Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

[LuisP]

Canonically, dogs do not have souls. But I rather suspect that since He is in “every things”, they might have one, yes. As Cats and Roses might, too. Uncanonically speaking (ahem) that is.

As to my “wonderings”, well, pretty simple:
“I cannot at the moment” …. “I will remain silent on that” …. “on a very tight leash”

Food enough for “wondering”, wouldn’t your PostPositivist, Kantian mind, also think ?

But what the hell, maybe it’s just me and my lack of True Knowledge.



Your move, pal.

[wags]

Canonically, dogs do not have souls. But I rather suspect that since He is in “every things”, they might have one, yes. As Cats and Roses might, too. Uncanonically speaking (ahem) that is.

As to my “wonderings”, well, pretty simple:
“I cannot at the moment” …. “I will remain silent on that” …. “on a very tight leash”

Food enough for “wondering”, wouldn’t your PostPositivist, Kantian mind, also think ?

But what the hell, maybe it’s just me and my lack of True Knowledge.

Your move, pal.

Evil persists when good men do nothing....

Silent is sometimes speaks louder...

[LuisP]

Evil persists when good men do nothing....

Silent is sometimes speaks louder...

"I believe it was Rousseau who said ‘it is a sort of folly to remain wise amidst those who are mad"

Your signature, is it not, Wags ?

So,
Reasonably expected to be by others - surely, by me - understood as representing your "Essence", your Truth to Self.



You're not following it.
Meaning, what are you up to ?


Check .

[wags]

Evil persists when good men do nothing....

Silent is sometimes speaks louder...

"I believe it was Rousseau who said ‘it is a sort of folly to remain wise amidst those who are mad"

Your signature, is it not, Wags ?

So,
Reasonably expected to be by others - surely, by me - understood as representing your "Essence", your Truth to Self.

You're not following it.
Meaning, what are you up to ?

Check .

Good try but I think I can see the flaw to your seemingly floorless logic.

The tag line is an aide memoir for me rather than an essence. I tend to use the signature line as a an extra function (for example I had the JK Bookmarks and Work Editor hyperlink on the Token.

As to what I am up to well making a contribution in my own unique way that may be considered either wise or mad. That is not for me to judge now is it.

I write this intuitively which is ironic really, But people always come before any cherished views I have. I am pretty unconcerned as to if I am agreed with or not, I may even change my mind if I am presented with a good case.

[Mikado14]

Nice to see you have posted Kevin.

You must have a beeter computer than moi, as You are online on various forums at the same time?
I will sort of quote You.
"Yes XX certainly writes the most memorable ones"
You wrote "FB"
Over the years little boy blue would recieve that same message from Me, He has had multiple personas.....multiple.

Kevin

Left logged in and multiple sessions Kevin. There is only one actual 'Wags' and I certainly remember your one liner about me. Forgive if I get this wrong but it made me laugh.

Mikado is Wags on steroids! (or was it the other way round?)

Wags

That was rose that made that statement.

Mikado

[wags]

Nice to see you have posted Kevin.

You must have a beeter computer than moi, as You are online on various forums at the same time?
I will sort of quote You.
"Yes XX certainly writes the most memorable ones"
You wrote "FB"
Over the years little boy blue would recieve that same message from Me, He has had multiple personas.....multiple.

Kevin

Left logged in and multiple sessions Kevin. There is only one actual 'Wags' and I certainly remember your one liner about me. Forgive if I get this wrong but it made me laugh.

Mikado is Wags on steroids! (or was it the other way round?)

Wags

That was rose that made that statement.

Mikado

Apologies to Rose.
Better information I change my mind (Check Luis?)

[LuisP]

".... people always come before any cherished views I have. I am pretty unconcerned as to if I am agreed with or not, I may even change my mind if I am presented with a good case.

Nice counter strike.
Expected nothing else.


I'd say my "floorless logic" points to you being "presented with a good case". Enough to nag and trouble.

From equally good views of the board.


That must be Hell, I'd also say.
Because yes, to me - if I may - you have a "unique way" of "contributing". Which is neither fantasist or lying. Partisan or Indulging.

But simply "functional", so neither wise or mad.


You're in a lot of trouble !
I say this intuitively.



No Check, Wags. You now have "better information".
I'm thinking.


But I'll get there, I hope.

[Fruitbat]

Spark up a big one, it's TRIAL TIME.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE2t6HWmquc

FB.

[re-rose]

Are you calling Wags a bot, Kev?

"Yes XX certainly writes the most memorable ones"
You wrote "FB"
Over the years little boy blue would recieve that same message from Me,

Unless you sent them telepathically?

rose, bored enough to stir Forum Pots.

PS Batty. I'll wait for the post trial reports, if you don't mind,

[kevin]

Are you calling Wags a bot, Kev?

"Yes XX certainly writes the most memorable ones"
You wrote "FB"
Over the years little boy blue would recieve that same message from Me,

Unless you sent them telepathically?

rose, bored enough to stir Forum Pots.

PS Batty. I'll wait for the post trial reports, if you don't mind,

Rose,
I am not calling wags anything, others have multiple coats of many colours.
You , as ever, are wonderfull.

kevin