Steve Clarke has JUDGED you all!

[FM No Static At All]

Seeing so much self mortification, exemptions and ex culpas while making the Other the fountain of all Wrong, and by it the Excuse of Self stupidity and responsability ....

Well, it too turns my stomach.

There is none of being offered here. We are all accountable for our actions and take full responsibility for the consequences. If you weren't there you just don't really know, so your analysis is irrelevant.

The whole point is simply to stop feeding the beast and move on.

[DavidG]

The food bowl has been lifted and emptied here....onward, with good lessons in hand...wags may see things happening the way he does, that's ok, all perceive that which is in their view as the see it, no harm no foul.

I for one am hoping Pladuim can make some sort of headway with that odd device he was given, and work on my own understanding of TT Brwons work, not to build his devices or complete his designs, but to find a useful segment of his thinking,not bolster my own understanding of the universe and it's strange forces and effects.

I think reading his patents can be very rewarding, and that there are certainly hidden Easter eggs in there, we can all benefit from in our own way.

His family means naught to me now, as non of them likely had anything to share in the first place...hell, he was never around anyways to share it with them from what I've read in Paul's book.

What is the connection between electricity and gravity, and how do we define the wo?

One cannot find links between things, that themselves are not fully understood in all areas...scientific, spiritual, and physical.

[LuisP]

The whole point is simply to stop feeding the beast and move on.

Alleluia !

The food bowl has been lifted and emptied here....onward, with good lessons in hand

Alleluia !

[LuisP]

It is a (undeserved) privilege for me to be a witness to "transmutation" ....



Thank You.

[Mikado14]

Here is a judgment from Steve Clarke

"He is also credited with heterodyning which enables the same antenna to be used for transmission and receiving thus eliminating interference of the transmitted signal to the received signal"

- is crap.

Heterodyning is the mixing of one signal with another to produce sidebands, which can be used to reduce in interference and increase selectivity if one uses mathematics and filters. It's got owt to do with antennna. You can only use the same transmitter for transmitting and receiving if you disconnect the input RF preamplifier during transmitting.

Somebody, is pretending an understanding of radio which they do not actually have...

FB.

This is a prime example of a little bit of knowledge being dangerous or in this case, making a fool out of oneself.

Heterodyning is the mixing of two signals to produce four signals. F1 and F2 being the two base signals and then F1 + F2 (the sum of the two) and then F1 - F2 (the difference of the two).

The key statement ignored by FB is:

"... the same antenna to be used for transmission and receiving thus eliminating interference(emphasis added) of the transmitted signal to the received signal."

In the early days of radio transmission, the transmitted signal was essentially a spark discharge and was a broad em spectrum transmission. When Fessenden developed heterodyning, it enabled the ability for the receiver to utilize the same antenna for receiving since it would take the received signal and change it into a new frequency (the difference) which became the IF frequency in the receiver. However, it was not utilized for sometime until constant carrier modulated transmission were adopted. (This is general information for there were many different methods employed in the first 20 years of this century)

Now nowhere in the original statement was it meant to convey a complex technical explanation, however, FB attempts to grandstand some knowledge that he has only an introductory level as indicated by the following statement:

"Heterodyning is the mixing of one signal with another to produce sidebands,"

As stated above, heterodyning does NOT produce sidebands, sidebands are a product of modulation with a carrier wave.

To sum this all up I will use a quote from someone:

"Somebody, is pretending an understanding of radio which they do not actually have..."

Mikado

PS: FB, I am sure you will read this with masked IP and Java turned off which only exemplifies the paranoia you exhibit most of the time. Say what you have over on the token for I will not rebut you anymore........Mikado has now judged you and found you lacking a backbone....or foundational knowledge.

[wags]

Is this relevant (Heterodyning) and a decent source on the subject.

https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve ... yning.html

{Library Item}

[Mikado14]

Is this relevant (Heterodyning) and a decent source on the subject.

https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve ... yning.html

{Library Item}

Yes, it is relevant for it is a good description. Here is a link to Fessenden:

http://inventors.about.com/library/inve ... senden.htm

If you read it, you will see that not only is he credited as developing what is known as Heterodyning, his company is also credited with the modulation of a carrier wave.

