Beginners Electromagnetism Class

This forum is intended to be a place where complex science is made simple and understandable.

Re: Beginners Electromagnetism Class

Postby htmagic » Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:29 am

Karen,

Don't be afraid to ask questions. There are no dumb questions. Paul is right in that your science teacher should have been paid peanuts. And maybe they were and that was how they reacted. ;)

Jesus was reported as walking through walls. The upper room where His disciples were meeting was locked. They were meeting in fear after Jesus' death. But Jesus appeared amongst them. I don't think he picked the lock. Also, the story of the Philadelphia Experiment (TPX), the men were embedded in the steel bulkhead. When the electric/magnetic/gravitic fields were manipulated, matter passed through matter. Hutchinson's experiments where he fires up a Tesla coil and other electrical devices reportedly hit that "sweet spot" and wood "melts" into metal and becomes embedded. Talk about a way a get a splinter! :lol:

Paul, you've been prolific with your posts again. Another download? Someone needs to write another book!

Later,
MagicBill

Speeding through the Universe, thinking is the best way to travel ...
User avatar
htmagic
The Alchemist
 
Posts: 550
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:17 pm
Location: The Atomic City, Tennessee

Re: Beginners Electromagnetism Class

Postby KarenAnn23 » Fri Jan 15, 2010 11:13 am

What is the basic difference between Ac and Dc ?? Asking about electrical energy or should say current...
KarenAnn23
Cabin Girl
 
Posts: 907
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:48 am

Re: Beginners Electromagnetism Class

Postby htmagic » Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:30 pm

KarenAnn23 wrote:What is the basic difference between Ac and Dc ?? Asking about electrical energy or should say current...

Karen,

Since no one else will answer, I will.
Here is a simple explanation. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/edison/sfeature/acdc.html

And as for frequency, the higher the frequency, the less noticeable the cycle changes. The Europeans use 50 cycle (50 Hz) Alternating current (AC). We use 60 Hz and the military has 400 Hz power. At 400 Hz, there is less ripple (it's a lot finer) and one can get by using smaller transformers. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mains_frequency#400_Hz
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mains_frequency

Now speaking about phase and frequency, I ran across an interesting article.
http://www.world-science.net/othernews/100107_goldenratio wrote:“Golden ratio” hints at hidden atomic symmetry

A hith­er­to un­dis­cov­ered sym­me­try can be found in sol­id mat­ter at very small scales, phys­i­cists are re­port­ing. The sym­me­try, they say, in­volves the gold­en ra­tio fa­mous from art and ar­chi­tec­ture.

Par­t­i­cles at the atom­ic, or quan­tum, scale be­have in un­ex­pected and seem­ingly irra­t­ional ways. New prop­er­ties emerge that stem from an ef­fect known as Hei­sen­berg’s Un­cer­tain­ty Prin­ci­ple.

The re­search­ers in the new study fo­cused on the mag­net­ic ma­te­ri­al co­balt nio­bate. It con­sists of linked mag­net­ic at­oms, which form chains like a very thin ba­r mag­net, but only one at­om wide. They are con­sid­ered a use­ful mod­el for de­scrib­ing mag­netism at ti­ny scales in sol­id state mat­ter.

When a mag­net­ic field is ap­plied to the chain at right an­gles to an aligned “spin” of its par­t­i­cles, the mag­net­ic chain trans­forms in­to a new state called quan­tum crit­i­cal, ac­cord­ing to the phys­i­cists. This can be thought of as a quan­tum ver­sion of a frac­tal pat­tern, a pat­tern that looks the same at any scale.

Such a state is al­so a type of “quan­tum un­cer­tain” or “Schrödinger cat” state, in which cer­tain prop­er­ties of the par­t­i­cles are in­de­ter­mi­nate, said Al­an Ten­nant of the Helm­holtz Cen­ter Ber­lin for Ma­te­ri­als and En­er­gy, one of the re­search­ers.

