Adam Bull’s “Technology For a New Future”

[LuisP]

"He (Tesla) described relativity as a 'beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king.' In support of his statement he cited a number of experiments he had conducted as far back as 1896 on the cosmic ray. He has measured cosmic-ray velocities from Antarus, he said, which he found to be fifty times greater than the speed of light, thus demolishing, he contended, one of the basic pillars of relativity, according to which there can be no speed greater than that of light.”
-- in New York Times, 7/11/35.


Stumbled upon this Adam Bull guy. Very curious thinker. With a very curious book. Which I might read one of these days. Maybe you haven’t heard about him.

To my ignorant me, he makes a lot of sense, even if I am not equipped to say if he’s right or wrong. Only that what he says seems to me that others – in other domains or with a different language – are also saying. Or have said it, some long ago, some not so long ago. You just need to want to listen.

This is him speaking, out of his book but with it underlying, and you too might find it interesting:

The difference between steam engine like locomotion into a problem and the gentle breeze of an oscillating current transformer into a geo dynamic oscillator is the difference between a piston apparatus making lots of dampened deflection noise with a 2lb piston oscillating at delta x of delta t,
and
a perfect odd resonance harmonic coupling oscillator deflecting through the entire mass of a giant weight building or bridge, just from a mere 2lb swinging mechanical weight that can bring down buildings with an infinitely specified power by harmonic superpositioned deflections in the billions of pounds, through nothing but the storage of mechanical energy in dampening sound waves alone, specifically in the dimensions of time.

Many children ask their teachers why the ocean moves so unceasing, or why the sun and moon and stars do so. But when the child asks why the engine stops they are told that there is diminishing returns in the invention (power cannot be perpetually rotating). Whilst gravity is still not explained as a theory or even as a mathematical model adequately for it to be philosophically true conceptually, the planets and their calendars turn perpetually forevermore.

Gravity is not a cause and effect. Gravity is caused by something else. The effect is gravity. Something causes it.

Scientists, explain to me how electrons perpetually rotate around their proton's and or centers of gravity, perpetually. Explain to me why the atoms have electrons that spin around in orbit indefinitely with MASS, and MOTION indefinitely.

Electrical generators need to turn in order to generate magnetic current or electric current power, and to do that they need a fuel to cause them to turn around. The earth itself is a giant magnetic flywheel and itself is a generator of electric current from it's motion. What fuels this motor.

Light is not light. Light is dark. Light only happens when there is something the science men call mass, or rather, atoms, for the light to reflect off.
The problem is that the reflection isn't light reflecting off. It's cosmic rays pushing light out of the object. This can be proven by removing the object, and the ray will become dark again until it hits another planet like the moon, even the reflection from the moon itself is not light. Light cannot be seen in a vacuum. The light can only be seen when it leaves the vacuum.

So light does not travel in space, something else called electricity travels from each star (sun) to each planet. And when the pole of the planet work against the poles of the individual north and south pole individual magnets from the sun, then you get the light.

The science men will lie to you. They will say things like "less light reflections". The thing is, it is not light that creates the reflection. It is the cosmic ray. The cosmic ray is entirely invisible and it can pass through almost anything. Even things that electrons cannot. Enterprising scientists know how important this could be when it comes to the sub divisible particles of matter. The rays from the stars motion running against the motion of the planet iron core transformer that generates life and light, heat is to be thanked.

There is no heat in space. So there is no light in space.

The cosmic rays, create light, but they are not much of a light when passing through a vacuum or a vacuum tube i.e. the north and south pole streams (or lines of force) of magnetism create light when run against another north and south pole.
The magnetic poles of each planet and star can travel through the vacuum of space as cosmic rays, just like the magnetic particles of individual north and south pole magnet can go through a vacuum tube. These particles of north and south pole in a turbine can still be used to create light upon leaving the dark and empty vacuum of space.

