fruitbat wrote:Like I said, I am a simpleton, not a sophisticate, and I am asking a question of someone who's byline suggests that he will provide me with an argument but not an understanding, so perhaps my question could be seen as a rhetorical thing, perhaps even represented as "disingenuous", but actually, I really just don't understand an awful lot of the hut related stuff. At least over here, the fresh information outweighs the controversial matter (which to me speaks volumes about the intent of the operation and participants of either forum), and whilst I still don't like it when Linda draws our attention towards the hut, it is quite awesome to see how comprehensively one senior woman "owns" at least 5 grown men, whilst simultaneously running a website, a dog breeding business, a well developed family and love life, and does a whole lot of other stuff.
wags is correct, if I understand what he says in regard to you, you are thick as a brick. Have you taken the time to look at who posts first? Who is the one that is obsessed or is displaying obsessive behaviour? A fair interpretation is that "at least 5 grown men" (I have only counted 4 but then who am I to argue with you) have free rent in one senior woman's head. I only ever see kevin comment in regard to what Linda posts. I post in response to some comment she makes as a form of rebuttal. As to her running a website....really?...you think having a website/forum is all that difficult?
As to the dog breeding business....I thought she was selling all her dogs since she was going to travel....was that just bullshit? Afterall, she does post a good deal about being on the road and running a kennel would not be too terribly cost effective in the long run and last but not the least...."a well developed family and love life.."? Geez...where were you in 2010 when she was finding every excuse in the book to come east or have Dave fly out there for a road trip? OH!....I see what you mean. "well developed" as in keeping up with two men, George and Dave...news flash...As long as I knew Linda, she slept on the couch and George had the bedroom and even locked the door when he went to bed.
As to a whole lot of other stuff....I wonder if Linda ever settled her workman's comp claim and that is how she is able to afford to do so much travelling? George is very tight with the buck, so much so that when Linda had the accident and wrecked her car, he wouldn't get her a replacement. I am sure she has another vehicle by now or she is just driving around the old truck.
I am commenting on what you say for I find it incredulous that you know so much about all that you said without setting one foot out of merry ole England. You have never met her face to face or interacted with her in any physical capacity....but yet you can make statements based on.....? You have never met myself, kevin, Kim or Andy Bolland but yet you know all about us and judge us. I have another news flash....what you are seeing is the result of actions and interactions with Linda that occurred long before your arrival. With the exception of kevin, and of course wags, all have had many interactions with Linda and speak from their personal experiences with her. So...how many times have you met Linda in person?
Just remember, this "Lily of the Valley" you are so eager to vouch for is the one who starts it all. The one who states she will not come to the Hut since it is such a "cesspool" but yet copies from the cesspool and posts in her forum. Don't you find that a wee bit contradictory?
And remember, she came out of the blue and attacked Kim in regard to her son and you even got into the act. What bearing did that have on Townsend Brown? And last but not least, who the fuck do you think you are to involve yourself in regard to Kim's son as you did? That entire incident that she started was by design to inflict emotional distress and you partook in it.
And here is a nice video that explains exactly what Linda is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRTkCHE1sS4
Mikado
lol
