Nancy_Hutchison wrote:wags,
John has not produced his own "scientific report"
but dozens of other "accredited scientists" have written about the technology
you said, "John simply is not important or respectable enough to ignore the established setup. He has produced no papers and sadly that is all that counts in that world."
here is where you and I part on the road
the world...this Earth
sees and knows what John and I DO
and "that is all that counts in the world".
we don't care what any "human" believes
we care that we are doing what needs to be done
I knew nothing about John Hutchison when John and I first began to communicate.
(a former boyfriend of mine wanted me to contact him to do a TV show)
After I spoke with John that first day, I did many internet searches. Read the "good and bad".
Then John came to my home and we worked for a year on building crystal power cells.
No lab, just lots of scavenged stuff.
During the BP oil disaster, I went to his lab in Canada with a pick up truck and trailer.
The plan was to help him sell off equipment, and then he would take back to Minnesota what he wanted to keep.
While I was at his place in Canada, someone sent us polluted water samples from the Gulf of Mexico, complete with tar balls.
I knew John could build crystal power cells, but frankly, I had my skepticism about his "other abilities".
So I set up the protocols for testing. I recorded in hi-def video the process and results.
And I arranged to have the water samples tested (both before and after going to the Gulf of Mexico).
I have many terabytes of video evidence, numerous tests...and notebooks full of the procedures and results.
and the independent lab tests
Do John or I care if the rest of the people in this world "give us credit for what we have done"?
no.
and the time and energy that it would take me to write the report (book) is too great.
There is much we still need to do.
And I do what I do, because I have done the testing, I have seen the results, and I have gotten the reports from the independent labs.
I needed to do all these things...to convince myself.
Convince myself that "John is real."
Yes, I have read reams of papers of what other scientists of said, but all that means zero.
I had to see, test and confirm...myself.
So I MOVED, took action with the first hand knowledge and results that I personally recorded.
Earth...life on Earth...our home
could not wait for me to write a report and try to convince others that "John is real".
You may believe that my choice of action (instead of writing a report, data, evidence) was a "fatal mistake".
You may think that I could have gotten more "support" if I documented that I had "followed the 13 rules" .
But I learned, very early on our relationship, to follow "John's rules of flow".
I am always in the background, documenting, testing, verifying....for ME...to be certain I do not take a misstep.
However my primary function is to follow John.
John "points". Then I am like a dog, sniffing for the trail...bringing him a bone and asking if I found the right bone.
That is how the mobile anti-radiation units came to be.
Is there documentation the units work? yes.
Am I going to spend the time writing a report to prove it to others? no.
I'm going to spend my time getting units built and installed.
and improving upon what we already have done
wags,
back on Linda's forum you had become a great thorn in my side
I felt as if you, Linda and Steve Clarke were a team of bullies, beating the crap out of me.
my hope is that on this forum
you can acknowledge that I have made my choices for the actions I have
I accept that my actions don't "follow your rules"
please do not try to force me to follow your rules
and maybe
one day
you will understand the "rules of flow"
you will one day
find peace
Nancy
I appreciate that honest view Nancy, and can fully appreciate the feelings you have had. For my part it was not my intention to 'bully' you but have a rigorous debate.
It was not my intention to force you to do anything but to appreciate why the established world was a problem. I do not really have anything invested either way, I am a true sceptic, I may doubt your science but not your effort or belief.
For me data and evidence is what matters that is my 'conditioning' maybe but I find it a good place to be. As for Steve, he believed in you a great deal at the start and called me after your interaction with him. Linda is another matter as my opinion as to her intentions are not clear. All our interactions have all been soured and maybe we need to forgive each other for hurting one another. As Yesterday illustrated sometimes the catalyst for conflict is hidden.
On one point though I am alarmed and that is the Captain and the County. That does concern me more than the rest oddly. I do hope you can see things from his position and find an amicable solution.
Best regards
Wags