By tun­ing the sys­tem the re­search­ers found that the chain of at­oms acts like a gui­tar string whose ten­sion comes from in­ter­ac­tion be­tween the spins of the con­stit­u­ent par­t­i­cles. “For these in­ter­ac­tions we found a se­ries,” or “scale,” of “res­o­nant notes,” said Radu Coldea of Ox­ford Uni­vers­ity, who led the re­search.

“The first two notes show a per­fect rela­t­ion­ship with each oth­er,” added Col­dea, prin­ci­ple au­thor of a pa­per on the find­ings to ap­pear in the Jan. 8 is­sue of the re­search jour­nal Sci­ence.

The “pitch” of these notes, or their fre­quen­cies of vibra­t­ion, are in a ra­tio of about 1.618, the same “the gold­en ra­tio fa­mous from art and ar­chi­tec­ture,” he con­tin­ued. If two num­bers are re­lat­ed by the gold­en ra­tio, their sum is al­so re­lat­ed to the larg­er of them by the gold­en ra­tio. In oth­er words, if A di­vid­ed by B is that spe­cial num­ber, then A+B di­vid­ed by A is the same num­ber.

Artists and ar­chi­tects have have used the gold­en ra­tio for cen­turies—for ex­am­ple, rectan­gles 1.618 times high­er than they are wide—be­cause it sup­posedly pro­vides es­thet­ic­ally pleas­ing forms. The gold­en ra­tio is irra­t­ional, like pi, mean­ing its dec­i­mals go on for­ev­er.

In the “quan­tum un­cer­tain” state of mat­ter, the ra­tio “re­flects a beau­ti­ful prop­er­ty of the quan­tum sys­tem – a hid­den sym­me­try,” Col­dea said. It is “ac­tually quite a spe­cial one called E8 by math­e­mati­cians, and this is its first ob­serva­t­ion in a ma­te­ri­al.” The find­ings dra­mat­ic­ally il­lus­trate how math­e­mat­i­cal the­o­ries de­vel­oped for par­t­i­cle phys­ics may find ap­plica­t­ion in sci­ence at the nano­scale—the scale of a few at­oms—and ul­ti­mately in fu­ture tech­nol­o­gy, he added.

“Such dis­cov­er­ies are lead­ing phys­i­cists to spec­u­late that the quan­tum, atom­ic- scale world may have its own un­der­ly­ing or­der,” said Ten­nant. “Si­m­i­lar sur­prises may await re­search­ers in oth­er ma­te­ri­als in the quan­tum crit­i­cal state.”

The re­search­ers reached their re­sults by us­ing a spe­cial probe called neu­tron scat­ter­ing that al­lows phys­i­cists to see the atom­ic-scale vibra­t­ions of a sys­tem. “Us­ing neu­tron scat­ter­ing gives us un­ri­valled in­sight in­to how dif­fer­ent the quan­tum world can be from the every­day,” said re­searcher Elisa Wheel­er, who has worked at both Ox­ford and the Ber­lin cen­ter on the proj­ect.

Now we know Dr. Brown did tests in Hawaii using neutrinos. We also know that he believed in parallel dimensions. As a radar man, he would know about resonance. Now what if he knew about the golden ratio and used it in his studies? Would he have an FTM?

Food for thought...
MagicBill

Speeding through the Universe, thinking is the best way to travel ...
User avatar
htmagic
The Alchemist
 
Posts: 550
Joined: Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:17 pm
Location: The Atomic City, Tennessee

Re: Beginners Electromagnetism Class

Postby kevin » Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:35 pm

htmagic,
That goldenratio link is fantastic, truly wonderfull.
I can follow the consequences in each material, I am atuned to radio fibonacci on Phi and pi.
Thank You for posting that, its like manna from heaven.
kevin
kevin
The Hobbit
 
Posts: 2901
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Beginners Electromagnetism Class

