Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

No sides to this table. A place where anything goes. Just be polite and leave the hard core vulgarities alone, anyway, the forum won't let you post them.
Forum rules
Act like an adult, no prepubescent children, even if it means an argument but do so with a calm demeanor.

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby Mikado14 » Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:55 pm

Nancy,

You stated, "John's father was Knight's Templar."

I stated, "There are no more Knights Templar."

Your statement in and of itself indicates that the Knights Templar are still alive and well unless John's Father was alive in the 13th century. I feel fairly confident to assume that he wasn't.

Then and therefore, my statement is correct.

There are no more Knights Templar.

Mikado
The thing about Inner Circles is that they are like Boxes - difficult to think outside of them.

"When the Debate is Lost, Slander is the Tool of the Loser" SOCRATES

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Mikado14
Commander
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:38 am
Location: Located where I want to be...or not...depends on the day.

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby wags » Tue Aug 26, 2014 1:57 pm

Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
wags wrote:I do not believe that Mikado had stated he had reached a 'set in stone', finite conclusion mearly stating his understanding and perception of the Universe at that moment in making his reply. In a sense he has done what you requested. But here is an example of linear thinking as you would put it. We and I will place myself there, I prefer 'Rationalist' as opposed to 'Intuitive'. The example I used was to do with using these inherent abilities in all of us, at different times on the same project.

Hope that helps.


Wags,
"There is no more Knights Templar."
is a conclusion
as in,
"There is no more water in the glass"

versus---
"I am not aware of the Knights Templar still being active."
or,
"I am not able to see any water in the glass."

Hope that helps.

Nancy


I present an argument for you to ponder beyond the surface...
Boswell : ‘I have provided you with an argument, but I am not obliged to supply an understanding"
User avatar
wags
Commander
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:46 am
Location: South Saxons Kingdom, Angleland

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby kevin » Tue Aug 26, 2014 2:00 pm

Nancy_Hutchison,

Light occurs,
It is shown occuring in this clip, which unfortunately cuts off just as the light occurs within the confines of the Earths memory field,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-28927311
Kevin
kevin
The Hobbit
 
Posts: 2901
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby Mikado14 » Tue Aug 26, 2014 2:05 pm

Wags,

She appears to be guilty of what she accuses others.

If Nancy would have said that John's father was of the Order of the Knights Templar than it would have not warranted a response as what I gave and I would not have made it but would have understood exactly what she was talking about.

Her statement was as conclusive as mine. Or one could say it was stated as such to incite a response as mine knowing full well that the "Knights Templar" do not exist in the capacity in which the name implies.

Mikado
The thing about Inner Circles is that they are like Boxes - difficult to think outside of them.

"When the Debate is Lost, Slander is the Tool of the Loser" SOCRATES

“There are two ways to be fooled. One is to believe what isn't true; the other is to refuse to believe what is true.”
― Søren Kierkegaard
User avatar
Mikado14
Commander
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 10:38 am
Location: Located where I want to be...or not...depends on the day.

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby wags » Tue Aug 26, 2014 2:21 pm

Mikado,

Interesting though...
Boswell : ‘I have provided you with an argument, but I am not obliged to supply an understanding"
User avatar
wags
Commander
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:46 am
Location: South Saxons Kingdom, Angleland

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby kevin » Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:12 pm

Nancy ,
What tuning are You and John using?
http://thestreetphilosopher.tumblr.com/ ... -for-music
Kevin
kevin
The Hobbit
 
Posts: 2901
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby Nancy_Hutchison » Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:40 pm

Mikado14 wrote:Wags,

She appears to be guilty of what she accuses others.

If Nancy would have said that John's father was of the Order of the Knights Templar than it would have not warranted a response as what I gave and I would not have made it but would have understood exactly what she was talking about.

Her statement was as conclusive as mine. Or one could say it was stated as such to incite a response as mine knowing full well that the "Knights Templar" do not exist in the capacity in which the name implies.

Mikado


Mikado,
John speaks in sentences, which if I am lucky, are three or four words in length.
(If you hear him on TV or radio, it is not spontaneous conversation, he has a "script of responses" that he uses).
I gave the information that he spoke to me.
Also, I did quite a bit of research into "Knights Templar". I disagree with your statement, "Knights Templar do not exist in the capacity in which the name implies."
Again, you are making an assumption and conclusion that "Knights Templar" do not exist.
And...how would you know "the capacity" in which the words John used implied?

In no way, whatsoever, did I make my statement to "incite a response from you."
And it is for this reason, that assumptions are made instead of inquiries and a true desire for exchange of information
....that I had originally wanted this to be a private discussion between Kevin and myself.

You are derailing this thread.
Would you please try to understand what I am trying to accomplish here?
If you do not agree with a statement made, such as "John's father was Knights Templar", then please ASK what I mean by that, instead of attacking the words that I wrote.

Nancy
Nancy_Hutchison
Lt. Commander
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:19 pm

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby Nancy_Hutchison » Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:43 pm

kevin wrote:Nancy_Hutchison,

Light occurs,
It is shown occuring in this clip, which unfortunately cuts off just as the light occurs within the confines of the Earths memory field,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-28927311
Kevin


I don't get a video, only a still shot.
Is the video posted elsewhere?
Nancy_Hutchison
Lt. Commander
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:19 pm

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby Nancy_Hutchison » Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:46 pm

kevin wrote:Nancy ,
What tuning are You and John using?
http://thestreetphilosopher.tumblr.com/ ... -for-music
Kevin


the final audio is "flanged" to 432
that audio is what is sent into the RF signal generators
Nancy_Hutchison
Lt. Commander
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 7:19 pm

Re: Observations--discussing the Elephant in the Room

Postby kevin » Tue Aug 26, 2014 3:50 pm

Nancy_Hutchison wrote:
kevin wrote:Nancy_Hutchison,

Light occurs,
It is shown occuring in this clip, which unfortunately cuts off just as the light occurs within the confines of the Earths memory field,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-28927311
Kevin


I don't get a video, only a still shot.
Is the video posted elsewhere?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYRAd2YV9mo
kevin
kevin
The Hobbit
 
Posts: 2901
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 1:24 pm

PreviousNext

Return to The Round Table



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests

cron