Setting the record straight

[Mikado14]

Correcting and clarifying the record.

http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... 397#p34397

<snip>
I know that we are getting alot of visitors from the Netherlands... Pay attention here to what Mikado is saying. Can you see the lies being thrown out there? I rather imagine that you can. Have you all been banned from visiting the HUT yet? Mikado is spending a great deal of time doing that and its an odd passion. Why is he trying to block a visitors ability to read his words?

He SAYS its to keep ME from reading what is being said there. But all of you on the HUT and trying to read the material that has been posted there in the past.... all of you need to ask yourself... what is Mikado hiding here?
<snip>

The Netherlands you say? curious. And would they be from Kaia Global Networks?...a known proxy and identified as a Proxy?

Who is trying to hide from whom?

I block all proxies that show up. I explained it before as to why but let me reiterate, it is how a good deal of spammers enter. Since I started to blocking identified proxy servers I have no spam attacks. However, I have had "real people" join, from proxies, and then post ads with links. These were primarily out of California and I stated it at one time on here. If someone is blocked, well, there are many ways of coming in and getting the email from the front page and I can isolate the banned IP. Just look at how you have to go out of your way to a public wayport? You too stupid to see that I control your obsession to make you go out of your way to look in here. Doesn't have to be that way but your choice.....missy.

Your statements are as everything else you say ... Missy, embellishment of a fact and twisted in a manner that does not resemble what it originally was.

Do I block you? Absofreakinlutely. You need no fuel to feed your psychopathic personality. You still have the ability to post here. If you want to post and discuss reasonably, send me an email, I will unban you but I doubt that will happen. You are all about control Linda. By taking posts from here, albeit not complete, and do not give a link other than to say it is here, does not constitute fair and reasonable. You see, there is no search function unless a member logs in. Therefore, any post you copy is a violation when you do it as many times as you do. Let's just say that is evidence.

Now, if you truly wished to discuss statements I make, do so here for I cannot do so on the Token, again, control of the information posted.

Sad really but it is an indication, the control aspect, that what I say with all the links and sources I put up that conflict with statements made by you and others such as twigsnapper and Morgan are actually and factually correct and that scares your pantyhose off for the truth is out there. This only increases the stories to come out more with the inferences that you have "hidden" technology from your Father.

You know what I say? If you have any and you release it and I am still alive, I will post a full page ad in the New York Times and the Washington Post and the LA Times stating that I was wrong about you.

....like that will ever happen but I post this here for perpetuity of my days left.

Mikado

[kevin]

It is a rare event where a post by fruitcake sets Me off laughing, but His demand about who Mikado is, actually did.
Who the F@@@ is He?????
http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... &start=100
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdLIerfXuZ4
Kevin

[Mikado14]

It is a rare event where a post by fruitcake sets Me off laughing, but His demand about who Mikado is, actually did.
Who the F@@@ is He?????
http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... &start=100
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdLIerfXuZ4
Kevin

Let's bring it over here and see what he has to say:

http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... 407#p34407

Re: Andrew Bollands Story
Postby fruitbat » Mon May 18, 2015 6:23 pm

Mikado.

Who and what exactly is he?

How does HE get to decide the truth or otherwise of your dads life.
Has he spent a great deal of time engaged in formal research?

How come he claims to know so much about the topic at hand, which by any measure is VERY specialist knowledge?
Where did he get that knowledge from?
Or if he is inventing/discovering it is as he goes along "Tesla like", where is the physical evidence of his creative power?

Does he actually have any skills, knowledge or qualifications, that raise his credibility above yours Linda?
Since he has been making a lot of noise, about yourself and your dads credibilty, it seems only fair that we know something about his own.
Does he actually have anything to back up his many claims, or is he just a really annoying blowhard?

Fruitbat.

(Disclaimer: I think I may already be able to guess the answers to my questions based upon 3-4 years of being here, but I'm not actually SURE, so I'm asking Linda because she HAS known him before he was openly and consistently adversarial, and therefore may be able to shed some light upon what is fairly hard to understand behaviour)

I can sum up who I am rather easily.....I am nobody. What am I? Last time I checked, a human being.

Of course one may wonder as to who the person is that can ask that question but I am not that person since I am a nobody.

