Well.. it sure is a mouth full...
Somewhere under that whale is a minnow... but is it still alive...
<b>-1- </b>Excitation fld = <b>-2- </b>Fast time(not our slow time grav field) although gravity is in this seperate spectrum with excitation and is inversely related. <b>-3- </b>Excitation occurs naturally in mag vortex under specific conditions OR occurs artifically(ufos & now our TAV AF space craft) through magnetic vortex,electric vacuum in resonance...go ask Einstein,Von Neumann,Tesla,..or Linda's dad. <b>-4-</b> Excitation "excites" electrons or controls them--accelerating them (electrons must absorb energy or be accelerated)....<b>-5- </b>.accelerating them past ionization potential to FTL(faster than light) ....which causes less charge in those electrons ..<b>-6-</b>which allows for transitions to occur(I'll explain those in min) that require almost no energy. WELL gee whiz, what transitions?....ALL of the following transitions occur in FTL excitation fld =reuced Grav,mass,inertia....shifts in frequencies, AND TIME is accelerated...What's that sound like to you....Aether also???
<b>1-Excitation field</b> : a form/type of energy added /induced into the atomic structure, could be a result of heat(infra-red radiation), pressure (indirectly induced heat), electric field(E), magnetic field(B), background aether support field interaction .. Remind's me of peetee’s F=MA in the science class, in that there is no fixed definition that says the force has to actually involve mass “at any timeâ€, it could be radiation “em†pressure force, bypassing traditional high-school physics altogether. Rockets guns and jets use mass-ejection... Don’t forget superconductors and mag field ejection . Do you mean an excitation field as in an externally applied energy, or a self generated product, or ??
<b>2-Fast time</b>: this raises a few flags, personal-conjecture: if energy is added to a system it must impact the overall instance/existence of all atomic structures within that localised boundary. I posted a thought experiment a while ago... does charge density impact time... sort of in the field and on the trail. Are you saying that energy density will speed up the “apparent time†inside the field/area? Or does the time outside the field/area “apparently†speed up. The consequences of it speeding up inside the field are that the occupants of the field will age “faster†than those outside... What good is a 9 hour flight/trip to the planet Mars, if you age 3 years on the way there. Leave home as a 30 year old dad and come back 5 years later as 50 year old dad, ... no thanks.
As to the impact being inverse .. what about, squared, cubed, square-root.. or to the power of “e†, logarithmic, sequential, binary, 1/root-x^C ... etc . what evidence supports the statement...
<b>3-excitation occurs naturally</b>: well...yes, we live in an electromagnetic universe. The planet, sun, galaxy is electrically “charged†and varying with time.
<b>-4- accelerating them (electrons must absorb energy or be accelerated)....</b>... actually NO.. limited range of thinking applied to the instance..what about the electron reflecting energy, it does not have to absorb energy. It can also shed energy, Can you fit more drink into a glass that is already totally full. But absorption would change the characteristic behaviour of the electron and hence by implication its immediate environment. ..
<b> -5- </b> accelerating them past ionization potential to FTL(faster than light) ....which causes less charge in those electrons </b>: mumbo jumbo to me , past ionization is really “through ionisation†it is an intermediate process... look at the nuclear bomb... it does not jump past one level to the final end process... it progresses through all the stages.. .quickly. One of those can ruin your whole day.
Moderation...
If you progress beyond ionisation you enter the high energy plasma realm, then into the realm of what happens inside the sun, atomic “reorganisationâ€., complex magnetic and electric field interactions creating dense spinning areas of ### that have energy, hence resulting in “matterâ€.
FTL...?? do you need ftl.. what about sidestepping space altogether...or time itself,?.
<b>Causes less charge on the electron.. </b> ?? I could accept “altered state†or “transitioning phase/state†but what good is less charge ... haven’t you added energy to it to get through the ionisation process for starters, now it suddenly has less charge/energy?. Where did it shed the energy and to what form, and what have you accomplished by doing so.
<b>-6- which allows for transitions to occur(I'll explain those in min) that require almost no energy. WELL gee whiz, what transitions?....ALL of the following transitions occur in FTL excitation fld =reuced Grav,mass,inertia....shifts in frequencies, AND TIME is accelerated...Whats that sound like to you....Aether also???</b>
Transitions: which way .. what transition do you mean.. there are many, no energy!! Sorry aint gunna happen...
Reduced gravity: -with which interaction do you achieve this?.
Mass: -assuming you mean reduced-mass also for this item is inside a linked list of objects preceding it, if the mass is reduced, where has the mass gone, into what form,
Inertia: -also part of the linked list so Im assuming you also mean reduced-inertia. How is inertia impacted?
Time accelerated: -back to this again...enter the field and age at a very fast rate... and leave an old man. ... count me out.. I want to enjoy my already limited lifespan.
Short version;
Energy, density and systematic fluctuations thereof cause perturbations within a localised environment.
I think there is more than one minnow under the whale...
The ferns are waving in the breeze...
arc
The future lays not beneath our feet, but rather beneath the stars.