The Quonset Hut

Fecal matter is the left over of that which has been used by the body for fuel.
You can learn a lot from fecal matter.
What has been used for fuel, what the body has rejected and how well the digestive system is working.
Fecal matter also contains a good deal of unused energy that can "re-digested". The fecal matter from a town can be used to power all the electrical needs of the town.

Funny. Town send. Lots of fecal matter.

Lots of BS about who said what and what imaginary characters play out. (ie. Fruitbat is actually Steve Clarke)
If you examine the BS, you see what systems are using the energy. And what is in the BS is quite fascinating.

Personally, I prefer to use very limited time examining fecal matter. To some degree, observation of what is exiting your body is important. (too much corn, undigested). I can look/smell and determine that I may need to change what I input, according to what is arrives on the backside.

Fecal matter is the "resultant". A reactionary to an action taken.
There is lots of BS surrounding "alternative science".
And I have spent some time observing the BS.
Pretty sure I don't need to examine the BS any further. Nor do I chose to step into the fecal matter. Too messy.

As this a forum about T. Townsend Brown, and John Hutchison has mentioned Brown as having influence in the Hutchison work:
I would be willing to discuss what aspects of the Brown technology has been used by Hutchison.

IMO observation is important. Observation absent preconceived notions is imperative.

Nancy

Had never thought about in that sense.

Quite apt. More, quite correct.

That's also, FWIW, why I second it.

"Fruitbat is Steve Clarke".

He could have been John Doe, but in England, there are far more Steve Clarke's.

I've been here for a day, I wonder if Nancy Hutchison has PM'd the admins to expel me yet... :c)

FB.

(Only four more posts to get promotion..

Fruitbat wrote:
I've been here for a day, I wonder if Nancy Hutchison has PM'd the admins to expel me yet... :c)

FB.

(Only four more posts to get promotion..

HA !
For a thread so named, what a Cutting post ! Very adequate.


Hard, patient lessons.
Hopefully, everyone has learned from them ....



PS : Rank and File, that's where I feel at ease.
Promotions are Veils.

LuisP wrote:PS : Rank and File, that's where I feel at ease.
Promotions are Veils.

That's easy for you to say, Mr "Petty Officer 1st Class".
You have rank and status here.
Me I'm still young and keen for recognition!
Just 1 more post now...

FB!

(They really ought to do a tongue-in-cheek smiley)

Fruitbat wrote:"Fruitbat is Steve Clarke".

He could have been John Doe, but in England, there are far more Steve Clarke's.

I've been here for a day, I wonder if Nancy Hutchison has PM'd the admins to expel me yet... :c)

FB.

(Only four more posts to get promotion..

Probably...

No, no one has PM'ed or emailed to have anyone removed.

Mikado

Mikado14 wrote:No, no one has PM'ed or emailed to have anyone removed.

Mikado

Patience, there are PM experts upon here ...
Talking of which I PMd Fred, and have had no reply, is He OK?
I hate PMs as it results in little cliques forming, but in Freds case I will use it.
Kevin

kevin wrote:Patience, there are PM experts upon here ...

Kevin

Cutting through the BS as a hot knife on butter, I also "hate" PM's. For I also believe "it results in little cliques forming".


All communication - save very extreme or deeply personal, and therefore, generally irrelevant, situations - should always be "aired" publicly.
So, as a Rule of Thumb (to me, that is) PM's are not only to be avoided, but if forced to engage in, sacrosanct : its contents are never to be divulged, destined to its Receiver only.

All matters outside of those very strict and exclusive domains, should be addressed publicly. Always.

This is a good sanitary rule.
And I'm extremely hygienic, so no wonder I follow it.

Just to set a record on that .... not that anyone cares, but I do.

PM's do form the foundation for little cliques to form, I agree.

However, I agree with Luis that if one does PM, it is confidential and should remain as such. I have been guilty of posting portions if not all of a PM in the past but it was preceeded by someone referencing the content and twisting what was said. I have done the same with emails and again, after someone else referenced them and said something to the contrary.

In most instances, if you can't say it publicly, then why say it? Then again, somethings should not be said publicly. For instance, if I were ill, I would not post it publicly. If I wished for someone to know, I would PM them or email them...in PRIVATE. I did have the occasion where I told someone something in confidence and it was told to Linda. And me being stupid did so again...with the same person. Won't happen again.

I value being private and I value being open. There is a place for both.

Just my two cents,

Mikado