Georges Lakhovsky’s Multi-Wave Oscillator

[kevin]

LuisP,

Polarity and equator, plants so call grow at ninty degrees to the surface plane, why?
Leaves are pointing 360 degrees around the pole, why?

Kevin

Never have thought about that !
Very intriguing questions indeed ....

So,
what's your take, Hobbit ?

Don't be blinded by the light.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GCr1eTbxbw

You have been indoctrinated to BELIEVE it is the light, and it is beaming in like some giant torch from the sun, and plants are using this to grow.....You have been told.


Kevin

[kevin]

LuisP.
I will try again to describe that which is detectable.
Trees are best to test and describe relative to humans scale.
But the self same will apply at all scale.
I am too big even as a hobbit sized human for blades of grass.
A tree can manipulate it's twin circulating field flows directions, and at this precise moment many trees here are reversing their field flows above and below ground.
The evergreens merely shrink their field diameters down to a minimum.


North and South relative to a vertical tree.
The normal state that creates what is called gravity is counter clockwise North, clockwise South.
You are thus operating as such and are attracted towards the heart centre of the dominant field (earth)

The trees in summer reverse this so that water is attracted towards the outer edge of their field instead of towards the heart centre in the northern hemisphere relative to the tree.

If anyone creates a local field disturbance ( why I hate the stinking tetra towers)
this can cause a local disturbance to how a tree is trying to operate.

This is why I was so cautious about Nancy and Johns device.
Not about nancy and John.

If Your device is thus causing a disturbance near the surface it may cause the grass in that location to not be able to reverse so called gravity relative to its own field.
There is no gravity, it is a consequence , not a force.

Think about all of the crazy devices been installed everywhere?????????
The creation of cancers is most likely down to all of this disturbance?
Cancer is a living entity, we need to locally deprive it of the very unique patterns ability to transmute ever more, thats what this thread is about, as was royal rife.
Whatever its signature is, we need to locally reverse it so that it cannot transmute, but instead vanishs.

[LuisP]

Well, I do appreciate MM even if its music hasn’t the answers …. far as I am able to hear !

Whoever has been around trees or plants and Looked at them, knows that they sense another’s proximity – without either one having ever grazed a single leave of the other – and will grow accordingly, the one growing giving the already existing one a wide berth even at the expense of quitting the 90 degrees to the surface plane. This is not true of all plants and trees, of course, but the majority do behave in this way.

Whomever that may be, also knows that they will extend powerful, heavy branches towards the dominant wind quadrant and will grow smaller, lighter ones along its “dominant direction”. Also knows they will go to the extent of stopping their growth and wait till its “wind facing” branches are stout enough before pulling themselves upwards once again.

Finally, they too will know that a tree or plant will need many years before quitting its “underdog” condition, and assert themselves as Right by their own right, regardless of whatever lies in their vicinity, all the while adapting to “unseen” or “untouched” neighboring realities (using these terms as we, Man, understand them) .

How do trees and plants know all this ?

Ed Wagner, as I posted on another thread (viewtopic.php?f=50&t=1158&start=30#p33649) has discovered that they exchange a “language” and do indeed “talk” among themselves- “If you chop into a tree, you can see that adjacent trees put out an electrical pulse. This indicates they communicate directly" , he dixit.

So, Hobbit, how does all this mixes with “spin” and simple Laws of Physics, be these the MSM ones or those you so beautifully see operating in their stead ?

It has to be a lot more than that … seems to me.
Don’t you think ?

Yes, I tend to agree - the “device” I installed is creating a “disturbance”. Mikado has spoken about “ transmission nodes” being emitted by it, whatever that means (too ignorant to understand that too !) but I have installed a similar device in my parent’s garden around a pine tree together with the Hutchison’s anti-radiation unit, and so far – too soon to call it, though - no such consequence has manifested itself ! Lots of grass there, also, and it is thriving !

And yes, I can understand – and share – your own “duality” over being “cautious about Nancy and Johns device. Not about nancy and John.” You know and understand stuff I can’t even begin to grasp.

But – I ask – are they breaking the Law ? or are they “forcing” whatever it is “outlawed” to regain its law abiding conformity ? Is radiation created by our design a “lawful” presence in our environment ? Is it not You that says (if I got it correctly !) that it is not due to chance that certain substances have “massed” themselves in a certain “memory” that if disturbed, could cause catastrophe ? So, if someone is “able” to force that memory to prevail over the interference, how come can that be “uncautious” ?

