LuisP wrote:Nancy, from where I stand, is essentialy correct regarding those who will do "nothing but criticizing what John and I are doing."
Yes, may they rot in hell.
I too said so last September, and haven't changed my mind.
That is because John and Nancy provide more amounts of BS than most people who have zero scientific credibility. Which of course is ironic given that Nancy started this thread.
Having a tech. agnostic mind is at least an open mind!!!! Data and evidence is the only thing that matters not the beliefs or ramblings of how much radiation is in the Pacific, They do not have any empirical proof and the plant stuff is another classic example of the blind leading the blind based on half baked and crazy ramblings of a narcissist (self confessed at that).
I myself studied Botany as part of my Agricultural studies and I am just to busy to even be bothered to go there given that the claimant has not provided all the relevant information and control is absent,
The shear level of your unswerving belief system Luis is admirable for its loyalty but I predict you may get quite upset when you realise just how mistaken you have been to place your trust in that bunch of 'entertainers'.
On the issue of superconductors in the human spine yet again ignorance reigns. On evolution we have all evolved from a common ancestor and all species are in permanent transition. Indeed a question posed to me was name a transitional species well I should really have said 'ALL' but of course that would not helped demonstrate how evolution is a fact for all intensive purposes.
When you decide to enter the realm of science, being cavalier with data and poo pooing the method because it excludes you is just tough live with it. Does it mean your idea is wrong? of course not but it means you have not proved it! I watched and listened painfully to Hobbit vs FB et al and never got to involved as it was futile to bother.
here is a saying that is apt here:-
"It is futile to remain wise when you are surrounded by fools."
So lets cut through the BS,
Is there a problem with radiation from Japan?
Probably
Do the Hutchisons practice science?
NO.
Do they have a theory?
Maybe, but there is a probability that it is a false claim because they are pathological liars, and they might not know themselves, or it is deliberate sociopathic / narcissistic behaviour.
Do you believe them.....
Personally I do not, it is up to each person to decide for themselves.