Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

[kevin]

Mikado,
If You were as daft as Me and looked over into the bat cave, there are some viscious morons ranting and howling on in there, not wolves though, but certainly odd.
Fb is again painting Himself as a little innocent that "POOR HOBBIT" has been after for years, with "JUST ANOTHER MADMAN" in capitals added in for colouring.
Then Her that couldn't be allowed to know ( obvious why now) declares that I have had an agenda all along.
Too right, and it involves Her fathers works, not Her.
I simply came across EHD, who I thought was classy, idiot I am.

My AGENDA is really simple.
I desire to know fully what I detect.
And for some bizzare reason/s Dr Brown is central in that quest.
I have no ties to anyone, no interest in building any stupid toys.

Electricity is not made, this is an electric universe, electricity is not simply a commodity to abuse, what We ASSUME is electricity is a bastardization to put a meter in line to charge the slaves for,and to enable crude work.

The creative basis of all is enabled by the true nature of electricity, and it has a universal method, that what it enables can interact with, but not in the mechanical manner so many are stupid enough and blind enough to waste their time chasing.
So dickhead little innocent fruitcake can portray in His perverted painting of Me whatever He wants, and Linda is and has an agenda that is becoming increasingly obvious, She is not Dr Brown, or the chip of the block I was foolish enough to think.

Her attention seeking is all based upon Her father, and suckers are drawn towards such like moths into a light, shame it's such a dim bulb.
Kevin

[wags]

Kevin,

It is pointless, the revelation that Cat was asked to disrupt this forum is telling in itself.

FB talking about being unwelcome to post is not what I perceive to be accurate, only the intent and content appears to be under question. I have not seen any indication that Mikado has banned him. I am not advocating that course of action.
Though discreet moderation I would expect. But it is an academic point as FB has left the site and has no desire to post here, which is also fair enough.

I think letting her copy and paste and not putting anyone in the crosshairs as well as the time it takes to ban each IP. Though in Linda's case I would deny posting ability. It is more a pragmatic approach.

[kevin]

Wags,
I realise how pointless this is, but...
The but is that You haven't been the recipient of a creeping demolition of charecter that fruitcake has unrolled against Myself for several years.
because it was not aimed at others they couldn't sense what I did, and have had to endure.
He constantly refers to Himself as goody little two shoes who seeks harmony and friendship etc etc bile bile bile.

But in almost every reference relative to Me ( hobbit) is an undercurrent of hatred.
He did mention someone who He had a problem with years ago, I can't remember the name, and I asked several times for Him to talk about this , but no.

This latest shite posting that he hads dredged up are typical.

It is why I kept saying that it is He who has a problem relative to Myself.

As for Linda asking cat to do that shows a similer undercurrent of hatred directed at Mikado.

It is since He joined these forums that all of this has escalated, I am sorry but My opinion of Your friend is best left unprinted.
Kevin

[wags]

Kevin,

I have been on the end of destructive behaviour and it is part of what FB was referring to in 'Not kicking a man when he is down'.

I am aware of the incident that you refer to in relation to someone else. I cannot say much about that but he was indeed victim of a probable sociopath, but it was a case I could not have handled for a variety of reasons that are not important here.
(I use to provide representation but the Law was changed and no longer can afford to provide that service and cases cost a lot of time money and most importantly health).

Be your own unique self and sod the rest.

[StarCat]

As I said in the past, I was asked, in 2011, to spy on the Hut with the purpose of disrupting it. I did. It didn't last long because I found it distasteful. Recently I was unable to log in here, while I was in Yellowstone. I assume the IP was blocked, since it was unfamiliar. I was on a wifi signal from Gray Wolf Inn and Suites in West Yellowstone, Montana. I couldn't post for a few days. Not a big deal.

Cat

I couldn't log in on EUTM either, so it may have been a glitch of some sort. I had thought that maybe I hit the IP blocking jackpot or something. I know Xiao had to ban someone recently who could have been coming in from a similar IP. It's not like enforced time away was a bad thing. Unless you ask my grandkids. They went through Nintendo withdrawal.

Cat

[wags]

Linda causes the problem and then berates Mikado for taking precautionary measures. Total tosspot is that women.

[wags]

Another FB judgement:

In fairness to the bloke, if that had happened to me, I would have probably become an axe murderer.

Well yet he did not; that says something that contradicts his 'bad guy status' as when faced with adversity he did not turn into a 'axe murderer' [color=#0000BF]

I mean, did I read that right? He played the game, bought his land, gambled on being able to either overturn the covenant or use it some other way, sucessfully won his legal "play", built his house, got ready to settle and THEN it was deemed wrong, and the rest of the world decided his house had to go!! That's like a diabolical level of cruelty.

I personally hope he gets the facility and abilty to rebuild his "colonial farm house" and float it in perpetuity 10 inches off the surface of his land. Little else can I see, that would right that level of wrongness.

I'd be willing to make available to Mr Natate my evil side, if he wishes to have some ideas for executing a suitable revenge on the people who did this to him directly. As I've got older it's become much harder to justify being destructive or obstructive to other poeple or organisations but Jeez, if ever there was a situation that could be improved by handing out a little bit of whuppass, that looks like one!

[color=#0000BF]Seems FB is finding it difficult to justify being destructive or obstructive, but still willing to! Not your problem if there is one in the first place. After all Mikado did not initiate this line of inquiry, Linda raised it for no legitimate reason even if she did have a beef.

