Emails from the Token

[Soloma]

That was my thought process of wags. I have only seen him as a distraction, does anyone recall when and why wags appeared? It is why I stopped supporting Fruitbat and his test, he clearly does not think before he posts.

Total distraction, both put in place to support the attack on Linda and anyone that inquires about TT Brown and anyone who might utilize similar knowledge, like JK Hutchison. She seems like she has been programmed by the system, one that her father was so much a part of.

I am all for taking out the trash.

[kevin]

That was my thought process of wags. I have only seen him as a distraction, does anyone recall when and why wags appeared? It is why I stopped supporting Fruitbat and his test, he clearly does not think before he posts.

Total distraction, both put in place to support the attack on Linda and anyone that inquires about TT Brown and anyone who might utilize similar knowledge, like JK Hutchison. She seems like she has been programmed by the system, one that her father was so much a part of.

I am all for taking out the trash.

Best not to personalize any thoughts, that only enables further distraction.
The never ending tennis match between linda/mikado shows clearly how that distraction becomes all enveloping.

The only sure way to overcome all of this is to stay foccused upon a straight track that leads to the comprehension of how universe operates, then reasons may become clear as to why such elaborate distractions are enabled.
What might be the consequences ?????
And who or what may already be utilizing TTB knowledge?
Would they want a bunch of ameatures to bumble into their assumed private garden/s?
Kevin

[Mikado14]

kevin,

Trying to let this run its course but I think fruitbat was only talking in reference to his perception in dealing with "inner demons" and how he reacted over on the Token. Perhaps you should do the same or just let him speak his peace as to how it affected him and what his thoughts were at the time.

I do not believe he was making an attack at you, he was merely stating as I said, his perceptions at the time. I think that is a personal thing and something you can do as well.

If I am wrong, sorry, but it is what I took from what he wrote.... and a few other things in another direction.

Mikado

[kevin]

kevin,

Trying to let this run its course but I think fruitbat was only talking in reference to his perception in dealing with "inner demons" and how he reacted over on the Token. Perhaps you should do the same or just let him speak his peace as to how it affected him and what his thoughts were at the time.

I do not believe he was making an attack at you, he was merely stating as I said, his perceptions at the time. I think that is a personal thing and something you can do as well.

If I am wrong, sorry, but it is what I took from what he wrote.... and a few other things in another direction.

Mikado

Thats how it is meant to appear.
But there in the middle of what seems as something else, is the DEFINATE attack.
It becomes accumulated, and taken as factual.
He could have blurted out all about HIS demons as much as He liked, but buried in the middle He had to state in a factual manner lots of references to Me.
I don't intend to try and defend those statements, and offer rebuttals( been listening to You) as that is the desired outcomes, then He can plead innocent and say that I am again "CHIPPING AWAY" at him.
It's ballocks.
My last post on this thread.

Kevin

[LuisP]

Unfinished fights ….(sigh !)

I have to step in here, say my peace, and hope for the Best … while preparing to face the Worst.
So be it. Into the fray.

I have no sides in this fight. Am but a spectator. Who likes, respects and wish both parties could come, or reach – at the very least - some sort of a “cold coexistence” status.

For this, and regrettably I see it happening and be confirmed once again, is where it takes us, latent, unfinished business - low intensity warfare, unhealed ulcers and … casualties. Always, casualties.

One down. Hobbit.
Decided, today, to leave this thread. Tomorrow, who knows ?

Does that solve anything ?
No, it doesn’t. Worse, it gives ground for “tomorrows”, and unknown decisions.

For the record, and from my bench view :

A1 – Of the 894 words written by FB, 47 were isolated. Meaning, roughly 5 %.
A2 – The “remaining” 95 % are considered “something else”, as if, or kind of, a diversion that feints attention from a “DEFINATE attack”, which those 5 % truly demonstrate being the intent.

I do not subscribe to this point of view. It is simply too concealed an intention, to not be intentionally sought.

B1 – A post regarding any given subject is always the fruit of previous thought regarding what its author wishes to convey.
B2 – “Too much information becomes Noise”, and therefore why would FB want to expend 95 % of his energies passing a message to just compromise its understanding with 5 % of expenditure towards unrelated subjects ?

I do not subscribe to this point of view. It is simply too obvious an intention, not to have been purposefully sought.

C1 – When one wants to pass 95 %, one should stick to it being 100 %
C2 – When one wants to address 5 %, one should not disregard the remaining 95 %.

In other words,
Will you two please consider the possibility
(a) that you both are Wrong ?
(b) that you both Might be wrong ?

That’s all.

[LuisP]

And Soloma ?

You are a very level headed guy. Who I respect tremendously.
Would you reread your post ?
Very unleveled, from my “vantage point”. Maybe you’d like to clarify it.
Or not.

But you should. Reread your post, I mean.

[LuisP]

“… give wags a bit of sharp tongue
I felt (still do) very justified in what I was writing
but I feel sure he would have hated reading what I was going to write.
he may well have read my words as being cruel
I was able to see my actions though a different lens, that outside of my own self interest
I believe that I made the right decision when I stopped sending that email
The issue between us does of course remain, and will have to be solved at some point, but today, I managed to avoid "giving him some crap"
I am sure I will find a nice way or the correct time to get my point across….”


Excerpts taken, of course, at my own will and criteria.

121 words regarding Wags. Roughly, 13% of the overall post.

Meaning, not just one … but two concomitant Recipients of a post generally directed at Self.

Meaning, 13 % plus 5 % equals 18 % of a Post contents, directed towards specific persons.

Per chance ? as in, “shite happens” ? No, definitely not, from my side bench. Very purposefully, in fact, I’d say again - “… too obvious an intention, not to have been purposefully sought.”

One might even think - from this perspective – that the “main” Recipient of the “bandwagon baggage” was Wags and not Hobbit. A thought, which, truth be said from me, is correct.

Thing is,
Towards one, action was avoided because “he may well have read my words as being cruel”
Towards the other, why was that caution not shared ?

Up to you, FB, to know why.
But to me, from my bench, something you should think about.

This ends my stepping into the fray.


Wish you guys can muster the strength to defeat the Self, not the Other ... and do it in a "nice way".

[StarCat]

StarCat say: "Posting inflammatory thoughts may lead to self-immolation."

Nite-nite. I have a sick kitten to syringe feed and a mountain of laundry to fold.

The Indescribably Lovely StarCat

[LuisP]

"Posting inflammatory thoughts may lead to self-immolation."

Concur.

Thing is,
Immolate Thyself, not me.

And "that" makes all the difference, does it not ?


PS : Duality of matter. "Particle/Wave" behavior. Quantum Theory. Observer's "consciousness" interference.
PPS : Am I mad, or are you ?
PPPS : "Inflamatory" thoughts are healthy. They "Inflame", perhaps, the soul. And who knows what that may achieve ? A "new reality" ?

[StarCat]

I'm not mad. I'm indescribably lovely. It's true that fire can burn off impurities, but some thoughts trend more toward arson than tempering. I had more than a few of those last night at our World Famous local animal hospital. I refrained from punching the veterinarian. She needs lessons in bedside manner.

I do advocate as strongly for my human patients as I do for my cats, which I guess is a good thing. But I don't react well to condescending attitudes from doctors of any kind.

Cat