Mikado14 wrote:Nancy_Hutchison wrote:Mikado,
The thread I linked to is one that I posted at the life ray work site.
Basic info, so you and others have a foundation from which to converse.
Apparently you have not read the entire thread, nor have you read what I linked within the thread.
I sent you, Fruitbat and Playswithmachines a recent email. More details, and an invitation to participate in building the mobile units and deploying. This email was also sent to over 100 other individuals who have expressed an interest in assisting once we had accomplished a successful mobile unit.
I really don't care what Linda Brown says, thinks or does. Fruitbat may have some brains left--at least he has concern about the radioactive contamination.
Nancy
Apparently Nancy, you have not read any of my posts or emails either. I have read the thread in question and the links. My post was in regard to a link to a you tube video that was just recently posted.
My response was in regard to your recent results as to your field tests....NOT old threads with links that I have read not once but twice. Reading those threads and links seems to be a common response from anyone within your group when someone asks a question.
You will find that when someone offers to help, they are more conducive to help when they are not treated as idiots or spies for non-existing entities.
Please don't be so...condescending.
Mikado
Mikado,
SOUND creates this physical realm.
LAW is the relationship of one thing to another.
We have (limited) ways to observe the LAW of SOUND.
such as an oscilloscope...a microscope...or a professional audio program on the computer..our own senses (seeing, hearing, etc.)
In the thread at liferaygroup.com, I put a link to the book called 'The Alchemy of Rainbow Heart Music"
Stoni posted further information on the site, of the "heart form" that is observed when sound creates matter.
Also on the SOUND thread, I spoke about cymatics.
This entire physical realm is cymatics, the result of sound, moving in and out (millions of times per second), of the "everything".
Simple illustration: light is sound, frequencies
you see color when light reacts with an object
the sound (light frequencies) absorbs into the object
EXCEPT for the color that you see
the cup that you perceive as red, is all colors, except for red
MoreCool4U was the first to point out this explanation about light...bright spark that he is.
John Hutchison has observed nature for over half a century. The relationship of one thing to another.
He used radio receivers to observe sound. Listened to the static. Static told him when "something was happening".
Many decades ago, while he was listening to the static as he was creating radio waves, and observing the relationship of wave patterns combined/played against another, he heard something new in the static. The spark gaps with high voltage he was looking at, formed a flower pattern when the new static appeared. And the objects in the room levitated.
John also, by observing the static, found how to get information into the subatomic level and to transmutate matter.
Now, decades later, John has refined his subatomic communications. He knows the path, the correct combinations of sound, and is using this path to give information to radioactive elements. Information to allow the radioactive elements to rapidly become what it is they so desperately want -- rest.
Can this technology be abused? Absolutely.
Has someone else figure out this path? Probably. The way to do it has been written in the ancient human documents and available for thousands of years.
Can someone use one of the mobile units to destroy matter? Nope. The recording in the unit is a complex signal that contains the path and the information. No way to separate the two. Can only be used to restore, not to destroy.
People always hound John and want to know the "secret to anti-gravity". There is no secret.
The information has been left for us my ancient humans. All right there, smack dab in our faces.
Read The Alchemy of Rainbow Heart Music. The Essene documents. Observe Celtic patterns. Dig into hieroglyphics.
Its all information left for us.
IMO, the Philadelphia Experiment was humans messing with sound, and they goofed up. The didn't read all the documents that I linked in the SOUND thread. They were like five-year old children who had discovered automatic machine guns and decided to start shooting.
Reading, understanding and discussing the information on SOUND gives us a foundation upon which to build knowledge.
I'm not going to give a group of five year old children a pile of automatic machine guns.
We have continually done controlled experiments concerning John's technology. Have been doing this for years.
For the first time ever, a mobile unit containing the recorded RF signal has been tested offsite.
Controlled testing with a radioactive sample in fixed position, Geiger counter in fixed position. Computer tracking the results.
The results are staggering.
I could publish those results, but no one would believe me.
So we are letting a university do a repeat of the testing, and they can take the insults instead of me.
We are not looking for funding. We are not looking to create a product for sale.
We know this works. And the vast majority of the people who got that email I sent to you, Luke and Fruitbat (blind copied) are people who have been "with us" for years. Many are scientists who have personally evaluated John's technology. They already know John's work is legitimate.
You, Luke and Fruitbat. You don't know.
I have given you guys the opportunity to learn. And to participate.
If you define what I tell you as condescending, then that is your problem. Not mine.
BTW-- IMO Linda Brown has attempted to damage both of us. I have spent some time reading on this forum, trying to understand why she is so hostile.
Haven't found any answers. She did give me one clue, at the beginning of our conversations. Her father with a "fan amplifier" -- something like an ionic breeze--playing the "Sound of Music" every day at noon. Important clue. Then all hell broke lose and communication with her spin down a rabbit hole.
Nancy