As it happens I share the experience of obtaining and then losing my own house, (although mine was a different scale and completely different circumstances) and I will admit, the experience did drive me into the arms of the medical profession at one point, (who gave me prozac which made my whole situation briefly immeasurably worse) so I can feel his pain. On the other hand hand just as I can tell my own story so that I am the "brave hero" sadly I can also tell it as if I am the "waster of opportunity". LIfe happens, much of it is pretty rubbish from my perspective, the only choice seems to be whether you try and comport yourself with a good heart grace and dignity, or whether you choose a different path.

Although I clearly picked a side when it comes down to which forum I prefer to inhabit, I believe that if I tomorrow to have a flash of insight as to how to levitate Mr Mikado's (or for that matter my own!) house, I would instantly communicate it to him despite his previous demonstrated bad faith, so yes I can see why no-one in their right mind would entrust me with any great gravitational secrets.

What bad faith would that be then? He has been generous and even offered to answer FB questions. He has made it abundantly clear that he wants Linda Brown to disappear and never mention him. She cannot do so. If you want to be trusted then one starts by giving trust. FB has been informed on many occasions that the so called 'secrets' come only if one demonstrates some level of integrity in relation to sharing data. That is not a NDA but a simple matter of mutual trust, that starts by communicating! [color=#0000BF]

It begs the question though, if you aren't going to play with him any more, what is he going to do with the Quonset hut? If he re-purposes it to a hotbed of conspiracies to use the law against itself and somehow get his money and house back, that would be a better use of the talent he has over there, than what he has been doing.

[color=#0000BF]The HUT is his and what he decides to do with it is his. FB does not know Mikado that is clear, maybe he is sane enough to realise that wasting time, effort and resources in the manner suggested. Linda should stop 'playing' altogether.

I re-read your report, and the staggering sums of money involved, and I just feel "gutted" for him. Sadly, unless there is an unexpected plot twist, he still hasn't been the good guy in the Linda Brown story...

In the Linda Brown story (fiction?) yes he would be viewed as bad guy, but the important thing is that it is a story. From another vantage point including why Linda felt it necessary to post about this, after all it has sweet FA to do with TTB. It also assumes that Linda is qualified to be his judge. Second thoughts maybe FB is on the right forum!

Fruitbat.

[Mikado14]

From what you have posted wags, it would appear that Linda is dragging the issue of my house up again and fruitbat apparently weighed in his views.

How is my family involved with her research into her Daddy?

How is it, that she readily believes everything she reads in the newspaper but claims that what newspapers etc that have printed "things" about her Daddy are false?

The only accurate statement is that the deed allowed for a house, under zoning laws, was reaffirmed on April 16, 1990 by a Common Pleas Court. The house construction loan was signed on June 21, 1990 after being affirmed by the lawyers for the Bank, the lawyers for the Title Insurance and my own lawyer that no appeals had been filed and thus it was a settled issue. After the house was under roof, the opposition found a loophole in the RCP for Chester County and got it back in court. The rest is an exercise in politics that led to the final destruction of my home at gunpoint which ended up in Federal Court and is still languishing there without a final resolution.

I suppose relying on the courts, the lawyers for the Bank and the lawyers for the title insurance makes me a "bad guy" according to Linda Brown.

So pathetic that she feels the need to discuss this and attempt to use it as character assassination tools against myself. I followed the law, I abided the law and trusted in it to build my home, of that, I am guilty.

She only proves that she is the pathetic socio/psychopath by her actions who is jealous of those who have any morals.

Mikado

[wags]

From what you have posted wags, it would appear that Linda is dragging the issue of my house up again and fruitbat apparently weighed in his views.

How is my family involved with her research into her Daddy?

There is no connection except the one in her ever evolving novel.

How is it, that she readily believes everything she reads in the newspaper but claims that what newspapers etc that have printed "things" about her Daddy are false?

I think that says it all, mind what newspaper reports are you referring to? Any links?'

The only accurate statement is that the deed allowed for a house, under zoning laws, was reaffirmed on April 16, 1990 by a Common Pleas Court. The house construction loan was signed on June 21, 1990 after being affirmed by the lawyers for the Bank, the lawyers for the Title Insurance and my own lawyer that no appeals had been filed and thus it was a settled issue. After the house was under roof, the opposition found a loophole in the RCP for Chester County and got it back in court. The rest is an exercise in politics that led to the final destruction of my home at gunpoint which ended up in Federal Court and is still languishing there without a final resolution.

I suppose relying on the courts, the lawyers for the Bank and the lawyers for the title insurance makes me a "bad guy" according to Linda Brown.

It shows you used the correct method rather than resorting to vigilantism and runs contrary to how she has portrayed you.

So pathetic that she feels the need to discuss this and attempt to use it as character assassination tools against myself. I followed the law, I abided the law and trusted in it to build my home, of that, I am guilty.

That is because she cannot use the legal framework to resolve her 'disputes' (various) as she would lose. I am particularly thinking of her claim to be the rightful owner of this site, and it has been taken from her thereby inferring that others have conned and stolen her property. She did not at any stage own this site unless she could supply the original owner which of course does not exist.



She only proves that she is the pathetic socio/psychopath by her actions who is jealous of those who have any morals.

Mikado

[kevin]

"He still hasn't been the good guy in the Linda Brown story"
That fruitcake is still on prozac.

This is a blatent attempt by Linda at further division.
Whatever the reason/s Mikados house was huffed and puffed and blown down He will know best about, and WTF does it have to do with TTB?
To then suggest that this is a reason why Mikado has been in some manner AGINST Linda is ballocks, as I for one have never seen Mikado be aginst Linda.
He sure has been vigilant in pointing to the truth, and as such has had to endure a near never ending cascade of bile thrown at Him and Kim ( sometimes to My eternal discredit backed up by Myself, stupidly believing Linda must be privvy to things I didn't know)
It is Linda who is constantly trying to paint a false picture.
Kevin