Adam Bull’s “Technology For a New Future”
Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 5:28 pm"He (Tesla) described relativity as a 'beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king.' In support of his statement he cited a number of experiments he had conducted as far back as 1896 on the cosmic ray. He has measured cosmic-ray velocities from Antarus, he said, which he found to be fifty times greater than the speed of light, thus demolishing, he contended, one of the basic pillars of relativity, according to which there can be no speed greater than that of light.”
-- in New York Times, 7/11/35.
Stumbled upon this Adam Bull guy. Very curious thinker. With a very curious book. Which I might read one of these days. Maybe you haven’t heard about him.
To my ignorant me, he makes a lot of sense, even if I am not equipped to say if he’s right or wrong. Only that what he says seems to me that others – in other domains or with a different language – are also saying. Or have said it, some long ago, some not so long ago. You just need to want to listen.
This is him speaking, out of his book but with it underlying, and you too might find it interesting:
The difference between steam engine like locomotion into a problem and the gentle breeze of an oscillating current transformer into a geo dynamic oscillator is the difference between a piston apparatus making lots of dampened deflection noise with a 2lb piston oscillating at delta x of delta t,
and
a perfect odd resonance harmonic coupling oscillator deflecting through the entire mass of a giant weight building or bridge, just from a mere 2lb swinging mechanical weight that can bring down buildings with an infinitely specified power by harmonic superpositioned deflections in the billions of pounds, through nothing but the storage of mechanical energy in dampening sound waves alone, specifically in the dimensions of time.
Many children ask their teachers why the ocean moves so unceasing, or why the sun and moon and stars do so. But when the child asks why the engine stops they are told that there is diminishing returns in the invention (power cannot be perpetually rotating). Whilst gravity is still not explained as a theory or even as a mathematical model adequately for it to be philosophically true conceptually, the planets and their calendars turn perpetually forevermore.
Gravity is not a cause and effect. Gravity is caused by something else. The effect is gravity. Something causes it.
Scientists, explain to me how electrons perpetually rotate around their proton's and or centers of gravity, perpetually. Explain to me why the atoms have electrons that spin around in orbit indefinitely with MASS, and MOTION indefinitely.
Electrical generators need to turn in order to generate magnetic current or electric current power, and to do that they need a fuel to cause them to turn around. The earth itself is a giant magnetic flywheel and itself is a generator of electric current from it's motion. What fuels this motor.
Light is not light. Light is dark. Light only happens when there is something the science men call mass, or rather, atoms, for the light to reflect off.
The problem is that the reflection isn't light reflecting off. It's cosmic rays pushing light out of the object. This can be proven by removing the object, and the ray will become dark again until it hits another planet like the moon, even the reflection from the moon itself is not light. Light cannot be seen in a vacuum. The light can only be seen when it leaves the vacuum.
So light does not travel in space, something else called electricity travels from each star (sun) to each planet. And when the pole of the planet work against the poles of the individual north and south pole individual magnets from the sun, then you get the light.
The science men will lie to you. They will say things like "less light reflections". The thing is, it is not light that creates the reflection. It is the cosmic ray. The cosmic ray is entirely invisible and it can pass through almost anything. Even things that electrons cannot. Enterprising scientists know how important this could be when it comes to the sub divisible particles of matter. The rays from the stars motion running against the motion of the planet iron core transformer that generates life and light, heat is to be thanked.
There is no heat in space. So there is no light in space.
The cosmic rays, create light, but they are not much of a light when passing through a vacuum or a vacuum tube i.e. the north and south pole streams (or lines of force) of magnetism create light when run against another north and south pole.
The magnetic poles of each planet and star can travel through the vacuum of space as cosmic rays, just like the magnetic particles of individual north and south pole magnet can go through a vacuum tube. These particles of north and south pole in a turbine can still be used to create light upon leaving the dark and empty vacuum of space.
Even if the cosmic ray, traveling faster than the speed of light through the "resistanceless vacuum", as soon as it comes accross the particles in the atmosphere which also have the positive protons north pole and the negative electrons south pole, then there will be resistance again, and so there will be light. Or rather what I established the scientists wrongly call reflections.
