Mikado14 wrote:Wags,
She appears to be guilty of what she accuses others.
If Nancy would have said that John's father was of the Order of the Knights Templar than it would have not warranted a response as what I gave and I would not have made it but would have understood exactly what she was talking about.
Her statement was as conclusive as mine. Or one could say it was stated as such to incite a response as mine knowing full well that the "Knights Templar" do not exist in the capacity in which the name implies.
Mikado
Mikado,
John speaks in sentences, which if I am lucky, are three or four words in length.
(If you hear him on TV or radio, it is not spontaneous conversation, he has a "script of responses" that he uses).
I gave the information that he spoke to me.
Also, I did quite a bit of research into "Knights Templar". I disagree with your statement, "Knights Templar do not exist in the capacity in which the name implies."
Again, you are making an assumption and conclusion that "Knights Templar" do not exist.
And...how would you know "the capacity" in which the words John used implied?
In no way, whatsoever, did I make my statement to "incite a response from you."
And it is for this reason, that assumptions are made instead of inquiries and a true desire for exchange of information
....that I had originally wanted this to be a private discussion between Kevin and myself.
You are derailing this thread.
Would you please try to understand what I am trying to accomplish here?
If you do not agree with a statement made, such as "John's father was Knights Templar", then please ASK what I mean by that, instead of attacking the words that I wrote.
Nancy