Postby PeeTee » Sat Jan 16, 2010 9:11 pm

kevin wrote:htmagic,
That goldenratio link is fantastic, truly wonderfull.
I can follow the consequences in each material, I am atuned to radio fibonacci on Phi and pi.
Thank You for posting that, its like manna from heaven.
kevin


Ditto

PT
User avatar
PeeTee
The Trickfox
 
Posts: 1479
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:31 am

Re: Beginners Electromagnetism Class

Postby KarenAnn23 » Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:13 pm

woops have you been waiting for me I got it . Majic ment to but your name 1st duh ! thank you
KarenAnn23
Cabin Girl
 
Posts: 907
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:48 am

Re: Beginners Electromagnetism Class

Postby langley » Fri Jan 22, 2010 11:18 am

KarenAnn23 wrote:What is the basic difference between Ac and Dc ?? Asking about electrical energy or should say current...

I deliberately went quiet on this. HT did it much better than me and field effects from DC are not my strong point.

However, yea, as a speaker builder as a hobby, the golden ratio is important in box dimensions. Resonance is important. As frequencies interact power builds and harmonics are generated. And the harmonics are very important.
User avatar
langley
Commander
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:19 am

Re: Beginners Electromagnetism Class

Postby KarenAnn23 » Fri Jan 22, 2010 12:37 pm

It just get more and more complex, doesn't it..

Karen
KarenAnn23
Cabin Girl
 
Posts: 907
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:48 am

Re: Beginners Electromagnetism Class

Postby langley » Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:24 am

KarenAnn23 wrote:It just get more and more complex, doesn't it..

Karen


Like riding a bike I guess. First you have to understand gyroscopes, that's why so many kiddies fall off.

I have to be able to visualise things. And sound frequencies are an analogy for the interaction of frequency generally, no matter where on the spectrum they lie.

So let's bold.

Joseph A. D'Appolito is best known as the developer of the "D'Appolito Configuration" which was first described in his "A Geometric Approach to Eliminating Lobing Error in Multiway Loudspeakers"[1]. This configuration is recognized by loudspeakers which have two midrange or woofer drivers arranged vertically above and below the tweeter[2] and implements the 3-rd order (18dB/octave) crossover allowing the drivers to have similar horizontal dispersion, resulting in absence of any sudden change in directivity with frequency. D'Appolito is the author of "Testing Loudspeakers" and a contributing editor to AudioXpress magazine[3]. He is also the owner of a consulting firm, Audio and Acoustics, Ltd. whose clients include Snell Acoustics; HECO/Recoton, GmbH and Usher Audio Technology[2].

Ok, its not Maxwell. But next time you are in a HiFi shop and you see speakers with an MTM vertical array (Midrange - Tweeter - Midrange) (or W-T-W) in a vertical line on the speaker box, well, if the distance between driver centres is calculated and the cross over circuits are designed correctly, you can say oh OK thats a D'Apolito Array that Joe came up with to avoid lobbing errors in multiway speakers. See the frequencies interact. And Joe's way is accurate.

Course most speakers you see are styled rather than designed so there are copy ones that look like D'Apolito arrays but arent.

Speakers are AC devices. If they were DC the speaker diaphrams would move in or out and stay there. AC allows them to vibrate. And yea, put DC into your speakers and they dont work. They burn out. Cant think of anything else to say about DC. Handy if you want smooth supply of power. Or a constant EM field.



Best to build your own.
User avatar
langley
Commander
 
Posts: 999
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:19 am

Re: Beginners Electromagnetism Class

Postby Linda Brown » Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:09 am

You know that I adore and respect all of you guys and I think that you are all brilliant. But you have not met the class standard here. Karen asked a very simple question. Where is the SIMPLE answer? I know that this excercise may seem a pain but it is important for her and for me too and the resulting conversations might just surprise all of you.

This is the challenge.... the very simplest explanation. Linda
User avatar
Linda Brown
Commander
 
Posts: 6615
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 6:36 am

PreviousNext

Return to Karen's Science Class



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron