Again and again and here we go again. Kim was over at the Token and mentioned that the CEO of Brown Industries was at it again. So, sitting here and working on the computer, I decided to see for myself and made a decision to answer this for it is truly a work of fiction.
http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... 467#p34467From the desk of the CEO wrote:Re: Andrew Bollands Story
Postby Linda Brown » Sat May 23, 2015 4:28 pm
So let me get this straight....
From Mikado on the ttownsendbrown.com site commonly called the HUT
These recent comments.
IF a friend of mine is giving you information from a conversation then they are not my friend and you use the term loosely. There is only one person that comes to mind that I know talks with you and I never said that Andy and I were working together. We may talk and bounce ideas but neither one of us are connected to each other's projects.
So NEITHER OF YOU ARE CONNECTED TO EACH OTHERS PROJECT. FACT AS YOU STATED IT MIKADO.... IS NOTED.
Why the capital letters? Emphasis? Okay, but I do get that vision of a little girl stomping her foot to make a point. Your source is as bad as you. You, or they, are defining the meaning of "work" differently than what the reality is. You both, whom ever they are, need to think a bit more outside of the box. (and now she will twist this into a conspiracy that Andy and I have been working all along, since she first met him in the 80's, to discredit her and her Father......yawn.....)
From the desk of the CEO wrote:I will double check with that source of mine.... Hey Rose... next week lunch maybe, high noon? This last week just slid by but I was out of town for most of it.... sorry....I know that Mikado does keep in contact with you so if I misunderstood what he shared with you ( knowing of course that it would be repeated to me) then I need to correct my statement here. It was my impression that Mikado was looking forward to working with Andrew. Was I mistaken? Happy to correct that here if you want.
And now you are dragging Rose into your world. I don't believe you. I don't believe that Rose would carry water on both shoulders and I certainly have not talked with her with the intent of something getting back to you. If she has told you our conversations than knowing how you are, you would have been unloading all of it and twisting it to your liking. My contact with Rose is limited to, at best, perhaps one or two phone calls a year. Recently, I believe I may have had two phone calls with her since the turn of the year and in fact, I was going to call her this week to ask some advice on something. If Rose is carrying water, that is her kharma, not mine, for she is feeding your fantasy behaviour if not obsession with me and those around me. I believe that Rose is truly interested in what we are doing here and she was told that I would keep her informed. I will wait to hear from her if she so chooses to clarify your statement about her accused actions.
From the desk of the CEO wrote:Mikado is definitely good at calling people to leave his impression with them about me. He even bothered to call Dr. Kovalenko in Los Alamos. I happened to be sitting with Eugene when the call came in. His only response later was ..."Who is this man?"
Which of course is still my ongoing question. Who is it that spends YEARS involving himself in the legacy of Townsend Brown. WHY?
I know no one by that name. I never called anyone by that name. It is a flat out lie. The only person I ever called was John Griffin and that was in regard to his book for his website displays merchandise for sale. He started to talk about Linda and I may have briefly said a few things but nothing negative and stated that was not the reason I had called and that was the extent of that conversation. Don't believe me? Ask him but then you probably already know this but you won't use it because he will correct you, if anything, he is an honest man.
If I have talked with any in regard to you, it is those connected with this sordid relationship that we all had with you and your stories. You made it so easy to discount you for it became difficult to render truth from fiction, therefore, it is easier to discount all of what you say and only offer corrections and citations to show your...obfuscations.
From the desk of the CEO wrote:My lawyer says that Mikado is a " jilted lover" and should be treated like one. And then we both laugh because of the ridiculousness of that statement!
I am weary of hearing this which I believe is not true. Firstly, you can't afford a lawyer for extensive work. Secondly, you are not my type in the least. I prefer woman with good hygiene and I know, I helped clean out the Winnebago I rented for you.
Looking at appearances, you are appearing as the jilted lover. You keep posting, I keep rebutting. You don't post, I don't post. Now who appears to be the jilted lover?
From the desk of the CEO wrote:Mikado continues .....