I have not passed any judgement in regard to Brown. I have posted opinion pieces but then, I have noticed that a good many individuals have done just that based upon hearsay information but then, only a nobody would look for facts because somebody's have all the facts. I have posted information that I have researched in regard to the book, "Defying Gravity" by Paul Schatzkin. If you, fruitbat, interpret research with citations from other sources as deciding the truth in regard to Brown then that is your misinterpretation of the facts. I am nobody to be passing judgement but since I am a nobody that has done a great deal of research, in an effort to establish veracity to what was written in the book without the dependency upon hearsay information provided by fictitious characters who have since dropped off the face of the earth after Paul Schatzkin shut down the forum in January of 2009 which in itself is suspicious (long sentence, sorry). As to the previous post in the science section (Gravity), I drove over 180 miles to Penn State to read Meinesz Volume II but then, I suppose only a nobody would want to check facts and being a nobody, I am also stupid to spend my own money to search for truth. A somebody could have had it delivered to them but then they would have all the facts and need not do any research.

I have spent a great deal of time into researching facts and statements made in the book "Defying Gravity". If you are referring to "formal" research as in regard to science then you seriously need to define the word "formal". As a nobody, I need you to clarify the definitions of some words you use.

Now you have a paragraph in your question in regard to me about knowledge. You are calling it "VERY specialist knowledge". How would you know what type of knowledge is "VERY specialist"? I know I don't know what you mean because again, I am a nobody and you must be a somebody if you can identify what "VERY specialist knowledge" is. However, if you would have logged in and saw the thread about the Conference in October, you would have saw photos of two Gravitors that have been built by me. But then I am sure you didn't for any photo I post is only from a nobody and why bother looking at a photo from a nobody because as a somebody, I am sure you have all the photos already.

As to my skills in regard to Linda's skills. Obviously, I have none and any I do have are sub par in regard to what Linda possesses. As to making noise about Linda's credibility, remember, I am a nobody. Someone who Linda lied to, bold face lied in person to not only myself but others which would indicate that she thinks that I and those others are just nobody's for she is a somebody. It is an unwritten law that somebody's are allowed to lie and obfuscate to those that are nobody's.

As to being a blowhard, l suppose your right for I am a nobody and you are a somebody. Since you are a somebody, I have found that most somebody's are cowardly, arrogant, egotistical narcissists, liberal to a fault, progressive when using others money, predatory in nature and all directed to nobody's like myself.

As a nobody, I can easily say that you seriously need to go fuck yourself but then, being a nobody as I am you only need to take it with a grain of salt because nobodys are rude and crude and I wouldn't want to disappoint either you or Linda and I want to provide you both with something to be disgusted with on my end.

However, I must say why are you so worried about a nobody like me and other nobodys that are here on the Hut?

Unless of course we scare you. Oh yeah, add insecure to the list above.

Mikado

[Mikado14]

http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... 409#p34409

Re: Andrew Bollands Story
Postby Linda Brown » Tue May 19, 2015 1:09 am

Kevin...( from the Hut ..... ttownsendbrown.com......)

You " admire Mikado greatly" and you SAY " He is intent on every detail been accurate?"

REALLY?

According to Mikado Dr. Mienesz was NEVER on the S48!!!!!! How then does he explain this.... which was published in Paul Shatzkins excellent chapter about that cruise!

Jess will post this picture when he has the opportunity and I thank him very much.

And about MIKADO? You continue to believe someone who continues to mislead you so?
Kevin... why are you so intent on protecting Mikado and supporting him? Why do you believe all of his words are true? You even give him room to be wrong.... but can't you see that it is all intentional? Does this feel RIGHT to you?

According to Mikado I am just a psychopathic delusional little girl named Missy with her pantyhose in a bunch. According to him I am a liar, surrounded by liars....my husband is a " gutless Marine" and the man he calls "Dave" is a coward. Do you actually believe all of that?

None of this is true and you know this in your heart.

I was a much better friend to you than Mikado has ever been.

Linda Brown Pickering Rosegate Consortium May 2015

Linda, I need to set the record straight. I realize that you don't have all that much time to cut and paste on your Ipad at the McDonald's public wayport (18 May 2015 07:51:15 PM for a bit over 15 minutes) but you need to learn a bit more about comprehension and develop those skills.

viewtopic.php?p=36897#p36897

There is a photo of Brown on the S-48 in Chapter 26 with Meinsz but this, more than likely, was Meinsz overseeing the installation of the pendulum apparatus.

You seem to have read kevin's post but did you read this post on the previous page?

Why is it that you continue to prove my point in that you make statements, factual in presentation but there is proof that you are wrong? Why? You make it too easy to discount you. As to Paul's "excellent" chapter, he would have benefited from reading Volume II of Meinesz' book. Brown is not even mentioned but referred to as a "Navy technician". He really impressed him from that account.


