Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

[kevin]

Wags,
He demands PROOF of lies.
Then supplies exactly such Himself.

The members posting upon this forum are not creating "evil techniques of mind manipulations", as declared by FB.
HE the fruitcake has LIED.

I view such lies with total contempt.
Kevin

[wags]

Wags,
He demands PROOF of lies.
Then supplies exactly such Himself.

The members posting upon this forum are not creating "evil techniques of mind manipulations", as declared by FB.
HE the fruitcake has LIED.

I view such lies with total contempt.
Kevin

I prefer the term 'faulty thinking' in this case. Rebutting or holding a view that Linda or FB do not hold is not an evil technique or mind manipulation. If our views are to persuasive maybe it is because he has the weaker viewpoint. Can he provide the answers in relation to controversy surrounding Myles that satisfies his own implicit view that Myles is a separate individual to Linda. That issue has zero in detail with the late Mr TTB.

If however he already does know that Linda is Myles his post could be interpreted as a lie.

[Mikado14]

Well kevin, fruitbat wants lies? Here are a few I managed to throw together:


1. David Smith is Morgan (at least six individuals have been told this)

2. Harold (last name witheld) is twigsnapper (at least four individuals have been told this)

3. Helen Towt's accident was a hit and run (posted on the ttbrown forum) when clearly the record states it was an accident
.
4. She used the photo of Brenden Kelly as that of Morgan and gave it to a group of individuals (Many references to this on the forum. Photo given and shown to different individuals)

5. Terry Lee Brewer is a character named Livingston and was part of an elite group that traveled in time correcting "things" (sounds like Quantum Leap which is exactly what would be required to believe her stories). His obituary states no military service what so ever, however, there is a flag at his memorial which would indicate such. http://www.schoolerfuneralhome.com/obit ... 47454d2ec7
However, since Morgan was identified as Dave Smith and that is a lie then any associations attributed to him are a lie as well.

6. Myles - first a blind dog...then a miraculously seeing dog...then her lawyer staying at her house...and now just her lawyer (this last one might be true seeing as she uses real individuals to pattern into her imaginary characters)

7. Her Father jumped out of the NA 337 of which the facts contradict. (numerous references to this on several forums)

8. Her Father was shot in Germany. (refer to the above)

9. Martin Calloway urinated on a wall back in time as stated on the ttbrown forum. (This is impossible see reference #1 above and was a comment made by Morgan)

10. Twigsnapper stated that "items" were saved from a museum in Irag prior to it's burning/destruction. (refer to #2)

I could go on but what's the use. We have been down this road before. The above list has been stated before and others have corroborated them and yet it would appear that blindness is trait not only with little dogs but with others.

One item should be mentioned. Throughout the Due-Diligence, there has only been cries of objection without any opposing references to the contrary. Only innuendo and derogatory comments as a counter. In a roundabout manner of interpreting those actions, one could assume that "someone" has been caught in a lie. With that said, she offers only the aforesaid objections and no substance to either support the Due-Diligence or to offer counter evidence then the only conclusion that can be had on the instant is that she is a conspirator with those lying or is the source.

And one more item, she has never explained the multiple individuals from the same IP address. She has never explained Hog Island and wildcard from the History Channel forum having the same IP address. Aversion is not lying. Silence implies knowledge.

In looking at the demands for a statement of lies, this is coming from someone who has not been around this work of fiction seasoned with some truths for the past ten years. These current individuals have had no interaction of a physical nature with anyone involved but yet rely on the words of someone over the Internet/email/PM.

Linda....the catfish (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=catfish)

Mikado

[wags]

Mikado,

It wont make any difference, you know that.

lol

[Mikado14]

Mikado,

It wont make any difference, you know that.

lol

Oh absolutely!

In reading kevin's post I made mention to Kim and she said he (fruitbat?) asked for a list of 10. He got them, he has had them but not in the form as just presented.

I have found in life that sometimes we choose to believe or disbelieve based upon what we want, however, in doing so, in the Elizabethan interpretation - To thine own self be true(for those that don't wish to look up the words Polonius said to his son, he merely was stating to him to chose that which is beneficial to himself). It becomes apparent that he will believe what is most beneficial to himself and this also characterized his ability to have an open mind to change and that will and is his problem with doing any of his proclaimed research for it is so much easier to have it handed to him then to follow a quest. Is he a lazy individual and looks for short cuts in his life? This would suggest so.

He has his list, he will comment, of this I am sure and could almost predict his words.

Mikado

[wags]

He has been given the answer but he cannot concur on the cosmic token, or will at the very least feel inhibited which is understandable, he should answer on here.

[Mikado14]

I doubt that he would answer on here for she comes in here to read (even though she claims she is blocked/banned) and would readily see what he would post. No, I believe that even if he would see the truth, he will not speak it and would continue to do just as he has done in the hope of getting "something". I would not be surprised that he was offered a similar carrot as was given to several others.

Mikado

[wags]

That is a poor view, it is an awkward spot if you have any doubts about Linda. That or he thinks he can contain the catfish. lol

[Mikado14]

Do they have catfish in England? I don't know.....um....I am referring to the aquatic version. Of the other, hell, the Internet is proliferated with them.

Anyway, I caught a catfish once in French Creek. It had several spines that could really give you a nasty puncture wound. Maybe that is why they call it "catfish".

Mikado

[wags]

[quote="Mikado14"]Do they have catfish in England? I don't know.....um....I am referring to the aquatic version. Of the other, hell, the Internet is proliferated with them.
[/]
Yes, though I am not a fisherman. A fish to avoid then, as they only get thrown back; or is that the other definition.