Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

No sides to this table. A place where anything goes. Just be polite and leave the hard core vulgarities alone, anyway, the forum won't let you post them.
Forum rules
Act like an adult, no prepubescent children, even if it means an argument but do so with a calm demeanor.

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby wags » Sun Aug 31, 2014 2:57 pm

Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
wags wrote:
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
wags wrote:Kevin,

Imagining a 4D Universe is about as far as I can go.


Wags,
What do you define as a 4D universe?
Nancy


X, Y, Z and Time.

Therefore an atom is not a quantum unit but a thread one quantum wide. That is my interpretation of what Kevin was talking. This does not necessarily represent my own view.


what is your view?


Can you keep a secret?
Boswell : ‘I have provided you with an argument, but I am not obliged to supply an understanding"
User avatar
wags
Commander
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:46 am
Location: South Saxons Kingdom, Angleland

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby wags » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:00 pm

Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
wags wrote:Nancy,

Please define your symptoms as a statement saying you feel bullied is insufficient.


My apologies, I do not understand your words.


Yes you do. IMHO
Boswell : ‘I have provided you with an argument, but I am not obliged to supply an understanding"
User avatar
wags
Commander
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:46 am
Location: South Saxons Kingdom, Angleland

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby Nancy_Hutchison » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:05 pm

wags wrote:Nancy
Define Bullying?


thank you for asking
my definition of bullying is when a person (bully) wants something from another person (victim)
the victim does not provide (give) what the bully wants
so the bully then uses tactics to try to extract what he/she wants from the victim
these tactics can be many things, such as
physical force, name calling, attempts to discredit the victim, actions to alienate the victim from others, engaging others to take action against the victim

if you would like me to point out how you did these things to me, I will do so

how do you define bullying?
Nancy_Hutchison
Lt. Commander
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:19 pm

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby Nancy_Hutchison » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:06 pm

wags wrote:
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
wags wrote:
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
wags wrote:Kevin,

Imagining a 4D Universe is about as far as I can go.


Wags,
What do you define as a 4D universe?
Nancy


X, Y, Z and Time.

Therefore an atom is not a quantum unit but a thread one quantum wide. That is my interpretation of what Kevin was talking. This does not necessarily represent my own view.


what is your view?


Can you keep a secret?


LOL...do you want a private thread for discussion?
Nancy_Hutchison
Lt. Commander
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:19 pm

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby kevin » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:09 pm

Wags,
The constant checking of that which I was detecting, and drawing it out enabled Me to begin to think spherically, to see the geometry forming torroidal heart centred dual vortexs.
Once I reached the realisation that nothing was MOVING as such the dimensions within the geometries became clear in My thoughts.
It's too complicated for Me to verbalise or draw.
But it is based on the structure of the perfectly packed substance of universe, with the resultant faces been where each dimension exists within each other dimension.
Thus within You now is multi dimensions existing at the self same location as You do( this is where the so called aliens reside, imo)
Those so called aliens probably been ourselves upon alternate dimensions.

Kevin
kevin
The Hobbit
 
Posts: 2901
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby Nancy_Hutchison » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:10 pm

wags wrote:
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
wags wrote:Nancy,

Please define your symptoms as a statement saying you feel bullied is insufficient.


My apologies, I do not understand your words.


Yes you do. IMHO


okay, I'll try
tell me if this is a correct understanding of your words:
please define...state in detail?
your symptoms...ahhh...this is where I get confused...do you want me to state how I was harmed, how your actions hurt me?
saying you feel bullied is insufficient....my statement that I feel you bullied me is not enough, you need more.
Nancy_Hutchison
Lt. Commander
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:19 pm

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby Mikado14 » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:10 pm

Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
Mikado14 wrote:
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:<snip>
Accept that a person has a viewpoint
There is no right or wrong viewpoint

If we can't respect each other, and that a person has a particular viewpoint, then how can we exchange information?
And if we can't exchange information in this open thread, then I would appreciate having a private thread that Kevin and I can use.

