ideas and his machine and wdavidb just couldn't elaborate. That being said, if he couldn't elaborate on his design than was his design only whimsy?

I want to know how this thread belongs here, if you please.

Mikado

Should have replied to this earlier, but have been busy pulling knives out of My back.

David has made the same mistakes as I have in trying to convey His thoughts in current accepted terms etc.
He has then encountered the self same ridicule and disdain , especially from those better versed in current accepted terms and so called laws.
First off I should apologize for been caught in such a trap, and instead I should present only as I detect and deduce, and state quite clearly that this is not conforming to the accepted.
I do not fully comprehend what I detect, and that is My agenda and has been all along to better comprehend something that is by current accept laws of science just too wacky to entertain.
Therefore if anyone is looking for a so called scientific set of answers then David and Myself should not be in Your thoughts.
I would though say that I view those who then use ridicule and their ASSumed knowledge of current terms and laws of science to belittle those trying to convey something that is very very difficult to verbalise as plonkers, and have a visual mental image of them swallowing huge bottles of ego tablets.
Kevin

[Fruitbat]

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 6:24 pm
Last visited: Tue May 20, 2014 12:33 pm
Total posts: 1578
[5.60% of all posts / 0.86 posts per day]
Search user’s posts
Most active forum: Notes from the Hut
[ 1297 Posts / 82.19% of user’s posts ]
Most active topic: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!
[ 37 Posts / 2.34% of user’s posts ]

Someone really LIKES this topic! (((( ))))

FB.

[kevin]

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 6:24 pm
Last visited: Tue May 20, 2014 12:33 pm
Total posts: 1578
[5.60% of all posts / 0.86 posts per day]
Search user’s posts
Most active forum: Notes from the Hut
[ 1297 Posts / 82.19% of user’s posts ]
Most active topic: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!
[ 37 Posts / 2.34% of user’s posts ]

Someone really LIKES this topic! (((( ))))

FB.

"Someone" has a name.
You continue to be ??????????
Kevin

[kevin]

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 6:24 pm
Last visited: Tue May 20, 2014 12:33 pm
Total posts: 1578
[5.60% of all posts / 0.86 posts per day]
Search user’s posts
Most active forum: Notes from the Hut
[ 1297 Posts / 82.19% of user’s posts ]
Most active topic: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!
[ 37 Posts / 2.34% of user’s posts ]

Someone really LIKES this topic! (((( ))))

FB.

I take it as the self appointed, self annoited JUDGE, that You now have appointed Yourself as head detective also???
What is the slang word for detectives?????
By putting the word "someone"
You are implying that the poster is what???
Kevin

[TheTraveler]

Greetings!

All this talk of Blue... you all must realize what many of us suspect is the truth, and that is that Linda=Blue=Miles (er Myles)=many others.

Of Course, we are all wrong at one time or another...

[kevin]

Greetings!

All this talk of Blue... you all must realize what many of us suspect is the truth, and that is that Linda=Blue=Miles (er Myles)=many others.

Of Course, we are all wrong at one time or another...

Coats of many colours.
Kevin

[Mikado14]

Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 6:24 pm
Last visited: Tue May 20, 2014 12:33 pm
Total posts: 1578
[5.60% of all posts / 0.86 posts per day]
Search user’s posts
Most active forum: Notes from the Hut
[ 1297 Posts / 82.19% of user’s posts ]
Most active topic: Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!
[ 37 Posts / 2.34% of user’s posts ]

Someone really LIKES this topic! (((( ))))

FB.

What you posted are kevin's stats.

If you look at the numbers you will see the most active forum is "Notes from the Hut" that contain 82.19 % of all his posts. The topic "Steve Clarke..." has 37 posts out of the 1578 posts made. I fail to see the significance.

If you can't see the reason that kevin is posting in this thread, then perhaps you aren't as bright as I once thought you were. But then if this is an attempt at British humour, I am corrected and please disregard the previous statements and the two of you can slug it out.

Mikado

[kevin]

Mikado,
I am not amused or laughing.
Those are My stats, and I of course knew that full well.
This is a furtherance of a continuous discredit against Myself that steve clarke has been on for some considerable time, whoever steve clarke is????

By putting "someone" He implies that there is an unknown showing considerable interest in this thread.
He has been saying this is all some form of British humour ...blah, blah .
He has tried unsuccessfully to find some common ground between Myself and him at LINDAS instructions.
I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH ANYONE , HE HAS A MASSIVE PROBLEM WITH ME.

You can see clearly why I would be drawn like a moth to a light to this thread.
I have no intention at all in "slugging it out"
His agenda is to clear Me off this site....2 down, 1 to go.
Fuck knows why, perhaps He or his handler Linda can provide some evidence???, warts and all.
There is none, zilch, I am a nobody.

Kevin

[Mikado14]

Over the years little boy blue would recieve that same message from Me, He has had multiple personas.....multiple.

Kevin

Well, far as I've understood this (ahem) Mess - not that I'm particularly interested in doing so, but you'll have to agree it is kinda hard not to when it permeates everything around - "little boy blue" nowadays goes by the apt (ahem) name of "Bogie".

Watch (ahem) "your six", everyone.


Coughing a lot, here, (ahem) dammit !

Really? Blue is Bogie? So does that mean Blue has had the ability to post on the Token but instead prefers to send emails/PM's to Linda so that she may post them? Wouldn't that afford the opportunity for some creative editing to be done? Hell, she more than likely creates the entire Blue post herself and why not for she has gotten away with it for so long and she is just using him as a dildo.

Also, if this is the route that the Blue posts are taking, wouldn't it be the very same situation that Linda is attempting to avoid? You all know what I mean...the clique thing. It would mean that she is working behind the scene for a good while with Bogie/Dave in using his persona to post whatever she wants OR he has been sending her these posts to put out when the reality of it all is that he could have done it himself under the name of Bogie.

kevin is correct. Too much crap going on in the background with the mentality of "do as I say and not as I do" taking place. I believe it could be referred to as deception.

Yeah, this is in the correct spot....hypocritical actions of Linda Brown.

Mikado

[wags]

I have felt uneasy about 'Posting on behalf of' except in certain cases for example when a poster is temporary unable to post due to technical or geographical reasons.

I feel if you have something to say, be an adult and stand or fall by what you say. By using the most powerful poster to make very controversial and potentially damaging, and injurious comments that cannot be easily countered by general members is not advisable.

It also causes rightly or wrongly controversy over the true identity of members and sows doubt and distrust creating an atmosphere were conflict can flourish unchecked.

Mind I think talking about it inflames the issue further, but I guess I feel that it needs saying here. I think that it best to regard such posts as of a lower quality, discounted and not responded to at all. It is I believe the best way to make the practice taboo.

I am of course talking about first5 princi8ples rather than the specific case.

More ramblings I guess...