I'd like to clarify some points about the recent posts I made and the responses to them. If for no other reason than to point out that I am NOT a scientist, and I possess no advance degrees. I am a student of many disciplines, and as such, I am always learning new things.
My views are such that what we call MASS is only energy that is ordered into a particular pattern or resonance. We all all of the same energies, all life, all matter, all energy, is all the same. And so my quest is to learn and understand the unification of all, without the religious or scientific dogma to cloud my judgement or distract me from the truth.
Are facts the same as truth?
It is a fact that Einstein was really troubled by the results published by Dayton Miller, as Miller's work (and his degrees, experience, and skills) determined that Michelson-Morley data was not true to the facts! Einstein felt that Miller's extensive data destroyed the relativity theories, and especially the idea that gravity was a 'warping of space-time' and opened up the possibility of a new understanding of the physical universe.
Many have attempted to understand the significance of this work, and my feelings is they fail not because Miller is not understood, but because the current 'laws' and theories cannot be used to examine something for which they were never inclusive of. Does that make sense?
My suggestion to all those who choose to wander down this 'rabbit hole' is to obtain James Clerk Maxwell: A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism in its original form, as there must be more to his quaternion mathematics in regards to Aether Science.