If the reflected photons were made to be represented by the suns and stars cosmic rays hitting the existing particles in every atom and pushing out the north and south pole orbits to create the light, then it would be alright.
But the scientists believe that light is a reflection, when actually when the cosmic ray gets out of a vacuum there can only then be light, and when it gets out of the vacuum and hits some mass to so-called "reflect", a different particle of light is emitted.
If the scientists made it so that the cosmic ray had no light, and was electricity, and when that electricity hit any atom with mass and squeezed out a new photon light particle it would be OK, but currently light is represented wrongly as a reflection when it is clearly an interaction with the media that produces the light. Or the space itself would be full of light, as the vacuum tube would be. Something we know is not the case. Light is only generated outside of the vacuum bulb, and not within it.
Light is generated by resistance, in a wire, in the same way that the light is generated in the air from the cosmic rays of stars and suns, and even the moon.
Light is NOT, repeat not produced by SUNS. Light is produced by the faster than light cosmic rays emitted by them reacting with the north and south pole individual magnets of other atoms. Which arises in the Quantum Electro Dyanamic theory of reflection percent chance.
The author estimates that there is enough energy from the stars alone touching this planet every year to run the planet for several million and look after all life on it. This is what created the species in their great number, and many magnetic metals on this earth. The earth has not stopped spinning, and neither has each planet. Each planet is a field magnet, so an orbiting field coil with a magnet inside it passing each pole could create electricity from the perpetual motion of the earth.
In a society where men fight; the chance of gravity becoming weaponised is a serious concern, the concern being that it might be the last weapon of all weapons. And so in every "golden age" there is the plight to risk total annihilation or risk living absolute mediocrity and extinction by self instead of by technology.
There comes a time, where the human condition of the men that know the secret on this planet being watched by the eyes of these men can no longer stay silent. The risk to the destruction of humanity by our own mediocrity might be as or more dangerous than the risk of this new fanciful technology.
There comes a time where things must be un-suppressed and Tesla's faster than light technology and gravitic energy transfer technology must benefit man. Less it's removal might breed far more terrible things than the greatest liberation of man. Such as his imprisonment.
We must resist our schooling or we might have no education.
-- in New York Times, 7/11/35.
Stumbled upon this Adam Bull guy. Very curious thinker. With a very curious book. Which I might read one of these days. Maybe you haven’t heard about him.
To my ignorant me, he makes a lot of sense, even if I am not equipped to say if he’s right or wrong. Only that what he says seems to me that others – in other domains or with a different language – are also saying. Or have said it, some long ago, some not so long ago. You just need to want to listen.
This is him speaking, out of his book but with it underlying, and you too might find it interesting:
The difference between steam engine like locomotion into a problem and the gentle breeze of an oscillating current transformer into a geo dynamic oscillator is the difference between a piston apparatus making lots of dampened deflection noise with a 2lb piston oscillating at delta x of delta t,
and
a perfect odd resonance harmonic coupling oscillator deflecting through the entire mass of a giant weight building or bridge, just from a mere 2lb swinging mechanical weight that can bring down buildings with an infinitely specified power by harmonic superpositioned deflections in the billions of pounds, through nothing but the storage of mechanical energy in dampening sound waves alone, specifically in the dimensions of time.
Many children ask their teachers why the ocean moves so unceasing, or why the sun and moon and stars do so. But when the child asks why the engine stops they are told that there is diminishing returns in the invention (power cannot be perpetually rotating). Whilst gravity is still not explained as a theory or even as a mathematical model adequately for it to be philosophically true conceptually, the planets and their calendars turn perpetually forevermore.
Gravity is not a cause and effect. Gravity is caused by something else. The effect is gravity. Something causes it.
Scientists, explain to me how electrons perpetually rotate around their proton's and or centers of gravity, perpetually. Explain to me why the atoms have electrons that spin around in orbit indefinitely with MASS, and MOTION indefinitely.
Electrical generators need to turn in order to generate magnetic current or electric current power, and to do that they need a fuel to cause them to turn around. The earth itself is a giant magnetic flywheel and itself is a generator of electric current from it's motion. What fuels this motor.