The due-diligence, when started, was always stated as an independent endeavour. It was never endorsed by Paul Schatzkin. That fact was repeatedly stated, you just don't read properly.
Oh I read just fine Mikado. the words jump out at me......The due-diligence, when started, was always stated as an independent endeavour. It was never endorsed by Paul Schatzkin
So Paul didn't ask Mikado to help him improve the quality of his work... He didn't ask MIKADO to do anything. He just decided that this needed to be done. WHY?
If anyone is interested, here is the link to where the due-diligence began
viewtopic.php?p=31306#p31306Repeatedly over time, it has been stated that it was to find out the truth. Why is the concept of looking for the truth so alien to you, Linda? If you truly wanted to know about your Father, you should welcome it. However, your actions are of those that are defending their own words, their own actions. You defend Morgan, you defend twigsnapper, you defend anonymous sources on the old ttbrown forum. Your actions are defensive and not one of truly looking for answers. Therefore, you are defending your own words and are not interested in the truth, you defend your lies.
The truth needed and needs to be put forth. To understand the man is to understand his work. That was why it was started, it has been stated before and is stated again. However, the more I find out, the more I see he was a man with his foibles that you don't want to see.
From the desk of the CEO wrote:What was Mikados agenda in this? All he has done so far is to call me a variety of names... which slander my character...... liar.... adulterer... just a couple on the top of the list. He has called my husband a gutless marine..... Blue/Morgan/...... a coward..... and a few other choice negative comments......
WHY? What is Mikados MOTIVE here. If someone can find a result of all of these actions that is NOT negative and detrimental to me and my family.... I would like to hear them..... because apparently.... according to Mikado.... my reading and comprehension is below standard.
Those names are based upon your actions.
1. Liar - all one needs to do is to have been involved with you and see the proof that is counter to what you say. You defend yourself with one of three things, a) you tell another story and say that the person misunderstood; b) you invoke the phantoms of Morgan/twigsnapper into the mix; c) you go on a disinformation campaign. You never fess up and tell the truth when caught, easier to tell a bigger and better lie.
2. Adulterer - You are. You spent the week here in a Winnebago with Dave, there are witnesses. You and Dave had a room in Vegas in August of '10. You spent four days in West Virginia in a Motel room with Dave. You and Dave shared a small cabin at Travelers place in July of '11. And there are plenty more who probably have been around you and Dave since then. Like when you were here in Phoenixville and you and he sold yourself to the realtor as me and even used my email address....oops, that should have been in the liar section.
3. Gutless Marine - When the threatening email was sent, it was signed "G" and came from your Yahoo account. It was either you or George that sent it and you claimed it was him. Only a "gutless" person would threaten and not sign their name for they are gutless to owning the words they used. Now, we both know it was you that sent that and used his initial but if you are okay with me calling him gutless than that is on you. You must not care too much about George in that you allow someone to say such a thing due to something you did. Own up to your words.
4. Blue/Morgan a coward - absofreakinlutely! He rolled up his window in that van like a scared little school girl when I stopped to offer help. When he made eye contact with me recently he quickly looked to the right and put his left hand up to his face and put it down after he passed. And lastly, he can't face me with his own words, not even typing them on the forum last year. Instead, you protected him by asking me to leave for you knew that either a) he would have crumbled or; b) all would have found out it was you posing as someone else. Yes, he is a female cat.
Your reading and comprehension skills are more likely due to interpreting it in a manner that best suits what you want which in reality is not so much as an error as much as intentional.
From the desk of the CEO wrote:I just want answers and I will eventually get them.
Linda Brown Pickering Rosegate Consortium May 2015
You have been given answers, many times over. You repeat the same question and you will continue to do so until someone gives an answer you want. That answer will have no proof of veracity and will more than likely be a lie, but you will believe it for it suits your needs.
I pray for you.
Mikado
- IMG_1510.JPG (47.7 KiB) Viewed 2974 times
The shame of it all is that the CEO will not receive a copy of this photo without the person signing in.