Nancy_Hutchison wrote:Mikado,
Did you build and test the circuit?
Do I need to post the email that was sent to you (and others in the core group), explaining the steps of building the circuit, testing the circuit, then testing the circuit with the first prototype?
it was the email I sent when all the back and forth was going on with you and stoni.
I'll do this one more time. The only circuit I was asked to build was a schematic for a "negative sawtooth" (really a negative ramp) generator. There was NOTHING else in any email. I have explained this, I have identified the circuit as being identical to one in the National Semiconductor reference manual and still you don't seem to comprehend what I say. If you wish to call the 555 circuit a prototype, okay, but it is NOT or was not anything special. If you are referencing something else, I didn't see it or get.
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:quite possible that I am wrong,
but it is my understanding that you had difficulty in building the circuit....so there was no reason to send you a prototype to test the circuit with. .... you built the circuit and did not understand how it functioned..."D1 and V1", and the wave form was not as expected, it was truncated.
my apologies if I am wrong.
I did NOT have any difficulty in building a 555 timer circuit. The difficulty was in answering my questions in regard to what the hell testing was being done. Just building the generator was only verifying that ...."yes, it does generate the required frequency". Now, why would I build a circuit that is already proven to do what is wanted? I was under the impression that what was "wanted" by the use of the word "verify" was to test for a certain set of parameters. Those parameters would ...or should have...included output impedance test for loading. NO ONE could answer that question. The only thing stated was that they wanted to know that someone else could build the circuit and that it would generate...that was the final conclusion...that, I found to be ridiculous. It was described that they wanted to know if anyone could build the circuit and make it work. Wouldn't it have been more effective to test such a theory on someone who is not an engineer? By the way, it was a thread that Johnny Blade put up.
Apology accepted.
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:I brought you into discussions with the core group. Asked you to get up to speed by reading everything...everything that had been posted on the website. IMO, you either did not read everything, or you did read everything and did not understand what you read.
And you are entitled to your opinion. I did read what was available to the public. You had a "hidden" section that I was not allowed to see. You seem to forget that. Now, as to emails, yes, I was "cc'd" but then there were gaps, quite significant gaps that came to bear when someone included me at a later date in the chain. Let me tell you this, if someone is to be included, when one replies to an email, they need to select "reply all".
access to the site wrote:----- Original Message -----
From: Ben Zene
To: kim_c58
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Not being apathetic.
I recently finished the admin on the website. You have access to all areas
except "Private".
Welcome.
Ben
In the above email, it specifically states that I did not have access to the "private" area, only the public. Membership only afforded the ability to post. From what I was told by someone, all of what you are referencing was in the "private" section. And that source was reliable and stated that they and Ben wanted me to have access but stoni didn't want me to. How can one help when one does not have all the info?
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:propagation of a multi-band RF signal
do you understand how a tree transmits?
and what do you think the "ray guns" are?...they are sophisticated antennas used for the multi-band RF signal
we already propagate a multi-band RF signal.
truly, all life on this planet propagates multi-band RF signals
really basic stuff,
gotta learn how to dance, Mikado
Therefore, you are now saying that the "ray gun" is a multi-band antenna. Then why were you interested in a UHF (actually it was EHF)repeater at one time? If that is the case, and the frequencies you have mentioned, the ray gun is emitting microwave energy. Have you heard about birds dying from the microwave energy on towers?...what about people?
You throw out technical terms without the bat of an eye. Did you know that what you are talking about are the same microwaves in a microwave oven except higher? And when I asked about the power output of the ray gun it was....deer in the headlight response.
Repeat......I understand about the tree, Brown wrote about it and I have seen it do so, a pine specifically. And I am not stupid, I understand what the ray gun is from your description but I had questions that were never quite answered.
Do you remember all the talk about the "complex RF signal" in other places? Here, refresh your memory if you read it, if not, here is where I discussed it:
viewtopic.php?p=31938#p31938Nancy_Hutchison wrote:lullaby to a baby
apparently something you have never done, because you are having a difficult time understanding the "technical" aspect, the "mechanics" of what happens when you sing a lullaby to a baby. The human body is a sender and receiver of electromagnetic energy. This was proven back in the 1970s. There is an exchange of energy, modification of resultant waves (sound) when you interact with a crying baby. Such a simple, perfect example. Too bad you cannot see it.
And a plumber attempting to metaphor to brain surgery.
...my sister is a surgeon, and she does her own plumbing. Funny that you brought it up, since we have actually had this very conversation. A plumbing metaphor is perfect for explaining brain surgery.
Alchemy of Rainbow Heart Music.
No, I am not Moose Dung. However, I have spoken to him on the phone.
you ask.."you really think that one can reduce over 600 pages in simple words that Linda could or would even attempt to understand as feasible?" I didn't ask you to do this.
I asked for your "Cliff Notes", expected more than one line.
Hopefully I have addressed all your questions/comments in this response.
If not, please point out what I have missed.
Nancy
I have raised two daughters, I know what it is to sing to them. But remember this, sound will also wake them and cause them to be irritable. As for anything else, I am not going to attempt to condense 600 plus pages into a defining synopsis which in the end, the very nature of the book, would require a good many pages that at the very least would be 10% or 60 pages. Youe asking to do so is in line with other things you ask, a callous disregard of the time and energy required and when someone does offer to do so, the hand is bitten.
BTW, it was done prior to the 70's, at least the foundation of all you are talking about well over 100 years...or more.
As to the one line response in regard to the book, I felt it was quite apropos. I apologize that you cannot see that. Perhaps you should reread it.
Nancy_Hutchison wrote:BTW--the WDX and circuit have been removed from the website. We are not using this device. Learned from the WDX experience that the signal could be recorded, but the signal was unstable (only recorded on a few of the WDX, and of the ones that did record, signal lost in transport). The WDX is not the mobile device we have successfully tested with radioactive samples offsite. The current successful device uses magnetite and the RF is recorded inside a magnetic field. It is very similar to the Hutchison Power Cell.
So, are you saying the "complex RF signal" was too complex...or....in technical terms, the circuit required to perform and output the required signal was too unpredictable and sensitive that it was deemed ineffective and too unstable for others (none technical) to operate? Just curious.
Best as always,
Mikado
BTW, Moose Dung is a "he" that goes by the name of "Mary"?