Light is not light. Light is dark. Light only happens when there is something the science men call mass, or rather, atoms, for the light to reflect off.
The problem is that the reflection isn't light reflecting off. It's cosmic rays pushing light out of the object. This can be proven by removing the object, and the ray will become dark again until it hits another planet like the moon, even the reflection from the moon itself is not light. Light cannot be seen in a vacuum. The light can only be seen when it leaves the vacuum.
So light does not travel in space, something else called electricity travels from each star (sun) to each planet. And when the pole of the planet work against the poles of the individual north and south pole individual magnets from the sun, then you get the light.
The science men will lie to you. They will say things like "less light reflections". The thing is, it is not light that creates the reflection. It is the cosmic ray. The cosmic ray is entirely invisible and it can pass through almost anything. Even things that electrons cannot. Enterprising scientists know how important this could be when it comes to the sub divisible particles of matter. The rays from the stars motion running against the motion of the planet iron core transformer that generates life and light, heat is to be thanked.
There is no heat in space. So there is no light in space.
The cosmic rays, create light, but they are not much of a light when passing through a vacuum or a vacuum tube i.e. the north and south pole streams (or lines of force) of magnetism create light when run against another north and south pole.
The magnetic poles of each planet and star can travel through the vacuum of space as cosmic rays, just like the magnetic particles of individual north and south pole magnet can go through a vacuum tube. These particles of north and south pole in a turbine can still be used to create light upon leaving the dark and empty vacuum of space.
Even if the cosmic ray, traveling faster than the speed of light through the "resistanceless vacuum", as soon as it comes accross the particles in the atmosphere which also have the positive protons north pole and the negative electrons south pole, then there will be resistance again, and so there will be light. Or rather what I established the scientists wrongly call reflections.
If the reflected photons were made to be represented by the suns and stars cosmic rays hitting the existing particles in every atom and pushing out the north and south pole orbits to create the light, then it would be alright.
But the scientists believe that light is a reflection, when actually when the cosmic ray gets out of a vacuum there can only then be light, and when it gets out of the vacuum and hits some mass to so-called "reflect", a different particle of light is emitted.
If the scientists made it so that the cosmic ray had no light, and was electricity, and when that electricity hit any atom with mass and squeezed out a new photon light particle it would be OK, but currently light is represented wrongly as a reflection when it is clearly an interaction with the media that produces the light. Or the space itself would be full of light, as the vacuum tube would be. Something we know is not the case. Light is only generated outside of the vacuum bulb, and not within it.
Light is generated by resistance, in a wire, in the same way that the light is generated in the air from the cosmic rays of stars and suns, and even the moon.
Light is NOT, repeat not produced by SUNS. Light is produced by the faster than light cosmic rays emitted by them reacting with the north and south pole individual magnets of other atoms. Which arises in the Quantum Electro Dyanamic theory of reflection percent chance.
The author estimates that there is enough energy from the stars alone touching this planet every year to run the planet for several million and look after all life on it. This is what created the species in their great number, and many magnetic metals on this earth. The earth has not stopped spinning, and neither has each planet. Each planet is a field magnet, so an orbiting field coil with a magnet inside it passing each pole could create electricity from the perpetual motion of the earth.
In a society where men fight; the chance of gravity becoming weaponised is a serious concern, the concern being that it might be the last weapon of all weapons. And so in every "golden age" there is the plight to risk total annihilation or risk living absolute mediocrity and extinction by self instead of by technology.
There comes a time, where the human condition of the men that know the secret on this planet being watched by the eyes of these men can no longer stay silent. The risk to the destruction of humanity by our own mediocrity might be as or more dangerous than the risk of this new fanciful technology.
There comes a time where things must be un-suppressed and Tesla's faster than light technology and gravitic energy transfer technology must benefit man. Less it's removal might breed far more terrible things than the greatest liberation of man. Such as his imprisonment.
We must resist our schooling or we might have no education.
) to move the trillions of watts of energy in the ocean from side to side. Instead of powering a machine from the ocean that is effected by the invisible wireless wave, Tesla, Leedskalnin and the pyramid builders found a way to intercept that invisible wireless cosmic ray that comes from the moon to make the ocean move.