I know I’m speaking about things I haven’t the slightest authority, therefore, making a fool of myself or - in a more compassionate way of judging me - just stating my complete ignorance over these questions, but I beg to be listened to from exactly that point of view. Because, some things make sense to us ignorant mortals and others, simply don’t ! Some things “talk” to us in “languages” not yet understood, but real nevertheless ! And all of that is absolutely indifferent to “certified authorities”. It just happens.

I have seen a “dowser” in action ! a teenage kid, with rubber soled shoes, walking around with a olive tree stick twisted in his hands ! who “found” water more than 250 feet below surface … WTF “language” was he “listening” to ? why am I deaf to it ? why is the overwhelming majority ? regardless, he “heard” it. Does that mean that we, the vast majority, were Right, and therefore, he wrong ? No, exactly the opposite. He is the one who was right, even if he was the only one that “heard” or “felt” that language. It just happened.

Can please some PhD in Physics “teach” me how to dowse ? Are there Books and Lab Studies about it available in some University, were “White Papers” written with a methodology that I can “reproduce” all by myself so as to reach identical results ?

Where does all this take us ?
Shall we just deny – more ! – shall we “punish”, what we don’t understand, but others clearly do despite our abject impotence to replicate their understanding?

Just to name a simple few, is Lakhovsky a loner ? is Hutchison a “ground breaker” ? is Ed Wagner a “pioneer” of uncharted terrains ? or are they all just listening to different languages that read the same text and many before them have also heard, and many more are hearing still ?

The “text” exists ! how can anyone doubt this given the colossal evidence ? but it was – it surely seems ! - written in many, many languages.

As it should be… or so say some very old tales that are regarded by many as manipulating fiction, and I’m not just talking about the Aramaic, Hebrew or Latin ones. Those are just tales spoken in 3 languages. We should remind ourselves that more than 7.000 languages exist around this speck of cosmic dirt and that the overwhelming majority of them talk in one way or another about a same “text”.

Coincidence ?
Right. Sure.

Either we tackle it with all we’ve got, or we are condemned to be like the dog that chases its own tail without ever biting it, much that he wags it (pun intended !), because going around in circles is but what can we accomplish.

“Dura Lex, Sed Lex” !


That is why I say blessed are those who find water where we only see emptiness.

[kevin]

LuisP,
You speak the language of trees, it flows through words I can hardly comprehend , like crystal clear water.

The trees KNOW where another trees is....because of several reasons.
1, The matrix they build upon.
2,The field they build with.

All fields symbiotically interact, but the dominant field is king ( this will be the key to cancer)

First and most seriously is the matrix, without comprehending that it exists , then all the words in christendom are but confetti.
Space is omni present, it is universe, it is universal.
You , Me and He /She are space beings, so is the tree.
The planet is a space being, as is the moon, as is Mars etc etc.
They are all composed in space, no-thing is seperate.

An Oak produces ten thousand acorns, but one falls precisely on the matrix location best suited to enable the acorn to transmute into a mighty Oak.
Location, location, location.
As where Obama visited this week, they seek , but still are blind to WHY.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-29126854

They are not seeing the matrix location there, their senses are too dumb to see, their pictures reveal patterns, but they cannot see the wood for the trees.

The geometry of universe enables transmutation upon it, thus all of creation operates to the base matrix, in a fabulous variety of consequences.
The flow of universe carries information, the acorn is the radio reciever capable of attuning to the required information to build( transmute) into becoming a mighty Oak.
The field of that Oak will dominate locally, it will allow and enable a grove around itself relative to the patterning of it's dominant field.
Trees do talk, but You need to tune into radio 1.618, also on radio .618.....radio Phi... a golden channel in ratio to the tune of fibonacci.




Kevin

[Mikado14]

Transmission nodes come to mind that are being emitted from the ring. These nodes will affect the ability of the grass to grow. I have seen this with EM transmission.

Mikado

Care to clarify that a bit, Mikado ? as in, dumb it down to plain English ?

I'll try.

A transmission node is essentially a part of the RF transmission pattern that is radiated from an antenna.

If you go to the search link below, you should see different patterns created by different antennas. I believe you will see from those images what I am talking about.

https://www.google.com/search?q=rf+ante ... 9#imgdii=_

Certain frequencies can impair the growth of vegetation, well, some vegetation. A long while back, I remember seeing something similar around an RF tower. I do have a question....are there any pipes or anything metal in close proximity to the tree which would be underground? Perhaps a drain pipe/sprinkler? Is it possible that there is a transmitter/antenna in close proximity? Perhaps, whatever the copper tube is doing is creating a resonant frequency that is not conducive to the grass?

