Mikado14 wrote:Well kevin, fruitbat wants lies? Here are a few I managed to throw together:
1. David Smith is Morgan (at least six individuals have been told this)
2. Harold (last name witheld) is twigsnapper (at least four individuals have been told this)
3. Helen Towt's accident was a hit and run (posted on the ttbrown forum) when clearly the record states it was an accident
.
4. She used the photo of Brenden Kelly as that of Morgan and gave it to a group of individuals (Many references to this on the forum. Photo given and shown to different individuals)
5. Terry Lee Brewer is a character named Livingston and was part of an elite group that traveled in time correcting "things" (sounds like Quantum Leap which is exactly what would be required to believe her stories). His obituary states no military service what so ever, however, there is a flag at his memorial which would indicate such.
http://www.schoolerfuneralhome.com/obit ... 47454d2ec7However, since Morgan was identified as Dave Smith and that is a lie then any associations attributed to him are a lie as well.
6. Myles - first a blind dog...then a miraculously seeing dog...then her lawyer staying at her house...and now just her lawyer (this last one might be true seeing as she uses real individuals to pattern into her imaginary characters)
7. Her Father jumped out of the NA 337 of which the facts contradict. (numerous references to this on several forums)
8. Her Father was shot in Germany. (refer to the above)
9. Martin Calloway urinated on a wall back in time as stated on the ttbrown forum. (This is impossible see reference #1 above and was a comment made by Morgan)
10. Twigsnapper stated that "items" were saved from a museum in Irag prior to it's burning/destruction. (refer to #2)
I could go on but what's the use. We have been down this road before. The above list has been stated before and others have corroborated them and yet it would appear that blindness is trait not only with little dogs but with others.
One item should be mentioned. Throughout the Due-Diligence, there has only been cries of objection without any opposing references to the contrary. Only innuendo and derogatory comments as a counter. In a roundabout manner of interpreting those actions, one could assume that "someone" has been caught in a lie. With that said, she offers only the aforesaid objections and no substance to either support the Due-Diligence or to offer counter evidence then the only conclusion that can be had on the instant is that she is a conspirator with those lying or is the source.
And one more item, she has never explained the multiple individuals from the same IP address. She has never explained Hog Island and wildcard from the History Channel forum having the same IP address. Aversion is not lying. Silence implies knowledge.
In looking at the demands for a statement of lies, this is coming from someone who has not been around this work of fiction seasoned with some truths for the past ten years. These current individuals have had no interaction of a physical nature with anyone involved but yet rely on the words of someone over the Internet/email/PM.
Linda....the catfish (
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=catfish)
Mikado