Soloma wrote:Welcome CP, glad to see you finally made it here. I would like to request you and Nancy consider keeping your correspondence here for all to see and learn. I know in the past you have said your soeks does read a/b/g and I recall Nancy not being sure. Which is it and is there supporting evidence or link if it does? I was not able to find that info previously when I checked.
I went through protocols on Linda's forum. Lots of work doing that.
I went through some info I had posted on her site and copied and pasted below what was discussed "using just the tones":
The one thing I can suggest, is for MC4U to get some scientific radioactive samples.
Or some uraninite ore.
As the uraninite has such a HUGE half-life (billions of years) any reduction in the radiation reading from the uraninite would be solid proof.
A form would need to be created to position the uraninite and the Geiger counter. Important, as even the slightest various in the distance between the sample and the counter can create false data.
(as you move the Geiger counter away from a radioactive sample, the radiation detected on the Geiger counter gets lower)
The Geiger counters we use cost about $500 each (other than the military models, which I don't think are even available for general public purchase).
For a controlled test of the tones and the uraninite, IMO, other less expensive Geiger counters could be utilized.
My only concern is that Geiger counter used by MC4U would read alpha. beta and gamma.
In the countless readings I have taken here at the lab (on radioactive samples), I do a "full count", then I put filters between the counter and the sample so that I can determine each type (alpha, beta or gamma)
During the transmutation process (which occurs when the uraninite is placed between two speakers with the tones running)...there are wild shifts in the percentages of alpha,beta and gamma.
I have noticed that the total count would go done only a small amount, but then with the filters, determined the uraninite was emitting a huge percentage of alpha, and much lower beta.
Very unusual for uraninite.
Unless MC4U can determine when these shifts are occurring, he may decide "it isn't working", when in fact, the uraninite is in the process of transmutating.
Alpha is far less dangerous than beta, and gamma is the bad boy.
So, uraninite that has been exposed to the tones and has a basically same total count, isn't telling you the total picture.
If the uraninite total count is the same after 10 days, 30 days..etc--and the MIX had changed (huge alpha and low beta), then that is VERY important.
That is my suggestion. A controlled test with a radioactive sample, placed in a form so that distance between the sample and Geiger counter are always identical.
Beginning readings taken. Minimum ten-minute counts (then divide by 10 to get counts per minute)]
Sample between two speakers that face each other. Let it run...days...before taking the first reading "after tones".
Paper can be used as a filer between the Geiger counter and the sample.
If the Geiger counter is reading alpha, beta and gamma, the results would be something like this:
Initial reading (before tones)
Date and time
Ten minute total count: 50,000
Ten minute count w/paper: 48,000
tones started _ date and time, under ______conditions
First reading after tones:
Date and time
Ten Minute total count: 49,000
Ten minute count w/paper: 24,000
sample returned to tones on _date and time__
If the data comes back something like above, then that is REALLY important.
it would indicate the ability of the tones to change the TYPE of radiation emitted by the uraninite, indicative of a transmutation in process.
---and---
I discussed protocols at length on Linda's forum here:
http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... f=5&t=1405Nancy