As to this:

"According to Mikado I am just a psychopathic delusional little girl named Missy with her pantyhose in a bunch. According to him I am a liar, surrounded by liars....my husband is a " gutless Marine" and the man he calls "Dave" is a coward. Do you actually believe all of that?"

Yes, you are psychopathic, especially when you go to McDonalds to read the Hut. Yes, you are a delusional little girl by your actions and will be treated accordingly and if your pantyhose isn't in a bunch, you sure act like it (I see you got all that when you were on tonight but you didn't even see the part about the photo)

As to a gutless Marine, when he sends an email that threatened my family and signed it "G" then yes, he a gutless individual but then we really know the truth as to who/whom sent that but since you haven't told the truth then it will be the gutless marine named George. What does that say about you to allow someone to call him that when you know you wrote the email? It tells me that you are the psychopath that I said you are.

Mikado

PS: And yes, Dave is a coward, he walked right by me and I turned to watch him walk away. For all he said about me he hasn't any guts either. But then, based upon your past performances, I would bet you were Blue and you are bogie. It just fits but you would allow me to call him a coward to protect yourself. A true psychopathic trait in play.

[kevin]

Mikado admits He is "nobody"
Excellent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpi0qsp3v_w

I am not "protecting or supporting" Mikado, Thats His own personal responsibility.
I am not protecting or supporting Linda, Thats Her personal responsibility.

The pair of You have been at this for years.

Kevin

[kevin]

Captain Nemo Mikado, of the S 48 Nautilus.
http://www.ee.columbia.edu/~nemo/nemo.html
Fruitbat is perhaps nowhere man?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PASYqq4-iD0
kevin

[kevin]

I should have added that Nemo in latin is nobody.
I do hope Mikado is able to cope without Myself protecting Him??????

Anyone any idea as to what on Earth Linda is waffling about with this protection business???

Kevin

[kevin]

Of course....the newest member...
Siciliansalvo.....they are supposed to be tops in the protection racket.
Mikado is saved.
Kevin

[Mikado14]

And this which parts were copied from the Hut around 7:40 from a proxy server out of Czech Republic. I wonder if this is why Linda recently discussed the Netherlands since a good many proxies were coming out of there that I blocked. Probably fruitbat copying for Linda :

http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... 417#p34417

Re: Andrew Bollands Story
Postby Linda Brown » Tue May 19, 2015 2:42 pm

Lets see what you and all of us have been told Kevin....

First this

"Mikado14 » Sun May 17, 2015 12:49 pm
Yes kevin, and he was on quite a few submarines, mostly dutch submarines I believe.

He NEVER was on an American sub which was verified by his publications. twigsnapper lied....again. I could write a book on all of the inaccuracies given to Paul Schatzkin but I will sit on it, for now.....come and get me Linda with your lawsuit....I am waiting to correct history as you have told it.

Mikado**********************************************

and then this?


No one, least of all myself, ever implied that Meinsz was not involved, my point was to clarify one.

Drawn right from a recent post on the HUT ttownsendbrown.com

************************************************
You are loose with your words Mikado. How can anyone ever trust what you say about anything?
And considering the filth that you spout. Who wants to even read what you have to say?

*************************************************
As Kevin has just written.... as far as he is concerned. You are on your own.
And so am I. Thats probably the best rational conclusion that kevin has reached for himself. Good for you kevin......

"by kevin » Tue May 19, 2015 3:33 am
Mikado admits He is "nobody"
Excellent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpi0qsp3v_w

I am not "protecting or supporting" Mikado, Thats His own personal responsibility.
I am not protecting or supporting Linda, Thats Her personal responsibility.

The pair of You have been at this for years.

Kevin

You used the right words there kevin. I am definitely no longer protecting NOR supporting Mikado. That is his own personal responsibility from now on.

Linda Brown Pickering Rosegate Consortium May 2015
From the Shadow of Giant Rock

I am not loose with my words. You are loose with your comprehension and you always have been, just ask Paul Schatzkin.

As for you protecting me or supporting me?.....I never needed nor asked for any "protection" from you for you could offer no more protection to anyone than sheet of paper could protect one from hail. You are nothing and a nobody when it comes to the inferred "spy" connections. But you will persist in putting them out there and inferring that you have all kinds of secret knowledge and just plain old secrets about people, places and things. As to supporting me, when have you done that in the past 5 years? I would no longer want any support from a psychopath as you then to have the support of a mental patient....same difference.