Even if the cosmic ray, traveling faster than the speed of light through the "resistanceless vacuum", as soon as it comes accross the particles in the atmosphere which also have the positive protons north pole and the negative electrons south pole, then there will be resistance again, and so there will be light. Or rather what I established the scientists wrongly call reflections.

If the reflected photons were made to be represented by the suns and stars cosmic rays hitting the existing particles in every atom and pushing out the north and south pole orbits to create the light, then it would be alright.
But the scientists believe that light is a reflection, when actually when the cosmic ray gets out of a vacuum there can only then be light, and when it gets out of the vacuum and hits some mass to so-called "reflect", a different particle of light is emitted.

If the scientists made it so that the cosmic ray had no light, and was electricity, and when that electricity hit any atom with mass and squeezed out a new photon light particle it would be OK, but currently light is represented wrongly as a reflection when it is clearly an interaction with the media that produces the light. Or the space itself would be full of light, as the vacuum tube would be. Something we know is not the case. Light is only generated outside of the vacuum bulb, and not within it.

Light is generated by resistance, in a wire, in the same way that the light is generated in the air from the cosmic rays of stars and suns, and even the moon.
Light is NOT, repeat not produced by SUNS. Light is produced by the faster than light cosmic rays emitted by them reacting with the north and south pole individual magnets of other atoms. Which arises in the Quantum Electro Dyanamic theory of reflection percent chance.

The author estimates that there is enough energy from the stars alone touching this planet every year to run the planet for several million and look after all life on it. This is what created the species in their great number, and many magnetic metals on this earth. The earth has not stopped spinning, and neither has each planet. Each planet is a field magnet, so an orbiting field coil with a magnet inside it passing each pole could create electricity from the perpetual motion of the earth.

In a society where men fight; the chance of gravity becoming weaponised is a serious concern, the concern being that it might be the last weapon of all weapons. And so in every "golden age" there is the plight to risk total annihilation or risk living absolute mediocrity and extinction by self instead of by technology.

There comes a time, where the human condition of the men that know the secret on this planet being watched by the eyes of these men can no longer stay silent. The risk to the destruction of humanity by our own mediocrity might be as or more dangerous than the risk of this new fanciful technology.

There comes a time where things must be un-suppressed and Tesla's faster than light technology and gravitic energy transfer technology must benefit man. Less it's removal might breed far more terrible things than the greatest liberation of man. Such as his imprisonment.

We must resist our schooling or we might have no education.

[LuisP]

Furhter very curious thoughts from Adam :

Q.E.D tells us that the photon particles have a fixed chance of reflecting, because they travel at all points simultaneously to create the straight line of light we observe.

However, the problem with this is, if the ray was straight to begin, then the chance reflecting is irrelevant, and the rather important thing then is the motion of the individual atoms and their positive protons at the centre to their negative electrons at their outer , that are reflecting the photons, but as Q.E.D establishes photons cannot be reflected, they can only be "ejected" from atoms, or pass right through.

The problem with quantum reflection is, if the photon is not reflected but some part of the atom interaction itself was to do with it, then the chance of reflection is purely associated with the motion of the atomic mass, rather than the motion of the ray alone.

Therefore the thing that is coming from the sun, and the light it is producing must be treated as two distinctly seperate things.

I am beginning to wonder now whether the photons of light are really at all points simultaneously, and whether the reflection of chance has more to do with the synchronous rotation of the motion of metals conductors magnets and electrons, or north and south pole proton and electron charges. This would mean though that the light produced from the cosmic rays occurred merely because of the rotation of the atom rotation colliding against the straight path at the right timing to determine the reflection.

This would mean that "pure dark" zones of absolutely no reflection might be obtainable. Provided that everything about quantum physics and our science theory today is wrong. There is no "2 ways" of looking at this.

Fundamentally, if light, or photon particles, is not produced by stars but light is really produced the cosmic rays they make and radiate reacting with the mass of planets, and creating gravity and light, then everything we think we knew is wrong.