Further from Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterodyne

"So the output contains sinusoidal terms with frequencies at the sum ω1 + ω2 and difference ω1 - ω2 of the two original frequencies. It also contains terms at the original frequencies and at multiples of the original frequencies 2ω1, 2ω2, 3ω1, 3ω2, etc.; the latter are called harmonics, as well as more complicated terms at frequencies of Mω1 + Nω2, called intermodulation products. These unwanted frequencies, along with the unwanted heterodyne frequency, must be filtered out of the mixer output by an electronic filter to leave the desired heterodyne."

Notice the part about harmonics. As you can see, it mentions the sum, the difference and the original frequencies.

Since sidebands were mentioned by someone else as being a result of heterodyning, here is what Wiki says: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sideband

"In radio communications, a sideband is a band of frequencies higher than or lower than the carrier frequency, containing power as a result of the modulation process."

I hope this helps but then, anyone can do a Wiki or Google and should be used to prevent hoof and mouth disease.

Mikado

[wags]

A Science Abstract on Heterodyning
http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/v ... t=eeng_fac

[Mikado14]

Noticed this post from Linda:

http://www.cosmic-token.com/forum/viewt ... 333#p30333

Some fellow by the name of "Bob" has asked me to be a friend over on the Avalon Forum. I don't know any Bob... I don't know what all that entails.... Cat has already checked in with me offering advice.

I think this is already getting too complicated.

Linda

And a week ago in this thread, cat commented:

<snip>So, Steve told Linda that he's not happy about my removal from the Token. Very nice of you Steve. Thank you. Linda's response would have me rolling on the floor laughing, except that would be extremely painful and it's against doctor's orders.<snip>

I was under the impression that cat and Linda were not talking which I was led to believe. So why would Linda be taking advice from cat?

Cat, why do you let her implicate you in this manner? Does anyone else see the dichotomy that is presented? Linda chases cat off the Token but yet implies a close relationship whereas cat offers advice to her.

This is just a casual observation but one I felt the need to point out to reinforce the fact that Linda will on one hand criticize/belittle/ostracize and then praise/claim friendship or a working relationship. Case in point is how on one hand she goes after Paul as a dog chews a bone and then give accolades for his work.

And then we have the case of kevin. The appearance of Myles the dog to renew the banter against myself and anyone else Linda had/has a perceived problem or issue with. In true fashion, Myles was created to be a front to instigate a situation with kevin and knowing that kevin will always state his mind it almost appears as if it were planned via fruitbat's persistent pressuring of Linda to get rid of him. Apparently...mission accomplished. And now Linda is giving nice comments to kevin and stating that he will always be the navigator....and then criticizes him for being here on the Hut and posting.

I recently asked a friend who is well known to Linda about how he would define a certain action she is prone in doing. Has anyone ever noticed that when Linda is asked a question, she returns with a question? And when a person does not answer a question she has asked then it is interpreted as a slight upon her or as in most cases, the lack of the response is then interpreted in a manner that is used to substantiate a wild ass claim she is making?

His response to me was that what she is doing can be referred to as structural deception and in the second case from above it can be characterized as structured self-deception.

I suppose I am revisiting this out of boredom at the present and she has asked a question of me whereas I told her to either email the question or ask it respectfully. Of course she didn't and in my ignorant interpretation I look at it as delusion of grandeur coupled with a feeling of self-importance.

Mikado

[wags]

Mikado,

No point trying to use reason and rational thinking, I have noticed one trait, the inability to judge any scientific or so called agenda. Case in point: The man who allegedly created a fusion reactor and listening to him for twenty seconds or less that he was paranoid and delusional.

On another note the concept of rationing electricity by government... That is totally foolish, and anyone who proposes iy deserves to be given a box of matches and no electricity at all. Electric usage is so variable that it is impractical and would stagnate economic and technological progress.

Lay off the big brother answer they are incapable of running anything. Micro Electricity generation is a good answer, but use private sector to do it.