The Quonset Hut

To understand the mechanism of energy exchange, we first need to understand it. Most people assume that they understand energy exchange because they buy and use it every day; Accordingly no further thought is needed.

This is a logical trap because our human scale experiences are not a guide for the real energy exchanges that take place on the quantum level of electron and atoms.

The mechanism of energy transfer had often been sought using Maxwell's Equations (ME) and electromagnetic waves but the method has problems: The electron has spherical symmetry but MEs have no wave solutions in spherical coordinates

In 1945 Wheeler and Feynman (W&F) sought the mechanism of energy transfer by calculating electro-magnetic radiation from an accelerated electron. Their electron generated outward and inward spherical waves and evoked a response of the universe from absorber charges.

W&F calculated the electron mainly to find a fundamental understanding of the universe so they looked at many ideas. They discussed this with Einstein who suggested a proposal by Tetrode that light was two-way communication exchange between source and receiver utilizing in- and out-waves.

Their accelerated electron generated both in- and out-waves. The out-waves then stimulated absorber charges elsewhere in the universe whose waves returned to the initial charge, a response of the Universe. Upon arrival, those waves became in-waves of the initial charge. Remarkably (but as they intended) causality was not violated because they cancelled in-waves from the absorbers upon arrival at the initial charge by opposite inwaves from the charge!

W&F’s work goes beyond explaining radiation forces because energy transfer and the motion of matter are important fundamental processes of nature. Further their concept, that the absorbers in the whole universe contributes to each electron, implies an interconnection, i.e., Every charged particle is part of the universe and the universe is part of each charged particle. This implies that each of us, including you and me, are connected together as part of the observable universe! This fundamental but revolutionary concept is still not recognized by mainstream physics.

The wave medium - the space around us - is the ONE source of matter and the natural laws. Since the waves of each particle are inter-mingled with the waves of other matter and all contribute to the density of the medium, it follows that every charged particle is part of the universe and the universe is part of each charged particle.

Whole paper can be found here : http://www.thehealinguniverse.com/library/141bem.pdf

I am curious as to where this is headed.

Mikado

Mikado14 wrote:I am curious as to where this is headed.

I wish I could say, or clarify, anything here. I too am very curious and would like to see this explained, or discussed.

Do you see the implications ? I mean, if I understand this correctly, these guys - in 1945 - were able to prove that a "charged particle is part of the universe and the universe is part of each charged particle".

Now, this is mind shattering.

And one has to wonder why, 70 years afterwards, this "revolutionary concept is still not recognized by mainstream physics". Wonder, and wonder with extreme prejudice.

A lot of what I have been reading lately - and this "paper" is just an example - has made me profoundly regret my having squandered my intelect and "academic" education on fields which, yes, were and are fascinating ... but meaningless. I am not equipped with the "tools" to "understand" this that I read, just to wonder about it. Were I to backtrack my years and return to my choice years, I would have chosen differently. Were my excellent teachers in some domains formed in other "fields", and by that been able to instill in me the thirst I got in domains that not physics, and now I would not be burdened with the gut wrenching ignorance that impedes "understanding" what I can only "wonder" about.

Too late, now. My brain has been "formated" with a matrix fixed on a different axis.

Nevertheless, I am able to "understand" that "our human scale experiences are not a guide for the real energy exchanges that take place on the quantum level of electron and atoms" and that, apparently, no one gives - seriously - a crap about it.

Except a few wackos. And U-Boat Kapitans.

Discovery of quantum vibrations in 'microtubules' corroborates theory of consciousness.

A review and update of a controversial 20-year-old theory of consciousness published in Physics of Life Reviews claims that consciousness derives from deeper level, finer scale activities inside brain neurons.

They suggest that EEG rhythms (brain waves) also derive from deeper level microtubule vibrations, and that from a practical standpoint, treating brain microtubule vibrations could benefit a host of mental, neurological, and cognitive conditions.

The theory, called "orchestrated objective reduction" ('Orch OR'), was first put forward in the mid-1990s by eminent mathematical physicist Sir Roger Penrose, FRS, Mathematical Institute and Wadham College, University of Oxford, and prominent anesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff, MD, Anesthesiology, Psychology and Center for Consciousness Studies, The University of Arizona, Tucson. They suggested that quantum vibrational computations in microtubules were "orchestrated" ("Orch") by synaptic inputs and memory stored in microtubules, and terminated by Penrose "objective reduction" ('OR'), hence "Orch OR." Microtubules are major components of the cell structural skeleton.

"The origin of consciousness reflects our place in the universe, the nature of our existence. Did consciousness evolve from complex computations among brain neurons, as most scientists assert? Or has consciousness, in some sense, been here all along, as spiritual approaches maintain?" ask Hameroff and Penrose in the current review.

An important new facet of the theory is introduced. Microtubule quantum vibrations (e.g. in megahertz) appear to interfere and produce much slower EEG "beat frequencies." Despite a century of clinical use, the underlying origins of EEG rhythms have remained a mystery.

Penrose, Hameroff and Bandyopadhyay will explore their theories during a session on "Microtubules and the Big Consciousness Debate" at the Brainstorm Sessions, a public three-day event at the Brakke Grond in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, January 16-18, 2014.

Full article here : http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Disco ... s_999.html
Further in-depth reading here : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 4513001188

Brain surgery, thankfully, has improved. I remember nail gun guy from Littleton Hospital some years ago. He probably wouldn't have survived ten years earlier. ECT for mental illness has also improved. But so much exploration of the brain is still limited to post-mortem. If someone finds a key to unlock the living brain's door to function, it would change life for a lot of people.

Cat

StarCat wrote:Brain surgery, thankfully, has improved. I remember nail gun guy from Littleton Hospital some years ago. He probably wouldn't have survived ten years earlier. ECT for mental illness has also improved. But so much exploration of the brain is still limited to post-mortem. If someone finds a key to unlock the living brain's door to function, it would change life for a lot of people.

Cat

It would seem to me the eastern people and religions have already done so, meditation. Maybe I am misunderstanding you? My cursory exploration into this seems to indicate meditation affects brainwave frequency, within certain frequency ranges is where the work is done, such as alpha-theta-delta.

I can tell you for certain that my experience with binural tones, affecting my level of consciousness, changed me.

I was thinking more of tx for epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, cerebellar degeneration, things like that.

Cat

tx? ....help?

Mikado

I love that you are wondering about the same things I am, Luis. Sadly, I'm under a similar handicap when it comes to understanding theories of the 'intelligence field' One direction seems to be all about electrons, the other about photons of light deciding to "be".

F-A Popp's observation of water fleas, (micro-crustaceans) reportedly showed them 'sucking up' the photons emmitted by other water fleas. I haven't seen the original research, but it's such a cool thought, I want it to be true.

You're a terrific author by the way, with a ear for genre voices! Thanks for the satirical first paragraphs..I still smile when I think of them.

rose

Mikado, I would guess it's either short for treatment or a mistyped Rx.

Cat, I've been looking at a lot of brain anatomy lately. Wow, do I have a lot of catching up to do! I should get a cowbrain and dissect it, but I'm pretty sure that ain't going to happen.

rose