Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

[Nancy_Hutchison]

Kevin,

Imagining a 4D Universe is about as far as I can go.

Wags,
What do you define as a 4D universe?
Nancy

[Nancy_Hutchison]

Love these trees at Ta Prohm temple,
http://www.molon.de/galleries/Cambodia/ ... php?pic=10
Kevin

wow

[wags]

Kevin,

Imagining a 4D Universe is about as far as I can go.

Wags,
What do you define as a 4D universe?
Nancy

X, Y, Z and Time.

Therefore an atom is not a quantum unit but a thread one quantum wide. That is my interpretation of what Kevin was talking. This does not necessarily represent my own view.

[wags]

I wish that people here would learn how to present their side of the story
ie....IMO...
ie...it appears to me
ie...from what I see
ie..."when you said XXXX, I saw YYYY"

Accept that a person has a viewpoint
There is no right or wrong viewpoint

If we can't respect each other, and that a person has a particular viewpoint, then how can we exchange information?

Nancy

It all sounds so reasonable but there are exceptions:-

A person can be respected for having a viewpoint however it may be wrong. It also forgets that some people deliberately misrepresent facts to fit a delusion. (This is a general point not specific to any poster)

The world is full of fantasist and just plain stupid.

Define "wrong".

It is my perspective that you bullied me.
I own that perspective.
It is your perspective that you did not bully me.
You own that perspective.

IMO...Neither of us is "right" or "wrong".

Nancy

No I do not accept we agree on what the definition of real bullying is.

[Nancy_Hutchison]

I wish that people here would learn how to present their side of the story
ie....IMO...
ie...it appears to me
ie...from what I see
ie..."when you said XXXX, I saw YYYY"

Accept that a person has a viewpoint
There is no right or wrong viewpoint

If we can't respect each other, and that a person has a particular viewpoint, then how can we exchange information?

Nancy

It all sounds so reasonable but there are exceptions:-

A person can be respected for having a viewpoint however it may be wrong. It also forgets that some people deliberately misrepresent facts to fit a delusion. (This is a general point not specific to any poster)

The world is full of fantasist and just plain stupid.

Define "wrong".

It is my perspective that you bullied me.
I own that perspective.
It is your perspective that you did not bully me.
You own that perspective.

IMO...Neither of us is "right" or "wrong".

Nancy

No I do not accept we agree on what the definition of real bullying is.

I did not say that we agree on what the definition of real bullying is

[wags]

Nancy,

Please define your symptoms as a statement saying you feel bullied is insufficient.

[wags]

Nancy
Define Bullying?

[Nancy_Hutchison]

<snip>
Accept that a person has a viewpoint
There is no right or wrong viewpoint

If we can't respect each other, and that a person has a particular viewpoint, then how can we exchange information?
And if we can't exchange information in this open thread, then I would appreciate having a private thread that Kevin and I can use.

Nancy

Smart advice, I will remind you of your words in the future.

Fine Nancy, the thread will stay but I have one request. Stop making comments about thread derailing and the subsequent chastisement that comes forth for the elimination of such was the purpose the private thread was made. I did that for both of you to converse and help in that regard and I feel I am getting crap about it. No good deed goes unpunished.

The more I attempt to be neutral the more I get drug into the fracas. Have your conversations, please, but I will only be responding when you bring my name into it as you did with the comparison to Linda and Steve Clarke which I am waiting for a direct answer in regard or a technical statement is made that is patently false.

Mikado

Mikado,
I did a scan through on my comments on this thread, trying to find the comment I made that you want me to address.
My apologies, I did not find it. Please link or copy and paste. I will answer your concern.
Nancy

[Nancy_Hutchison]

Kevin,

Imagining a 4D Universe is about as far as I can go.

Wags,
What do you define as a 4D universe?
Nancy

X, Y, Z and Time.

Therefore an atom is not a quantum unit but a thread one quantum wide. That is my interpretation of what Kevin was talking. This does not necessarily represent my own view.

what is your view?

[Nancy_Hutchison]

Nancy,

Please define your symptoms as a statement saying you feel bullied is insufficient.

My apologies, I do not understand your words.