All of it. Rutherford, J.J Thompson, Einstein, Heaviside. All of it. Interestingly though Wheatstone, the inventor of the wheatstone bridge (the multi-meter) the speed of an electrostatic discharge is pi / 2 times faster than light.

Approximately 105,000 miles per second faster than the so-called speed of light. The so -called LIMIT of Einstein’s.

There is no limit here, only limited minds, and limited and small world of incomplete science. The electrostatic discharge is faster than light, so therefore, conservation is useless to us.

No longer is power and energy equivalent. No longer can scientists quack in defense.

There does seem to be an elitism, at the highest, and the lowest ranks of all men. It will not save you if you cannot tell how it works, and why it works, and how the science men are wrong.

Then you must convince everyone else.

This is how a new age is really born.

[LuisP]

What follows is from Hughe, a poster from elsewhere, whom I thank, and was written relating to Bull's claims :

Do scientists explain when Earth and sun's rotation will stop? How much friction exists between the two celestial objects? What energy source and mechanism makes Earth rotate around sun for billions years?
Here is absurdity of mainstream science. They can't explain even Earth and Sun's movement yet they boldly claim they figured out how entire universe works decades ago.

Do you think the Sun generates energy from nuclear fusion at unimaginable high temperature in the core? Thermodynamic laws fail literally on the Sun. How come the surface temperature of the sun is few thousands degrees K whereas the Corona shows millions degrees K?
Heat must flow high to low, which is under thermodynamic laws. I'm confused how do I interpret these laws, I actually gave them up. The sun and all stars are unreal or the laws are completely wrong?

The second law of thermodynamics fails in life forms again. How could it possible the order of complex increases as time flows? The law says entropy flows only one way. Chaos becomes order due to loss of energetic movement of matter. Entropy increases or decrease? My logic is if the law is correct, life forms must transform to simpler organisms. Human body is a small universe. So it's impossible for humans to exist.

The Big Bang theory says the universe will expands, eventually cool down to zero Kelvin degrees. All heat sources would exhausted. There will be nothing left to create energy. It's irreversible process. Suppose matter reaches at zero Kelvin degrees, atoms and electrons would solidified?
It should.
The problem is even at zero Kevin degrees, Quantum scientists claims it has energy of motion - Zero-Point Energy. Nowadays more scientists agree with vacuum has infinite potential of energy.

Electromagnetic force is 10^38 to 10^40 times stronger than gravity. Physicists believe in gravity bends lights - electromagnetic waves - because Einstein said. Light bending was detected near the Sun by astronomers at solar eclipse many years ago. Surface of gravity of the sun is 27.94 g. (Earth is 9.54 g). Lights barely has mass on it. In addition it's bonded by electromagnetic forces many times than gravity. Can it really pull light due to distorted space by gravity? or it's a refraction due to plasma near the sun?

[LuisP]

Lastly - but not in the least - check this still from Adam :

"Every day the moon uses some sort of wireless wave form (a bit like wi fi ) to move the trillions of watts of energy in the ocean from side to side. Instead of powering a machine from the ocean that is effected by the invisible wireless wave, Tesla, Leedskalnin and the pyramid builders found a way to intercept that invisible wireless cosmic ray that comes from the moon to make the ocean move.

Enough free energy to power the entire world twice over for a day is beamed down onto the ocean every minute.

What I have written about and suggested in my book is that instead of creating an ocean hydroelectric plant, we could go directly and intercept the wireless wave altogether - bypassing the need to abstract the energy from the secondary ocean movement from the wireless gravity wave of the moon, and instead absorb the primary cosmic ray energy that comes from every planet and star in the form of gravity.

Indeed- this wireless gravity wave, provides the ocean with all of it's current and movement. Without the wireless invisible gravity wave between the earth and the moon, the ocean would not move to turn around the niagra falls generator plant.

Tesla's greatest achievement was not the niagra falls generating plant, or even the realisation of the hydroelectric concept.

Tesla's greatest achievement was bypassing the ocean current altogether, and going directly to the moon and other cosmic objects."