I am merely throwing some crap on the wall to see what will stick but the pattern I see in the photos, remind me of the transmission patterns from an RF Antenna or the nodal pattern.

Hope that helped,

Mikado

[DavidG]

Maybe what you are seeing is that the equator of the tree's field is being replaced by the ring, so the the tree's equator is being relocated to a different plane?

Resulting in different behaviour of surrounding plantlife?

2 cents...

[kevin]

Just been wandering about our garden checking the trees fields and same directions.
We have a wide variety of different trees and they are reacting differently.

The evergreens are lowering the detectable reverse directions of fields above and below ground, but remain green and vibrant, the other trees are loosing their leaves at different rates.
Some are practically neutral in field flows, others are reverting to normal.
They must be doing this by altering the resonant cavities structure shape??????
Whereas the denser evergreens vary this only fractionally as they hold far less water???

Kevin

[LuisP]

Mikado

Tx. So you’re talking about a “radiated” effect, as in, “something” getting “out” of the copper ring.

I’d say that is a bit “hard to stick” since it is a simple copper ring around a tree trunk supported by PVC tubes, with no “input” linked to it, so only able (?) to “collect” ? How do you see it being able to “radiate” ? Or are you thinking about the tree itself being the “radiator” ? Then again, were that to occur, if what is “collected” is used by the tree to its benefit and if its evident improvement may be thus explained, would not then what the tree “radiates” from what it has“ collected” be also beneficial ? I mean, can a tree receive a “good frequency” and “resonate” a “bad” one from it ?

Why do you dismiss as a lower possibility the water privation to the grass, sucked by the tree in a “famished” induced state by whatever it is that is being “received” ?

Sprinkler system (pipes, connections, etc) is all in PVC, and is underground. Only metal present are in the sprinklers themselves, some tiny wire coils associated with the head. No transmitter/antenna in proximity. Only thing I have there is a TV satellite dish, and far away, at that.

I’ll try to water that grass zone a lot more and see if it improves or not to exclude this reason, the other more drastic measure being the removal of the “device” itself, something I really don’t want to do. And I’ll keep an eye on my parent’s grass around the pine tree …

Differently,
This question about “fields” acting upon a fixed “matrix” that Hobbit considers and DavidG seconds (tx to both, too) when talking about the tree’s “equator” having changed.

I’d say “something” has to explain the fact that trees and plants “sense” another’s presence without having ever touched them, not to mention, “see” them. So, is it “fields” interacting ? maybe, it sure makes, well, sense, given the fact that they unquestionably, undoubtedly, do sense each other.

And if Lakhovsky’s right and the tree is “receiving” additional “food” (and “health food”, at that !) by reason of my having placed a “food collector” ring around it, then it is in consequence that its “field” may have, so to speak, enlarged by reason on having been thus invigorated ?

If that is the case, then I’m completely out of my depth as how to address this.

Maybe plant something “inside the perimeter” and see if it grows or fades ? But plants presently around the tree do not exhibit damage ! so, a plant’s field can sustain the tree’s “enlargement” but that of the grass can’t ? Hobbit again comes to mind …. to make something thrive, something else will suffer. One’s memory can only be enhanced at the expense of another’s loss. But this would contradict mathematics in this stance …. for if, once again, Lakhovsky is right, what the tree is receiving is not “taken” from the grass but from “the universe”, meaning, we are not in the presence of a Subtraction but of an Addition ! something was added to the tree while the grass kept constant.

So, inside this “fields context” and keeping Mathematics in mind, how come the grass is suffering ?



PS – Yes Hobbit, I concur. The leaves are falling a lot sooner this year. Why ?

[kevin]

LouisP,
"WHY"

A variation occuring.
I haven't the graphs in place, but recognise what TT Brown had in place to plot such.
I just sense such.
When I near certain people, or communicate with them often I recognise them.

This is an information based universe, with geometry underpinning the framework for information to flow upon.
All physical entities exist within their own unique information fields, the Oak tree has a dominant field signature that can communicate best with the flowing information within ever larger memory fields to sustain itself here in the here and now moment.
Those flows can be locally diverted, sort of distorted leading to entities struggling to maintain in the here and now moment.
Other entities may be able to better communicate in the here and now moment.

I do not have a mobile phone....there is a very large and complicated game afoot.
K.I.S.S.
Learn the basics...to better comprehend the game.

You can't play chess without knowing what the board geometry enables the different pieces to displace about upon it.

I wander about checking the board , then checking how the pieces are moving and affecting each other.

The pieces move because of information enabling them to move.
Kevin

[Nancy_Hutchison]

Luis,
Is the Johnny Tube installed at or near this location?
Nancy