Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

[Chris Knight]

Mikado,

Your legal problems with the house and land have absolutely nothing, in any stretch of the imagination, to do with TTB. However, without an adversary to let Linda Leach play the poor, oppressed girl, she loses most of her power.

The "Linda Leach Wheel of Crazy" (or whatever Kim called it) was spun and your name happened to come up again.

Again, I apologize to everyone for giving that awful woman an internet voice to spew her nasty bile over everyone within range. Linda Leach (Brown) has done more to turn perfect strangers against each other, and people against their own nature, than anyone I've ever had the misfortune to meet.

Don't worry. Eventually, like Terrence Trent Darby, break dancing, and Lady Gaga, she will fade away, and everyone will forget her. Perhaps all that will remain will be a distaste for the work of TTB. Pity about the latter.

Cheers,

Chris

[Mikado14]

And Steve Clarke gets hit by Linda's lack of keeping things told on a personal level private. ......I am so smiling that the universe does balance things out.

http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... 124#p36124

Trust & Discretion...
Postby fruitbat » Thu Sep 17, 2015 4:45 pm

I've been somewhat disconcerted by Linda's mentioning my personal issues with Wags that were communicated in a PM a while back.
I read today that Wags is asking, for clarification of a matter only hinted at.

I will say the information that I supplied Linda was of a personal nature, referring as it does to my own lifetime battle with depression, as well the reasoning behind my change of heart as regards Wags last year, (or was it teh year before, it's been a while) and for reasons that must be obvious I would have preferred to keep that particular topic out of the public arena.
I'll be frank, the embarrassing bit is over for me now, I've suffered attacks of black depression for night on forty years now, and my readers all know it. Why I am moved to uncomfortable laughter by Wags claims of trying to "help" me however I still believe is not a suitable topic for public discussion.
So unless the public good is really going to be served, by me detailing one of wags less good moments, and then wags going back though the several periods he has known me during the last 35 years, to try and find an equal perfidy (a task at which I fear he may well fail) I shall be taking my own advice and S'tingTFU.

Also on a more practical note, If I am to have such a public fight with a former friend, I would need to be financially well compensated (as indeed should Wags to be strictly fair) and as of yet, I have no agent to write my contracts. Wags is better than me with the financials, perhaps it seem prudent to see what sort of a deal he gets, before I start fee-seeking...

How does it feel fruitbat to have your personal life, which has no bearing on TTBrown, being used to perpetuate her psychopathic tendencies on others? You will learn that anything you say to Linda is open fodder for her diatribes unleashed to serve her in any manner she sees fit....of course to her benefit.

You reap what you sow and you were warned but you ignored it but somehow, I feel it won't be the last.

There is no "Trust & Discretion..." in regard to Linda. Serves you right for ignoring the warning.

Mikado

[wags]

And Steve Clarke gets hit by Linda's lack of keeping things told on a personal level private. ......I am so smiling that the universe does balance things out.

http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... 124#p36124

Trust & Discretion...
Postby fruitbat » Thu Sep 17, 2015 4:45 pm

I've been somewhat disconcerted by Linda's mentioning my personal issues with Wags that were communicated in a PM a while back.
I read today that Wags is asking, for clarification of a matter only hinted at.

I will say the information that I supplied Linda was of a personal nature, referring as it does to my own lifetime battle with depression, as well the reasoning behind my change of heart as regards Wags last year, (or was it teh year before, it's been a while) and for reasons that must be obvious I would have preferred to keep that particular topic out of the public arena.
I'll be frank, the embarrassing bit is over for me now, I've suffered attacks of black depression for night on forty years now, and my readers all know it. Why I am moved to uncomfortable laughter by Wags claims of trying to "help" me however I still believe is not a suitable topic for public discussion.
So unless the public good is really going to be served, by me detailing one of wags less good moments, and then wags going back though the several periods he has known me during the last 35 years, to try and find an equal perfidy (a task at which I fear he may well fail) I shall be taking my own advice and S'tingTFU.

Also on a more practical note, If I am to have such a public fight with a former friend, I would need to be financially well compensated (as indeed should Wags to be strictly fair) and as of yet, I have no agent to write my contracts. Wags is better than me with the financials, perhaps it seem prudent to see what sort of a deal he gets, before I start fee-seeking...

How does it feel fruitbat to have your personal life, which has no bearing on TTBrown, being used to perpetuate her psychopathic tendencies on others? You will learn that anything you say to Linda is open fodder for her diatribes unleashed to serve her in any manner she sees fit....of course to her benefit.

You reap what you sow and you were warned but you ignored it but somehow, I feel it won't be the last.

There is no "Trust & Discretion..." in regard to Linda. Serves you right for ignoring the warning.

Mikado

I don't have any issues with FB's response indeed probably agree with most of it. In terms of claiming to have helped, clearly I have not according to FB. My point was that mutual help and support as friends do. My concern was the same in that a third party used his private thoughts and was again inferring intentional mendacious conduct. I have to accept FB has a different perspective maybe a period of quite reflection to work out what mine is would be beneficial. I am aware of one major possible area but like FB that is not for this or any forum.

[kevin]

His lordship has declared.
"The members of the hut use classic mind manipulation......."
Wat dat?
Kevin

[wags]

His lordship has declared.
"The members of the hut use classic mind manipulation......."
Wat dat?
Kevin

It is a weak allegation with no real details to comment.

On his challenging to produce a list of lies, not necessary as I am not in the game of trying to persuade or use some spooky classic mind control as to if she has or has not, beyond what I have already mentioned, for example Myles. It is deduced that Myles and Linda are one and the same; ergo a lie. What others have published is for others. Cannot expect to understand any answers without first asking the right question(S). I am dubious that FB has discovered that question. I am not obliged to provide anything to justify my own opinion to that judge,.

[wags]

A link that may help, or not:


http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... y-theoies/

It all depends on how much one can think 'one step back' to coin a phrase.

[kevin]

Wags ,
Your link won't play on My browser( whatever that is?)
I should have provided a link to His lordships declorations were the members of this forum are "EVIL"
http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... &start=110

There is also apparentely lots of deletions and such been done on this EVIL place.
If You look in a mirror( His lordship should)
Then evil becomes LIVE.

The main reason I was totally sick of that cosmic forum was fruitcake.
He adds into lots of his posts little barbed comments directed at certain posters, and were mostly not seen by the others, as in this latest garbage post a long diatribe with added in barbs.
Now the hut is the intended, and as there are posters on both forums it shows the ridiculous nature of such comments, which Linda is the main source of.
It baffles Myself how gullible many are to allow themselves to be drawn into such a mindset( maybe Mkultra is at Lindas beck and call?)
Pot calling kettle black.

Kevin ( ex gullible offender)

[wags]

Kevin,

The first question that comes to mind about the comment about HUT members being evil is:

What is FB's definition of evil.

[kevin]

Kevin,

The first question that comes to mind about the comment about HUT members being evil is:

What is FB's definition of evil.

"Promulgation of evil technique"
Here's the ten most evil techniques used by adolph...
http://brainz.org/10-most-evil-propagan ... sed-nazis/
They all appear as common practise by our present glorious so called leaders, are they evil?
Kevin

[wags]

Kevin,

The first question that comes to mind about the comment about HUT members being evil is:

What is FB's definition of evil.

"Promulgation of evil technique"
Here's the ten most evil techniques used by adolph...
http://brainz.org/10-most-evil-propagan ... sed-nazis/
They all appear as common practise by our present glorious so called leaders, are they evil?
Kevin

Again it comes down to the intent of the writer, as to what he was trying to achieve, given he is figuratively writing in Ms Brown's front parlour.