Remember this, if you really did have any information, you would know to keep your mouth shut but in your case, you do it to make yourself look important and some people believe you, sad for them for they really don't know you but the reality is, I don't care what you do except when you drag my name into it, then I will post rebuttals.....

Get a life Linda and stop looking for conspiracies and accept responsibility for your stories. Your lied, you got caught in a big way. Concentrate on looking for information about your Father. There is a lot out there if you would use logic and not fantasy.

But be prepared, some of it you may not like.

Why don't you on one of you conjugal visits to Dave take a trip by the main campus of Penn State. Not only could you see Meinesz's Volume II but there are a few more things there that might just give you some info. They have a wealth of information in regard to the U of P. And they really don't charge too much for copies. But then, you would say it was planted there to make you Dad look in an ill manner.

Mikado

Remember....she not be told....the biggest admission by your parents that you were a story teller and one who couldn't be trusted.

[Mikado14]

Too early for a full moon so it might be med related.

How is it that Linda uses casual comments made by others to create posts on her forum? How is it that anything mentioned here, i.e. S-48, is used to create a new thread that only rehashes twisted references with unsubstantiated photo ID's, i.e. Not much of a free thinker at times but definitely a free fantasizer.

Linda took a post of mine, well, fruitbat more than likely copied it or she did it at a public wayport, and went on her usual rampage attempting to make factual statements based upon only reading part of my post that favoured her lunacy (selective comprehension).

1. The due-diligence, when started, was always stated as an independent endeavour. It was never endorsed by Paul Schatzkin. That fact was repeatedly stated, you just don't read properly. If in fact Paul is concerned, frankly, I can't see why he would be against what I have done since it only supports the fact that all Morgan/twigsnapper/anonymous spy types had told him was a mere....no...a gross bag of empty shells but he knows how to get ahold of me if he so chooses.

2. It is none of your business and certainly needs no endorsement from you as to "anyone" performing a due-diligence on a published book as long as full credit is given under copyright and citations/sources are given. You, Linda Brown/Leach/Leech, are not the copyright holder and your persistent vitriol is an indicator of the veracity of the due-diligence whereas as stated, citations/sources are given and you offer nothing but only have your word to stand on but be careful, that box your standing on will crumble. Therefore, since you cannot offer citations/sources other than anonymous statements given via anonymous emails and reformed alcoholics/drug users, your objections are moot. (If the term due-diligence is not to your liking then you can refer to it as a book review of the facts vs information available)

3. Facts stated in the due-diligence always had a reference or citation at minimum. If there were confusing statements made, both statements were presented along with the citation. In most cases, discrepancies were the result of information supplied by either Morgan/twigsnapper versus a verifiable source.

4. Performing a Due-Diligence on a published book is not a violation of copyright law provided proper citation is given.

5. The post that you copied, viewtopic.php?p=36901#p36901 , was directed to fruitbat as evidenced by the quote from him along with the link (the link is something that the casual reader can go to see the source...something you haven't a clue to do. Your way of only stating the site is an attempt to create a way of obfuscating the source knowing full well that 99% of people will not attempt to read an entire site). Your asking who the closing comment was directed to only substantiates what I have been saying. You are a poor reader with poor comprehension skills and the "world" is to believe that you are accurate in what you read and your interpretation of events and facts all the while you stated to Paul/ttbrown/forum that growing up, no one told you a thing for they said "she need not know". If that be the case, then how is it that you know so much from when growing up when no one told you anything? Diametrically opposed statements to say the least. WHY DO YOU THINK PAUL RAN AWAY FROM YOU?

One item Paul mentioned in Huntingdon was that there was "no one" who could verify anything said by Morgan/twigsnapper which is a prime requirement for a Biography. Is that why you switched to writing a so called fiction? No one can ever question the veracity and you can forever hide behind it all the while claiming that you are hiding the truth in a work of fiction?

Never heard of the Penn State library? Where have your spy friends been? Here is a book you should read: Nelson, Stewart B; United States. Navy Dept. Office of the Oceanographer of the Navy. You'll find that in the library as well.

You really need to get a life but then in most greek tragedies, there needs to be a force to rally against but you have a trunk full.

Mikado

PS: No missy, not overwhelmed at all and Dave is a coward like the time at WaWa several years ago when he still had his old van and let us not forget when he was broke down on the road and I stopped to offer assistance and he was afraid to open the window.......