No Dogs Allowed
Posted: Sun May 04, 2014 12:23 pmI awoke this morning and went to my Inbox and I was inundated with all kinds of posts that Linda....Myles, a Yorkie, appears to be making. Kim went over and was reading these posts after I mentioned it to her as well. Although I didn't go there and read, what I read from my Inbox and what Kim told me, well, I see someone has gone over the precipice.
I originally blocked Linda's IP's in the hope that she would not come over to read, reread, re-reread, re-re-read, etc, as she has been doing. The log shows how she continually reads old posts. I believe this is what fuels her zealous posting and reposting of occurrences from years ago. There are times I believe that she may long to go back and redo all that she did so an alternative ending may occur. Perhaps her constant berating of her version of the truth is indicative of what she did wrong and subconsciously, she just can't believe and so the persistent retelling, rehashing, reanalyzing and rewriting of what transpired is cathartic to her.
She has now gone to the point of posting, in her own avatar/login, as a Yorkie dog. Under normal circumstances, a pseudonym is totally acceptable in writing or other areas where anonymity is paramount, for example, Ben Franklin as Poor Richard. However, in this instance, it is more indicative of someone who knows they can't hide their IP but wishes to preserve the perceived image that others have of her by using a nom de plume or alter ego. She learned her lesson well when it came to alter egos with Paul Schatzkin which was the impetus of "epic fail" and on the History Channel as Hog Island and wildcard. A situation that she created and refuses take responsibility for her actions.
There may be many things that have occurred back and forth but this is too much and too far. To post under her login as someone identified as a Yorkie is just unbelievable. Individuals are indulging her or would that be indulging a Yorkie? In any event, those that continue to interact with those posts are no better than the sickness exhibited. They fuel it. As the kids in school who encourage the class clown. In reality, the class clown only performs to build their self-esteem in the eyes of their peers and those doing the encouraging are only boosting their own egos to feel superior by poking fun at someone who has low self-esteem. Who is more of a poor person?
One could look at this with a humorous side if it were done just as such but an entire, from what was sent to me, scenario of Linda going on vacation and while she was gone, her dog would be posting...really? Quite creative I might add but at the same time, it is being presented in a such a manner as to be the truth and not being done with tongue in cheek. Seriously, a dog...at a keyboard....making posts? I would think something such as this would be better suited for America's Got Talent or some other such venue. But it is being used as a vehicle to raise the same old repetitive cry that has been emanating from deep within the psyche of Linda for three years.
This is fraud in the manner being presented and those that partake in it are like the students who encourage the class clown. May you feel superior to someone who needs real help.
From what I have seen in the emails and what Kim has mentioned, I appear to be the main topic in her cutting and pasting with referencing the Hut. Her asking other members for their feelings in regard to me is nothing more than to appease her actions, present and past, in the hope that others will agree with her rewrite and interpretations of truth, even though none of those were present or partook in the incidences discussed.
I will be banning her IP's again. Perhaps by not easily coming here, she will be less inclined to jump the precipice and there will not be those who will be behind her in helping to push.
Mikado
I originally blocked Linda's IP's in the hope that she would not come over to read, reread, re-reread, re-re-read, etc, as she has been doing. The log shows how she continually reads old posts. I believe this is what fuels her zealous posting and reposting of occurrences from years ago. There are times I believe that she may long to go back and redo all that she did so an alternative ending may occur. Perhaps her constant berating of her version of the truth is indicative of what she did wrong and subconsciously, she just can't believe and so the persistent retelling, rehashing, reanalyzing and rewriting of what transpired is cathartic to her.
She has now gone to the point of posting, in her own avatar/login, as a Yorkie dog. Under normal circumstances, a pseudonym is totally acceptable in writing or other areas where anonymity is paramount, for example, Ben Franklin as Poor Richard. However, in this instance, it is more indicative of someone who knows they can't hide their IP but wishes to preserve the perceived image that others have of her by using a nom de plume or alter ego. She learned her lesson well when it came to alter egos with Paul Schatzkin which was the impetus of "epic fail" and on the History Channel as Hog Island and wildcard. A situation that she created and refuses take responsibility for her actions.
There may be many things that have occurred back and forth but this is too much and too far. To post under her login as someone identified as a Yorkie is just unbelievable. Individuals are indulging her or would that be indulging a Yorkie? In any event, those that continue to interact with those posts are no better than the sickness exhibited. They fuel it. As the kids in school who encourage the class clown. In reality, the class clown only performs to build their self-esteem in the eyes of their peers and those doing the encouraging are only boosting their own egos to feel superior by poking fun at someone who has low self-esteem. Who is more of a poor person?
One could look at this with a humorous side if it were done just as such but an entire, from what was sent to me, scenario of Linda going on vacation and while she was gone, her dog would be posting...really? Quite creative I might add but at the same time, it is being presented in a such a manner as to be the truth and not being done with tongue in cheek. Seriously, a dog...at a keyboard....making posts? I would think something such as this would be better suited for America's Got Talent or some other such venue. But it is being used as a vehicle to raise the same old repetitive cry that has been emanating from deep within the psyche of Linda for three years.
This is fraud in the manner being presented and those that partake in it are like the students who encourage the class clown. May you feel superior to someone who needs real help.
From what I have seen in the emails and what Kim has mentioned, I appear to be the main topic in her cutting and pasting with referencing the Hut. Her asking other members for their feelings in regard to me is nothing more than to appease her actions, present and past, in the hope that others will agree with her rewrite and interpretations of truth, even though none of those were present or partook in the incidences discussed.
I will be banning her IP's again. Perhaps by not easily coming here, she will be less inclined to jump the precipice and there will not be those who will be behind her in helping to push.
Mikado