Nancy


Smart advice, I will remind you of your words in the future.

Fine Nancy, the thread will stay but I have one request. Stop making comments about thread derailing and the subsequent chastisement that comes forth for the elimination of such was the purpose the private thread was made. I did that for both of you to converse and help in that regard and I feel I am getting crap about it. No good deed goes unpunished.

The more I attempt to be neutral the more I get drug into the fracas. Have your conversations, please, but I will only be responding when you bring my name into it as you did with the comparison to Linda and Steve Clarke which I am waiting for a direct answer in regard or a technical statement is made that is patently false.

Mikado


Mikado,
I did a scan through on my comments on this thread, trying to find the comment I made that you want me to address.
My apologies, I did not find it. Please link or copy and paste. I will answer your concern.
Nancy


Here is the link

viewtopic.php?p=34565#p34565

Nancy_Hutchison wrote:To me, the parallels between the situation with my now deceased brother and the conflicts with wags/Linda/Steve...even Mikado
are striking.




My curiosity lies within those parallels and how I am associated with Linda and Steve Clarke.

Mikado
The thing about Inner Circles is that they are like Boxes - difficult to think outside of them.

"When the Debate is Lost, Slander is the Tool of the Loser" SOCRATES

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Mikado14
Commander
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:38 am
Location: Located where I want to be...or not...depends on the day.

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby Nancy_Hutchison » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:13 pm

kevin wrote:Wags,
The constant checking of that which I was detecting, and drawing it out enabled Me to begin to think spherically, to see the geometry forming torroidal heart centred dual vortexs.
Once I reached the realisation that nothing was MOVING as such the dimensions within the geometries became clear in My thoughts.
It's too complicated for Me to verbalise or draw.
But it is based on the structure of the perfectly packed substance of universe, with the resultant faces been where each dimension exists within each other dimension.
Thus within You now is multi dimensions existing at the self same location as You do( this is where the so called aliens reside, imo)
Those so called aliens probably been ourselves upon alternate dimensions.

Kevin


Ten minutes before my brother suddenly passed away, he sent an email out to my mom and me
saying something very similar....multi dimensions existing at the self same location...but he was talking about "angels appearing and disappearing"

Nancy
Nancy_Hutchison
Lt. Commander
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:19 pm

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby wags » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:15 pm

Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
wags wrote:Nancy
Define Bullying?


thank you for asking
my definition of bullying is when a person (bully) wants something from another person (victim)
the victim does not provide (give) what the bully wants
so the bully then uses tactics to try to extract what he/she wants from the victim
these tactics can be many things, such as
physical force, name calling, attempts to discredit the victim, actions to alienate the victim from others, engaging others to take action against the victim

if you would like me to point out how you did these things to me, I will do so

how do you define bullying?


A bully seeks to control and manipulate the mind, emotions and reality of a target for only the purpose of control or if that fails elimination of the target.

Your list is incomplete.
Boswell : ‘I have provided you with an argument, but I am not obliged to supply an understanding"
User avatar
wags
Commander
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:46 am
Location: South Saxons Kingdom, Angleland

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby wags » Sun Aug 31, 2014 3:18 pm

Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
wags wrote:
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
wags wrote:Nancy,

Please define your symptoms as a statement saying you feel bullied is insufficient.


My apologies, I do not understand your words.


Yes you do. IMHO


okay, I'll try
tell me if this is a correct understanding of your words:
please define...state in detail?
your symptoms...ahhh...this is where I get confused...do you want me to state how I was harmed, how your actions hurt me?
saying you feel bullied is insufficient....my statement that I feel you bullied me is not enough, you need more.


Correct
Boswell : ‘I have provided you with an argument, but I am not obliged to supply an understanding"
User avatar
wags
Commander
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:46 am
Location: South Saxons Kingdom, Angleland

PreviousNext

Return to The Round Table



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest

cron